it's official FAPA is negotiating lower rates
06-12-2011, 02:52 PM
#142
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 641
Nooo ! They are the Golden Boys ! In summation:
The Rev says:"Gee,you guys are the goods,but well....$200 large and the board has shut off the money tap.Plus,WH says you make too much.And our bonuses are in danger ! So,we want you to be even BIGGER stakeholders ! Shiny jets for everyone ! Just give me what I ask,and everything is great ! Profit sharing (cough-cough,what profits ?),minority stake by 2014 (Find a buyer by then,or you're on your own-glub-glub).Plus,all your colleagues will be so happy that you started them down the ye olde slippery slope.Thanks,guys !
The Rev says:"Gee,you guys are the goods,but well....$200 large and the board has shut off the money tap.Plus,WH says you make too much.And our bonuses are in danger ! So,we want you to be even BIGGER stakeholders ! Shiny jets for everyone ! Just give me what I ask,and everything is great ! Profit sharing (cough-cough,what profits ?),minority stake by 2014 (Find a buyer by then,or you're on your own-glub-glub).Plus,all your colleagues will be so happy that you started them down the ye olde slippery slope.Thanks,guys !
06-12-2011, 03:17 PM
#143
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 25
I keeping thinking about the look on my sons face the first time he reeled in a fish all by himself. He was so stoked! But then when that fish slipped out of his hands and back into the water, oh boy was he devastated. His world had suddenly turned upside down.
The next few weeks is going to be really fun to watch on APC!
The next few weeks is going to be really fun to watch on APC!
06-12-2011, 03:21 PM
#144
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 227
What i am saying is that they would be happier deciding their own fate, not having you do it for them. If you got your snap-backs, they would be able to argue for theirs (if they have any coming, I don't know.)
06-12-2011, 06:33 PM
#145
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 879
YGBSM - when was the last time an unrepresented employee group at RAH got something just for asking?
06-12-2011, 07:30 PM
#147
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
Here's some from the Faultpush hit parade:
"FAPA was created for the Frontier pilots. That's the same reason that FAPA is not looking to represent the combined groups. You paint it like there's some conflict in that. "
Just like the RPC !
"One side's delay tactics are another's SLI process. We're following it. The fundamental problem is that one side has nothing to gain in that process, and the other has nothing to lose. "
Hmm,see below....
"The last time I checked, the SLI arbitration hasn't been decided yet. Until the arbitration is decided, you'll see both sides presenting their cases. To each side, the other's argument is ridiculous (e.g. I've heard that RAH asked for a 7 to 1 ratio). In the end, the arbitrator decides what is "fair and equitable", and we live with that. You won't find FAPA pulling a USAir over the outcome of the arbitration, and I hope that IBT wouldn't either. "
Have integrity issues,much ? Well,the IBT didn't,did they ?
"FAPA was created for the Frontier pilots. That's the same reason that FAPA is not looking to represent the combined groups. You paint it like there's some conflict in that. "
Just like the RPC !
"One side's delay tactics are another's SLI process. We're following it. The fundamental problem is that one side has nothing to gain in that process, and the other has nothing to lose. "
Hmm,see below....
"The last time I checked, the SLI arbitration hasn't been decided yet. Until the arbitration is decided, you'll see both sides presenting their cases. To each side, the other's argument is ridiculous (e.g. I've heard that RAH asked for a 7 to 1 ratio). In the end, the arbitrator decides what is "fair and equitable", and we live with that. You won't find FAPA pulling a USAir over the outcome of the arbitration, and I hope that IBT wouldn't either. "
Have integrity issues,much ? Well,the IBT didn't,did they ?
06-12-2011, 08:58 PM
#149
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 879
"The last time I checked, the SLI arbitration hasn't been decided yet. Until the arbitration is decided, you'll see both sides presenting their cases. To each side, the other's argument is ridiculous (e.g. I've heard that RAH asked for a 7 to 1 ratio). In the end, the arbitrator decides what is "fair and equitable", and we live with that. You won't find FAPA pulling a USAir over the outcome of the arbitration, and I hope that IBT wouldn't either. "
06-12-2011, 09:39 PM
#150
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
B. For the period of seven (7) years, beginning with the first bid period after
the date on which the seniority integration becomes effective, Republic Pilots,
Midwest Pilots and Lynx Pilots will have priority for all CA and FO jobs on CRJ
200, E- 135, E-140, E-145, E- 170 and E-175 aircraft; including aircraft acquired
to replace such aircraft removed from the fleet."the date on which the seniority integration becomes effective, Republic Pilots,
Midwest Pilots and Lynx Pilots will have priority for all CA and FO jobs on CRJ
200, E- 135, E-140, E-145, E- 170 and E-175 aircraft; including aircraft acquired
So,if F9 goes glub,you go to the end of the line.We have a fence,too.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
