Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
Frontier jets will fly out of Milwaukee >

Frontier jets will fly out of Milwaukee

Search

Notices

Frontier jets will fly out of Milwaukee

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2009, 08:51 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by 320ToBearz
Non of your examples were another airline actively flying their old routes under their old brand.

Frontier pilots will be no different than the Republic ones when that first bus flies out of MKE in direct violation of the Midwest CBA.
The airlines I listed as an example met their demise for different reasons, but the end result for the crews was the same. I still stand by my point that they found a way to move on.

You also still miss the point that Midwest was NOT on strike, therefore neither the F9 or RAH pilots are scabs. They (the F9/RAH pilots) are NOT obligated to follow the Midwest CBA. They have their own contracts which do not give them an option to refuse the flying out of MKE. Doing so would be an ILLEGAL work action on their part, and would put their jobs in jeopardy. Basically, what you're asking is for another pilot group(s) to put their job on the line in order to POSSIBLY save yours. Your own pilot group could have engaged in a wildcat strike as soon as the RAH/Midwest deal was announced, but it didn't, probably because your MEC knew that it would be ILLEGAL to do so. So who the h**l are you to expect another group to do it for you? Let go of the chip on your shoulder. You'll feel a whole lot better, and if you wind up integrated with RAH/F9 at some point, it will make for a much more pleasant work environment if you're not bitter towards the guy in the other seat. Not to mention it makes it lot easier to unify against management during contract negotiations when the crews aren't fighting among themselves.
KDENPilot is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 09:14 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 114
Default

Originally Posted by 320ToBearz
They will be scabbing it once that first airbus flies out of MKE, you bet.


320ToBearz,
Your comment is highly offensive and way off base.

The Frontier pilots have a great deal of respect for the Midwest pilots but comments like yours will poison that perspective in a hurry. FAPA pilots will only fly Frontier aircraft operated under the Frontier 121 Flag Operating Certificate and only in Frontier colors. If you have a problem with Marketing or the new Holding Company (RAH) or the new codeshare arrangement, I suggest you take up an arguement with them.

Bedford wants to keep Frontier seperate and he is threatening to sell 50.1% of Frontier to do so, if needed. In that scenerio, I would imagine that Frontier would want the Midwest pilots for their planned growth. In the scenerio of a SLI with the multiple pilot groups, I know the Frontier guys want the Midwest guys integrated into mainline. Those sentiments will quickly change if your attitude is representative of the group.

Sempre Fi
Great Santini is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 09:55 PM
  #23  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: A320 CAPT
Posts: 21
Default

Originally Posted by KDENPilot
Boy, you're bitter, give it a rest already. You weren't on strike, no picket lines were crossed, therefore no scabbing occurred. You want to point out a scab, there's all sorts of links to scab vision on the Amerijet strike thread. Oh, and guess what, even if either the Frontier or Republic guys wanted to refuse the flying on principle, they couldn't. It would be an illegal work action, and those ARE AGAINST THE LAW, or are you so blinded by irrational anger and hatred that you can't understand that? Midwest is owned by RAH now, as is Frontier, so using RAH and/or Frontier pilots to fly old Midwest routes is management's call, whether you like it or not. What's happened to the YX guys sucks, but it's not the fault of any pilot group...Midwest, Frontier, Republic or otherwise. Sometimes things just don't work out. Midwest pilots aren't the first group in aviation history to lose their jobs, and they probably won't be the last. Somehow, the pilots from Braniff 1 & 2, Frontier 1, Pan Am, Eastern (the guys who weren't scabs,) and many others managed to move on. The Midwest guys will, too.
Couldn't have said it better.
sempergumby is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 10:15 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by KDENPilot
Boy, you're bitter, give it a rest already. You weren't on strike, no picket lines were crossed, therefore no scabbing occurred. You want to point out a scab, there's all sorts of links to scab vision on the Amerijet strike thread. Oh, and guess what, even if either the Frontier or Republic guys wanted to refuse the flying on principle, they couldn't. It would be an illegal work action, and those ARE AGAINST THE LAW, or are you so blinded by irrational anger and hatred that you can't understand that? Midwest is owned by RAH now, as is Frontier, so using RAH and/or Frontier pilots to fly old Midwest routes is management's call, whether you like it or not. What's happened to the YX guys sucks, but it's not the fault of any pilot group...Midwest, Frontier, Republic or otherwise. Sometimes things just don't work out. Midwest pilots aren't the first group in aviation history to lose their jobs, and they probably won't be the last. Somehow, the pilots from Braniff 1 & 2, Frontier 1, Pan Am, Eastern (the guys who weren't scabs,) and many others managed to move on. The Midwest guys will, too.

you ever flown with any of the pilots you cited. The TWA guys sure haven't flying with some of them is a real PITA.
757upspilot is offline  
Old 09-24-2009, 11:29 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 52
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
you ever flown with any of the pilots you cited. The TWA guys sure haven't flying with some of them is a real PITA.
No to the Pan Am, TWA and Braniff 1, at least not that I know of. I know I've flown with a few Frontier 1 and Eastern types, and they all seemed like pretty good guys (non-scab Eastern, just to clarify, because we have a few of the "other" variety here, as well.) We have our share of PITA's to fly with here, just like anywhere else, but I haven't heard too many griping about how things went bad for them at their last carrier. Then again, I don't typically ask people about where they worked pre-FedEx, especially captains who are way senior to me, unless they bring it up first for some reason. I guess it is still pretty recent for some of the TWA people, but still, if they're now at UPS, then it can't be all bad for them.
KDENPilot is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 05:34 AM
  #26  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by 320ToBearz
They will be scabbing it once that first airbus flies out of MKE, you bet.
Time and time again I find it amazing how often the word "SCAB" is thrown around APC when the user obviously does NOT know the meaning!! In our industry, this "dirty word" has a very specific meaning. If your going to use it, you best know what your saying.

If you had a real "SCAB List", you'd be able to reference the cover page which tells you exactly what one is. This may aid you in 'appearing' to be a bit more educated when you see it fit to 'toss' the word about.

It's extremely evident that you have not a clue by the use of the word.

SCAB:
3 a(1) : a worker who refuses to join a labor union (2) : a union member who refuses to strike or returns to work before a strike has ended (3) : a worker who accepts employment or replaces a union worker during a strike

Under NO TERMs is the MidEx situation good. What Bedford's RAH has done is tragic. I think this should serve as a HUGE wake up call for the entire industry. Knowing some of the MidEx guys personally, they are a class group of pilots. They deserved none of this as they were pawns in Bedfords game....just as the F9 guys could be coined.

To have someone sit on the sidelines and toss out the label that F9'er are Scabs??? Your off your rock!! For your sake, I hope that you look at what your saying and understand that what your spouting is incorrect. Is it your oppinion that they are "acting" like what you call them?? Well, that's for you to decide, but are they SCABs?? Not even close by definition.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 06:51 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by SoCalGuy
Time and time again I find it amazing how often the word "SCAB" is thrown around APC when the user obviously does NOT know the meaning!! In our industry, this "dirty word" has a very specific meaning. If your going to use it, you best know what your saying.

If you had a real "SCAB List", you'd be able to reference the cover page which tells you exactly what one is. This may aid you in 'appearing' to be a bit more educated when you see it fit to 'toss' the word about.

It's extremely evident that you have not a clue by the use of the word.

SCAB:
3 a(1) : a worker who refuses to join a labor union (2) : a union member who refuses to strike or returns to work before a strike has ended (3) : a worker who accepts employment or replaces a union worker during a strike

Under NO TERMs is the MidEx situation good. What Bedford's RAH has done is tragic. I think this should serve as a HUGE wake up call for the entire industry. Knowing some of the MidEx guys personally, they are a class group of pilots. They deserved none of this as they were pawns in Bedfords game....just as the F9 guys could be coined.

To have someone sit on the sidelines and toss out the label that F9'er are Scabs??? Your off your rock!! For your sake, I hope that you look at what your saying and understand that what your spouting is incorrect. Is it your oppinion that they are "acting" like what you call them?? Well, that's for you to decide, but are they SCABs?? Not even close by definition.
I think what you are missing is that management has found a way to replace pilots with cheaper pilots. The process of a strike is not possible however the end result is the same. The pilots who will do the work know that other pilots who used to do the work are on the street. I can easily see how the republic pilots would be viewed as scabs.
757upspilot is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 06:52 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

Originally Posted by KDENPilot
No to the Pan Am, TWA and Braniff 1, at least not that I know of. I know I've flown with a few Frontier 1 and Eastern types, and they all seemed like pretty good guys (non-scab Eastern, just to clarify, because we have a few of the "other" variety here, as well.) We have our share of PITA's to fly with here, just like anywhere else, but I haven't heard too many griping about how things went bad for them at their last carrier. Then again, I don't typically ask people about where they worked pre-FedEx, especially captains who are way senior to me, unless they bring it up first for some reason. I guess it is still pretty recent for some of the TWA people, but still, if they're now at UPS, then it can't be all bad for them.
They all sit and complain that they used to be Captains and want to see the AA guys get F&%ked.
757upspilot is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 07:46 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
I think what you are missing is that management has found a way to replace pilots with cheaper pilots. The process of a strike is not possible however the end result is the same. The pilots who will do the work know that other pilots who used to do the work are on the street. I can easily see how the republic pilots would be viewed as scabs.


I agree.

Add to this that the Republic EXCO has not put out one communication supporting the union that is being replaced. Then add the fact that the replacement workers are being paid 50% the wages of the Midwest workers. Can't say that about TWA, Pan Am, Braniff, ...

This is a company lock-out that is being aided by Republics EXCO and pilots.

Don't hire Republic pilots
MD80 is offline  
Old 09-25-2009, 08:59 AM
  #30  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by 757upspilot
I think what you are missing is that management has found a way to replace pilots with cheaper pilots. The process of a strike is not possible however the end result is the same. The pilots who will do the work know that other pilots who used to do the work are on the street. I can easily see how the republic pilots would be viewed as scabs.
With respect, I think you are missing the point. Go back and read what I said "This should be a HUGE wake up for the entire industry".....I believe we both agree on that. We can see 'outsourcing', or cheaper labor is easily at the disposal for anyone's replacement by mgt as per Bedford's performance.

Unless you care to rewrite, or broaden the definition of a SCAB, use the term correctly. If you take the time to look at the Master SCAB List, observe....CAL, UAL, EAL, Comair, and soon to be AmeriJet. What do they ALL have in common, crossing the line of a Union Strike...thus a SCAB. So when F9'ers t/o out of MKE, is the Master SCAB List going to carry those pilot's name's??? Where's the "STRIKE" in which their SCAB'ing???

If someone out of frustration feel they need to lash out and use the 'ugliest term' in our industry incorrectly, have at it.....just shows 'your' inept understanding of what it truly means. If you need a Master SCAB List for yourself, PM and a copy is yours for your viewing.

****DISCLAIMER....I am NOT saying this whole situation is RIGHT, b/c it's NOT. It has shown how Mgt has found a way to further desecrate this profession by evidence of the RAH-MidEx-Frontier mess.

Last edited by SoCalGuy; 09-25-2009 at 01:22 PM.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
jetpilot4u
Major
74
08-13-2009 01:54 PM
thepilotswife
Major
63
08-06-2009 12:10 PM
CANAM
Frontier
206
06-26-2009 11:47 PM
Mason32
Hangar Talk
8
02-07-2009 07:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices