Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
2024: the "Frontier will buy Spirit" theory >

2024: the "Frontier will buy Spirit" theory

Search

Notices

2024: the "Frontier will buy Spirit" theory

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2024, 04:25 PM
  #61  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 35
Default

Originally Posted by westcoastj
So i'm looking at the stock data as a complete noob, but I'm curios what you all think...

When the merger was agreed upon for Frontier to buy Spirit the stock price was Frontier: $12.39 and Spriti was $21.73... I don't know what the market cap was at the time, or if that even matters.

I guess my thinking is as it stands, if Frontier can continue their stock price recovery (even a little bit) I see no reason they could not afford to buy Spirit. That's what I heard for the last 6 months, that Frontier was worthless and could not aquire Spirit anymore.

Frontier is trading now at $7.57 and Spirit is all the way down too $6.65...,

If anything, Indigo would be getting a steal if they could buy them for maybe 10-15 bucks a share.

How long would it take for Frontier to try to secure an aquisition if the apeal is struck down by the courts?

I do think there's a case to be made that combining to become a larger ULCC is good for the consumer. When you think about the opposing side, Jetblue is not really a LCC... They have premuim lie-flat seating on international flights to euorpe. It's not even comparable to someone like Frontier who is a full blown ULCC.

Okay, i'll step off my soap-box, but seriosly... I would be schocked if they did not put a bid in by the end of the summer/fall
I'd expect them to see how the election plays out. So nothing before Nov.
covid19 is offline  
Old 02-25-2024, 02:59 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,514
Default

Originally Posted by covid19
I'd expect them to see how the election plays out. So nothing before Nov.
could always start the process 6 months before and by the time Sleepy Joe wants to block it, he’ll be gone. The biggest issue from the courts we’re Eliminating a ULCC. F9/NK, is not eliminating a ULCC.
Chimpy is online now  
Old 02-25-2024, 01:39 PM
  #63  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 36
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
could always start the process 6 months before and by the time Sleepy Joe wants to block it, he’ll be gone. The biggest issue from the courts we’re Eliminating a ULCC. F9/NK, is not eliminating a ULCC.
Or Donny loses again and they waste their time and money. I'm glad people like you aren't in charge.
F9Driver is offline  
Old 02-25-2024, 01:44 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,311
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
could always start the process 6 months before and by the time Sleepy Joe wants to block it, he’ll be gone. The biggest issue from the courts we’re Eliminating a ULCC. F9/NK, is not eliminating a ULCC.
F9+NK= two ULCCS, Spirit, and Frontier, becoming one- Frontier.

F9+NK results in the elimination of a ULCC (Spirit). That is how the current administration will see it.
hercretired is offline  
Old 02-25-2024, 02:03 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 333
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
F9+NK= two ULCCS, Spirit, and Frontier, becoming one- Frontier.

F9+NK results in the elimination of a ULCC (Spirit). That is how the current administration will see it.
I thought the judge/administration was worried about the elimination of ULCC seats? JetBlue was to reconfigure Spirit planes with less seats. Frontier + Spirit wouldn’t decrease the amount of seating for poors.
CatPilot1 is online now  
Old 02-25-2024, 02:13 PM
  #66  
Almost there
 
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,283
Default

Originally Posted by CatPilot1
I thought the judge/administration was worried about the elimination of ULCC seats? JetBlue was to reconfigure Spirit planes with less seats. Frontier + Spirit wouldn’t decrease the amount of seating for poors.
The big reason was the raising of fares to make flying unaffordable for some. F9 and Allegiant wouldn’t be able to replace NK for 10ish years so the judge ruled the Clayton act was violated. The merger was too anticompetitive. There also is a clause about monopolies in the Clayton act so Herc could be correct.
Stayontarget is online now  
Old 02-25-2024, 02:30 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,476
Default

I think the courts likely would allow the F9 NK merger to happen,, but the question is, does Frontier still want Spirit?

And I don't think they do.
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 02-25-2024, 04:09 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,514
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
F9+NK= two ULCCS, Spirit, and Frontier, becoming one- Frontier.

F9+NK results in the elimination of a ULCC (Spirit). That is how the current administration will see it.
ehh, hard to say. yes NK is gone, but F9 is now twice the size. It's apples to Oranges compared to NK/B6. No idea if F9 would be interested but reading through the Judges ruling, It seems it would face less opposition is all.
Chimpy is online now  
Old 02-25-2024, 05:31 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,311
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
ehh, hard to say. yes NK is gone, but F9 is now twice the size. It's apples to Oranges compared to NK/B6. No idea if F9 would be interested but reading through the Judges ruling, It seems it would face less opposition is all.
From the DOJ press release:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-statements-district-court-decision-block-jetblues-acquisition-spirit

The court found that JetBlue’s proposed takeover of Spirit is unlawful because it “does violence to the core principle of antitrust law: to protect the United States’ markets – and its market participants – from anticompetitive harm.”
Anticompetitive. Hold that thought, lets look at the Clayton Act

https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-laws-and-you

The Clayton Act

This law aims to promote fair competition and prevent unfair business practices that could harm consumers. It prohibits certain actions that might restrict competition, like tying agreements, predatory pricing, and mergers that could lessen competition.
What exactly is "anticompetitive"

Harvard Law journal: https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-130/antitrust-law-is-not-that-complicated/

They define it as:

...anticompetitive conduct, which is conduct that tends to cause an increase in market power for reasons other than competition on the merits.
In other words, offering a better quality widget, with better customer service, thus resulting in increased profits because you charge more, but the customer still comes because he thinks you are better, is not anticompetitive. That is "business 101."

But Merging with a competitor, resulting in your ability to be the only guy in town, and potentially increase prices whenever you want, is anticompetitive.

Knowing what we know now, the courts will not permit a super ULCC to exist
hercretired is offline  
Old 02-25-2024, 05:57 PM
  #70  
Almost there
 
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,283
Default

Originally Posted by hercretired
From the DOJ press release:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-statements-district-court-decision-block-jetblues-acquisition-spirit



Anticompetitive. Hold that thought, lets look at the Clayton Act

https://www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-laws-and-you



What exactly is "anticompetitive"

Harvard Law journal: https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-130/antitrust-law-is-not-that-complicated/

They define it as:



In other words, offering a better quality widget, with better customer service, thus resulting in increased profits because you charge more, but the customer still comes because he thinks you are better, is not anticompetitive. That is "business 101."

But Merging with a competitor, resulting in your ability to be the only guy in town, and potentially increase prices whenever you want, is anticompetitive.

Knowing what we know now, the courts will not permit a super ULCC to exist
…anticompetitive conduct, which is conduct that tends to cause an increase in market power for reasons other than competition on the merits.


What if you successfully argue by increasing the size and leverage of the ULCC network you INCREASE competition across the country and can lower prices across the board? DOJ likey.
Stayontarget is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mxaexm
Hangar Talk
146
01-03-2013 01:19 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices