Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > GoJet
Are the CRJ-550s Really Coming? >

Are the CRJ-550s Really Coming?

Search

Notices
GoJet Regional Airline

Are the CRJ-550s Really Coming?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2019, 10:46 PM
  #301  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by dino87
Where is your evidence that they can't hold a schedule?
Obviously you missed the IOCC meltdowns.....it was so bad Delta sent their pilots a memo advising them to avoid commuting on Gojet....
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 10-03-2019, 12:54 PM
  #302  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 896
Default

Originally Posted by FollowMe
United lost millions because Oscar responded poorly. When someone is dragged bloody off of one of your flight the ONLY response is “This should never happen to anyone, I will personally ensure that everything within the power of UAL will be directed to prevent any of our passengers from being treated like this in the future.”

As for GoJet all we have is anecdotal claims that “someone knew someone who knew someone who sneezed and was fired”. I’ve only seen one case and it had to do with USSERA, not anything even remotely medical. If what you say is true a gaggle of lawyers would be tripping each other to be the first in line for the lawsuit that would come. Of course if you have some evidence and care to share, or find that reporter and have it published I’d be happy to read about it.
What should have happened was the lawsuit being thrown out. It should never have been a story other than a passenger defied a lawful order from a LEO. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Green Needles is offline  
Old 10-03-2019, 05:17 PM
  #303  
On Guard!
 
Meow1215's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Default

Originally Posted by dino87
Where is your evidence that they can't hold a schedule?
Go look at the DCI delayed cancelled/ report, G7 is the lions share of it.
Meow1215 is offline  
Old 10-08-2019, 02:16 PM
  #304  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 68
Default

Originally Posted by Green Needles
What should have happened was the lawsuit being thrown out. It should never have been a story other than a passenger defied a lawful order from a LEO. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
You are probably correct, but what makes you think it was lawful? United sold the doctor the seat. United boarded the doctor onto the airplane. Then United decided it wanted to use his seat to deadhead a crew. (Going on memory here.)

This was not the case of overbooking, which is covered by certain regulations that have the effect of laws. I think that you are probably correct that he was in violation of a law to obey the flight crew but I also believe that United was in breach of the law and not just a breach of contract.

The remedy for the doctor was to file a bloody action, as they say in England and as we do in the US.

I believe that United only offered $200 for someone to take a flight the next day. United also was informed that the doctor was a doctor and had to be doing doctorly things the next morning. United should have taken into account the fact that the failure of the doctor to be there the next day could be putting patient's lives at risk.

United could have easily up the offered compensation to 3, 4 or 500 and found a volunteer. Not many people are going to take 200 because that is not worth it so you can spend the night in Chicago, get up at 4 am, take a van to the airport and get to your destination on 3 hours of sleep.

United did not care one bit about the patients the Doctor had to treat. It was all about showing this peon that it had the power to treat him like **** at any moment it chose because in United's viewpoint, he is ****.
LadyJustice is offline  
Old 10-08-2019, 04:04 PM
  #305  
Gets Weekends Off
 
majorpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Position: Line holder
Posts: 513
Default

Originally Posted by Green Needles
What should have happened was the lawsuit being thrown out. It should never have been a story other than a passenger defied a lawful order from a LEO. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.


The seat occupier was nonviolent. BTW, last time I checked, the law isn’t “peaceably noncomply, get your faced bashed in.” That’s not ‘murrican-while it may have been more prevalent in the past, CCTV, cell phones, and body cams continue to create needed consequences for stupidity. But a busted face for not moving along quickly enough can be expected in many less enlightened, more totalitarian regimes, tho, so maybe there’s hope for you...you keep doing you!
majorpilot is offline  
Old 10-08-2019, 05:36 PM
  #306  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by Green Needles
What should have happened was the lawsuit being thrown out. It should never have been a story other than a passenger defied a lawful order from a LEO. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Unfortunately the guy that took him off wasn't a LEO or CPD, but basically a Security Guard that exceeded his authority and opened UAL and the airport to immense liability which is why they all settled out of court.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 10-09-2019, 05:46 AM
  #307  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by LadyJustice
United sold the doctor the seat.
Airlines don't sell seats. They sell contracts to transport you and your belongings between two airports. Legally that's a big difference.
KyberCrystal is offline  
Old 10-09-2019, 03:56 PM
  #308  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 896
Default

It's actually pretty simple. The contract of carriage and federal law both allow the involuntary removal of a passenger. If you remain on the plane after being told to exit, you are trespassing. It doesn't matter how non violent you are, if you refuse to leave, you are the one in the wrong. If you refuse an order from a LEO or security guard, you're even further in the wrong.

From what I understand the Chicago aviation security officers have or had limited police powers. I'm not sure exactly what the extent of their police authority was at the time, but passengers need to comply. The news did what the news does best, and that's to tell a one sided piece of propaganda.

Not that this has any bearing on the justification of use of force (the officers didn't know this at the time), the passenger that everyone hailed as a doctor actually had his medical license suspended after being convicted of multiple felonies for trading sex for drugs. Again, that didn't affect the use of force that day since the officers had no knowledge of it at the time, but it further illustrates the PR nightmare due to our *******ty news system. They painted him as an innocent saint brutalized by the evil United airlines.

There are positive and negative ways of dealing with customer service challenges, but this incident didn't do us any favors for trying to have compliant pax.
Green Needles is offline  
Old 10-09-2019, 06:41 PM
  #309  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 67
Default

Keep in mind this is a company that spent 40 Million dollars a year in lost gas tax exemptions to avoid having a misspelled name of theirs featured not very promentantly on an NRA page. How much more does it cost to have Endeavor, Skywest, or Republic to operate a flight vs, GoJet and Compass probably not a lot in comparison. Besides the public doesn't understand what connections, express, or eagle mean they just see the mainline name, so it's their brand that takes damage cause the regional doesn't really have a brand.
Dstblj52 is offline  
Old 10-10-2019, 02:42 PM
  #310  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: ground
Posts: 21
Default

The idiot Oscar should have said that it wasn’t United Airlines that operated the flight, it was one of our regional partners, and we’ll take care of the situation immediately, and it’ll never happen again, instead of taking the blame. Why would the guy have to be taken off of the airplane anyway, if he already had a seat? Pilots need to DH? Too bad. Poor planning on your part. Also, where was the Captain when all of this was going on? Hiding in the cockpit? I would think he/she could have eased the situation some by explaining to the passengers what had to be done.
pilotnmech is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hawker445
SkyWest
11
07-08-2022 04:51 PM
fortyeight
Republic Airways
58
02-13-2019 09:01 AM
FourBarCFI
Career Questions
6
01-03-2019 08:04 AM
CRM1337
Regional
14
09-03-2015 11:19 AM
idlethrust
Regional
75
06-17-2014 05:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices