2024: the "Frontier will buy Spirit" theory
#61
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 35
So i'm looking at the stock data as a complete noob, but I'm curios what you all think...
When the merger was agreed upon for Frontier to buy Spirit the stock price was Frontier: $12.39 and Spriti was $21.73... I don't know what the market cap was at the time, or if that even matters.
I guess my thinking is as it stands, if Frontier can continue their stock price recovery (even a little bit) I see no reason they could not afford to buy Spirit. That's what I heard for the last 6 months, that Frontier was worthless and could not aquire Spirit anymore.
Frontier is trading now at $7.57 and Spirit is all the way down too $6.65...,
If anything, Indigo would be getting a steal if they could buy them for maybe 10-15 bucks a share.
How long would it take for Frontier to try to secure an aquisition if the apeal is struck down by the courts?
I do think there's a case to be made that combining to become a larger ULCC is good for the consumer. When you think about the opposing side, Jetblue is not really a LCC... They have premuim lie-flat seating on international flights to euorpe. It's not even comparable to someone like Frontier who is a full blown ULCC.
Okay, i'll step off my soap-box, but seriosly... I would be schocked if they did not put a bid in by the end of the summer/fall
When the merger was agreed upon for Frontier to buy Spirit the stock price was Frontier: $12.39 and Spriti was $21.73... I don't know what the market cap was at the time, or if that even matters.
I guess my thinking is as it stands, if Frontier can continue their stock price recovery (even a little bit) I see no reason they could not afford to buy Spirit. That's what I heard for the last 6 months, that Frontier was worthless and could not aquire Spirit anymore.
Frontier is trading now at $7.57 and Spirit is all the way down too $6.65...,
If anything, Indigo would be getting a steal if they could buy them for maybe 10-15 bucks a share.
How long would it take for Frontier to try to secure an aquisition if the apeal is struck down by the courts?
I do think there's a case to be made that combining to become a larger ULCC is good for the consumer. When you think about the opposing side, Jetblue is not really a LCC... They have premuim lie-flat seating on international flights to euorpe. It's not even comparable to someone like Frontier who is a full blown ULCC.
Okay, i'll step off my soap-box, but seriosly... I would be schocked if they did not put a bid in by the end of the summer/fall
#62
could always start the process 6 months before and by the time Sleepy Joe wants to block it, he’ll be gone. The biggest issue from the courts we’re Eliminating a ULCC. F9/NK, is not eliminating a ULCC.
#63
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 36
Or Donny loses again and they waste their time and money. I'm glad people like you aren't in charge.
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,311
F9+NK results in the elimination of a ULCC (Spirit). That is how the current administration will see it.
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 333
I thought the judge/administration was worried about the elimination of ULCC seats? JetBlue was to reconfigure Spirit planes with less seats. Frontier + Spirit wouldn’t decrease the amount of seating for poors.
#66
Almost there
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,283
The big reason was the raising of fares to make flying unaffordable for some. F9 and Allegiant wouldn’t be able to replace NK for 10ish years so the judge ruled the Clayton act was violated. The merger was too anticompetitive. There also is a clause about monopolies in the Clayton act so Herc could be correct.
#68
ehh, hard to say. yes NK is gone, but F9 is now twice the size. It's apples to Oranges compared to NK/B6. No idea if F9 would be interested but reading through the Judges ruling, It seems it would face less opposition is all.
#69
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,311
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-statements-district-court-decision-block-jetblues-acquisition-spirit
The court found that JetBlue’s proposed takeover of Spirit is unlawful because it “does violence to the core principle of antitrust law: to protect the United States’ markets – and its market participants – from anticompetitive harm.”
https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-laws-and-you
The Clayton Act
This law aims to promote fair competition and prevent unfair business practices that could harm consumers. It prohibits certain actions that might restrict competition, like tying agreements, predatory pricing, and mergers that could lessen competition.Harvard Law journal: https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-130/antitrust-law-is-not-that-complicated/
They define it as:
...anticompetitive conduct, which is conduct that tends to cause an increase in market power for reasons other than competition on the merits.
But Merging with a competitor, resulting in your ability to be the only guy in town, and potentially increase prices whenever you want, is anticompetitive.
Knowing what we know now, the courts will not permit a super ULCC to exist
#70
Almost there
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,283
From the DOJ press release:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-statements-district-court-decision-block-jetblues-acquisition-spirit
Anticompetitive. Hold that thought, lets look at the Clayton Act
https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-laws-and-you
What exactly is "anticompetitive"
Harvard Law journal: https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-130/antitrust-law-is-not-that-complicated/
They define it as:
In other words, offering a better quality widget, with better customer service, thus resulting in increased profits because you charge more, but the customer still comes because he thinks you are better, is not anticompetitive. That is "business 101."
But Merging with a competitor, resulting in your ability to be the only guy in town, and potentially increase prices whenever you want, is anticompetitive.
Knowing what we know now, the courts will not permit a super ULCC to exist
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-statements-district-court-decision-block-jetblues-acquisition-spirit
Anticompetitive. Hold that thought, lets look at the Clayton Act
https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-laws-and-you
What exactly is "anticompetitive"
Harvard Law journal: https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-130/antitrust-law-is-not-that-complicated/
They define it as:
In other words, offering a better quality widget, with better customer service, thus resulting in increased profits because you charge more, but the customer still comes because he thinks you are better, is not anticompetitive. That is "business 101."
But Merging with a competitor, resulting in your ability to be the only guy in town, and potentially increase prices whenever you want, is anticompetitive.
Knowing what we know now, the courts will not permit a super ULCC to exist
What if you successfully argue by increasing the size and leverage of the ULCC network you INCREASE competition across the country and can lower prices across the board? DOJ likey.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post