Search

Notices

ULCC Hits New Low

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2024, 04:01 PM
  #71  
Slave
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: Hot tub
Posts: 1,406
Default

Originally Posted by planejoe
Sir, this is a Wendy's.

The level of dysfunction is impressive with 152 airplanes, can't even imagine what it would be with 350.
the trailer park in Denver ran surprisingly smooth yesterday🤔🤔🤫🫣
ReserveCA is offline  
Old 10-06-2024, 04:01 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 601
Default

Originally Posted by Tranquility
Ummmmm, more than double the dysfunction???? 😬
From a purely mathematical standpoint, disfunction^2 equals function. Or something.
DumboDrop is offline  
Old 10-06-2024, 04:11 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by DumboDrop
From a purely mathematical standpoint, disfunction^2 equals function. Or something.
HOLY ****!!! We, 'with our powers combined' (thanks CA P.), could match Delduh?!
Tranquility is offline  
Old 10-06-2024, 04:35 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by ReserveCA
the trailer park in Denver ran surprisingly smooth yesterday🤔🤔🤫🫣

Hope it still does when it's blowing snow and grandma needs to walk across the ramp to the rear stairs.
planejoe is offline  
Old 10-06-2024, 04:52 PM
  #75  
Slave
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: Hot tub
Posts: 1,406
Default

Originally Posted by planejoe
Hope it still does when it's blowing snow and grandma needs to walk across the ramp to the rear stairs.
WHAT!
It snows in Denver?
ReserveCA is offline  
Old 10-07-2024, 03:37 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaseTractor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: Pipers!
Posts: 389
Default

Is the benefit faster turns times or just a result of limited gate space?

I wonder if salt on the ramp during cold weather will cause problems from a corrosion prevention standpoint years down the road with 150+ people embedding rock salt into the isle and carpets every boarding...
CaseTractor is offline  
Old 10-07-2024, 04:40 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Position: Joystick Operator
Posts: 903
Default

Originally Posted by planejoe
Sir, this is a Wendy's.

The level of dysfunction is impressive with 152 airplanes, can't even imagine what it would be with 350.
I will add, that most of the dysfunction comes with gate issues and space available.

I know there is more than just gates, but the amount of gates an F9 + NK merger would bring would be huge compared to what we have now.
spooldup is offline  
Old 10-07-2024, 12:21 PM
  #78  
Almost there
 
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,311
Default

Originally Posted by CaseTractor
Is the benefit faster turns times or just a result of limited gate space?

I wonder if salt on the ramp during cold weather will cause problems from a corrosion prevention standpoint years down the road with 150+ people embedding rock salt into the isle and carpets every boarding...
BB has touted the faster turn times as a result of dual boarding. That has yet to be true for my flights but I won’t argue the potential is there. I have heard we poached a SWA station manager to improve the process. Could be a false hope. We will also increase from 9 to 14 gates when it’s all completed. This doesn’t including the occasional international gate with a normal jet bridge. I surmise the operational costs for this facility are substantially cheaper over the long run than the previous gates but I don’t have anyway to back that hypothesis.

It might. We give away airplanes at the 8-12 year mark so it may not matter that much by that time. Can’t be too much worse than the myriad of bodily chemicals already festering in that carpet. Oh look! A peanut M&M! Mmmmm
Stayontarget is offline  
Old 10-07-2024, 03:49 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: Airbus (the wide ones)
Posts: 107
Default

Originally Posted by zoooropa
Frontier's "debt" is aircraft orders and a small credit facility that pays down pre delivery payments and then they make back the pdp when they do a sale lease back. Spirit's debt (and Jetblues and American's) is layer upon layer of bonds where they borrowed billions to pay for operations. Frontier hasn't borrowed anything. They could cancel future aircraft deliveries but every aircraft delivery is a net positive number on the balance sheet once the pdp loan is repayed and the slb is down, so it is a correct statement that frontier has zero bond debt.
So is this a correct hypothetical interpretation on how this affects Frontier?

Step 1: Placing the Aircraft Order

Frontier places an order with Airbus for a new airplane that costs around $50 million. Instead of paying the full amount upfront, they make a Pre-Delivery Payment (PDP), which is about 30% of the total cost, so Frontier pays $15 million.

Step 2: Financing the PDP

To cover this $15 million PDP, Frontier uses a small loan or credit facility. This loan is temporary and is meant to be repaid once the plane is delivered. This adds $15 million of temporary debt to Frontier’s balance sheet.

Step 3: Receiving the Airplane

When the plane is ready for delivery, Frontier needs to pay the remaining 70% of the plane’s price, which is $35 million. Instead of using their own cash, Frontier uses a Sale-Leaseback (SLB) arrangement.

Step 4: The Sale-Leaseback (SLB) Process

In the SLB process, Frontier sells the plane to a leasing company for the full $50 million and then immediately leases it back from them. This transaction allows Frontier to recover the $15 million PDP they initially paid, enabling them to repay the PDP loan. The leasing company covers the remaining $35 million.

Step 5: The Plane on the Ramp

After this transaction, the plane is now on Frontier’s ramp, and they pay a monthly lease fee to the leasing company rather than owning the plane outright.

Step 6: Debt Impact

The $50 million plane, through the SLB arrangement, doesn’t add long-term bond debt to Frontier. Instead, it becomes part of Frontier’s lease obligations, which is recorded as a financial liability. This is how Frontier reports the debt associated with new aircraft.

When Frontier repeats this process for multiple planes, say 82 aircraft, the total financial liability sums up to $4.09 billion (82 planes x $50 million each). This figure is shown as debt on their balance sheet, but it specifically relates to aircraft leases, not the kind of bond debt that other airlines might take on to finance operations.

So, while it appears as debt, it’s tied directly to leasing arrangements, not to traditional bonds.
doz4dllrs is offline  
Old 10-08-2024, 04:22 AM
  #80  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 74
Default

Originally Posted by doz4dllrs
So is this a correct hypothetical interpretation on how this affects Frontier?
Essentially yes. Although the SLB may or may not be for book value of the aicraft & so a net gain/loss will show in the financials. Also, the liability for the lease isn't on the purchase price. It's on the value of future lease payments over the term, which will vary depending on the interest rate.
ginntonic is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crxpilot
Allegiant
18
01-21-2019 09:10 AM
Knudiee
Part 91 and Low Time
5
07-08-2018 03:45 PM
FSUpilot
Regional
29
07-13-2007 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices