Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
How long for a contract? >

How long for a contract?

Search

Notices

How long for a contract?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2024, 01:55 PM
  #631  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 268
Default

Originally Posted by Planedrive
My hope for a new contract has reached an all time low.

Frontier is currently operating with a 0% margin for the second year in a row, so it's unlikely we'll secure a contract any time soon. The company simply doesn't have any money to offer. If we were to get the $200 million in contract gains we're aiming for, it would potentially push the company out of business.

I guess if you want a career contract it’s time to start looking outside this airline.
barry sure loves having you here
Mooneyguy is offline  
Old 08-08-2024, 02:23 PM
  #632  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by spooldup

What affects our performance? Lack of gates (they get rid of them in DEN... no idea why), lack of customer service, and lack of rampers.
It seems all levels of operations on the corporate side have a very stunted ability to look down the road. For example if there is an MEL that requires some sort of MX procedure before each leg, have those resources ready when the aircraft arrives. The resources have to be utilized anyway. So, what is the problem? Is it too costly to think ahead? This example almost always turns into a circus and a delay and I have even experienced timing out and flight cancellations over it. I can't imagine the latter being more profitable than the former.

there are so many "cost neutral" things the company could do to make us efficient and profitable. Mostly just thinking is involved.

My question is, what is the company worth to Franke? Could he just take it or leave it? No big deal if it all goes under? In this contract negotiation we should be willing to remain rigid and force that question to the people that have been reaping the benefits of running a leasing company rather than an airline.

It's true in our current condition F9 can't afford to pay us a penny more. A proper contract would mean changing the way the company operates to afford the new contract. My 3 cents. (Inflation)
AutoBrksMedium is offline  
Old 08-23-2024, 02:27 PM
  #633  
Almost there
 
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,283
Default

Nn #36 tldr:

Fupm.
Stayontarget is offline  
Old 08-23-2024, 08:29 PM
  #634  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinsilvia666's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 673
Default

Originally Posted by Stayontarget
Nn #36 tldr:

Fupm.
agreed. Fupm. Everyone be extra safe out there
sinsilvia666 is offline  
Old 08-24-2024, 12:19 AM
  #635  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by AutoBrksMedium
It seems all levels of operations on the corporate side have a very stunted ability to look down the road. For example if there is an MEL that requires some sort of MX procedure before each leg, have those resources ready when the aircraft arrives. The resources have to be utilized anyway. So, what is the problem? Is it too costly to think ahead? This example almost always turns into a circus and a delay and I have even experienced timing out and flight cancellations over it. I can't imagine the latter being more profitable than the former.

there are so many "cost neutral" things the company could do to make us efficient and profitable. Mostly just thinking is involved.

My question is, what is the company worth to Franke? Could he just take it or leave it? No big deal if it all goes under? In this contract negotiation we should be willing to remain rigid and force that question to the people that have been reaping the benefits of running a leasing company rather than an airline.

It's true in our current condition F9 can't afford to pay us a penny more. A proper contract would mean changing the way the company operates to afford the new contract. My 3 cents. (Inflation)
At this point I have a bad feeling that we won’t be seeing a contract. F9 will be lucky if it stays in business. Everything Spirit is trying isn’t working and without those leasebacks F9 would have been in negatives. These routes are failing, the profits aren’t based on flying, and there is no way a judge will allow a failing / unprofitable airline strike. Even worse by the time if f9 gets something, delta will be opening their compensation sectiion again.
DontStahl320 is offline  
Old 08-24-2024, 02:51 AM
  #636  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by DontStahl320
At this point I have a bad feeling that we won’t be seeing a contract. F9 will be lucky if it stays in business. Everything Spirit is trying isn’t working and without those leasebacks F9 would have been in negatives. These routes are failing, the profits aren’t based on flying, and there is no way a judge will allow a failing / unprofitable airline strike. Even worse by the time if f9 gets something, delta will be opening their compensation sectiion again.
We’ll get a contract when the majors are a year out from opening negotiations. Keep us one cycle behind. The only thing that will delay that are Cadets and a steady stream of new hires.
ERAUAV8R is offline  
Old 08-24-2024, 08:24 AM
  #637  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by ERAUAV8R
We’ll get a contract when the majors are a year out from opening negotiations. Keep us one cycle behind. The only thing that will delay that are Cadets and a steady stream of new hires.
Wow. I actually completely agree with everything you just said here.

I think that’s been the plan all along. Guys will get fed up and take what is offered. It’ll be sub par, but eventually they’ll be worn down enough to take it.
HSCompressor is offline  
Old 08-24-2024, 05:24 PM
  #638  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 641
Default

Originally Posted by DontStahl320
At this point I have a bad feeling that we won’t be seeing a contract. F9 will be lucky if it stays in business. Everything Spirit is trying isn’t working and without those leasebacks F9 would have been in negatives. These routes are failing, the profits aren’t based on flying, and there is no way a judge will allow a failing / unprofitable airline strike. Even worse by the time if f9 gets something, delta will be opening their compensation sectiion again.
It has been stated before, the sale lease back transactions are NOT part of revenue, they are a line item on the balance sheet. Not a penny from a SLB is baked into the net profit. You can read about the SLB transactions in the 10k and 10q and you can see the actual line item on the balance sheet. You can also read the "fare revenue" as well as the "non-fare revenue", it is all in black and white. Please stop suggesting the only reason F9 turns a profit is because they execute a sale lease back, it has absolutely nothing to do with profits and losses.

The filing labels SLB's as "Gains recognized on sale-leaseback transactions" and the average return is around $5 million per SLB (each agreement is different, one might be $3 and one might be $7). The gains recognized on sale-leaseback transactions is entered AFTER net income. In other words, all expenses are deducted from all revenue (eight line items of revenue, none including SLB's) and then SLB's are added to the balance sheet.

Unrelated to SLB's but related to your post, comparing what Spirit is doing to what F9 is doing is futile and meaningless. We both fly airbus and we both operate a ULCC model. That is where the similarity ends. One turned another profit last quarter, one is operating at a negative double digit margin (with esimates going as low as -30% margin). One has zero long term debt (zero, only aircraft deliveries and PDP's which can be deferred), the other has more than $3 billion in debt. I could go on and on, but I hope you get the point.
zoooropa is offline  
Old 08-24-2024, 06:53 PM
  #639  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 193
Default

Originally Posted by zoooropa

Unrelated to SLB's but related to your post, comparing what Spirit is doing to what F9 is doing is futile and meaningless. We both fly airbus and we both operate a ULCC model. That is where the similarity ends. One turned another profit last quarter, one is operating at a negative double digit margin (with esimates going as low as -30% margin). One has zero long term debt (zero, only aircraft deliveries and PDP's which can be deferred), the other has more than $3 billion in debt. I could go on and on, but I hope you get the point.
Here’s another key difference discussed in some detail. https://weekly.visualapproach.io/p/s...asm-casm-chasm
BobSacamano is offline  
Old 08-25-2024, 05:09 AM
  #640  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Chimpy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,520
Default

Originally Posted by zoooropa
It has been stated before, the sale lease back transactions are NOT part of revenue, they are a line item on the balance sheet. Not a penny from a SLB is baked into the net profit. You can read about the SLB transactions in the 10k and 10q and you can see the actual line item on the balance sheet. You can also read the "fare revenue" as well as the "non-fare revenue", it is all in black and white. Please stop suggesting the only reason F9 turns a profit is because they execute a sale lease back, it has absolutely nothing to do with profits and losses.

The filing labels SLB's as "Gains recognized on sale-leaseback transactions" and the average return is around $5 million per SLB (each agreement is different, one might be $3 and one might be $7). The gains recognized on sale-leaseback transactions is entered AFTER net income. In other words, all expenses are deducted from all revenue (eight line items of revenue, none including SLB's) and then SLB's are added to the balance sheet.

Unrelated to SLB's but related to your post, comparing what Spirit is doing to what F9 is doing is futile and meaningless. We both fly airbus and we both operate a ULCC model. That is where the similarity ends. One turned another profit last quarter, one is operating at a negative double digit margin (with esimates going as low as -30% margin). One has zero long term debt (zero, only aircraft deliveries and PDP's which can be deferred), the other has more than $3 billion in debt. I could go on and on, but I hope you get the point.
"Put another way, with Spirit’s labor costs, Frontier would have posted an operating loss of 11.6%."

You guys are by no means in good shape and I wouldnt expect a CBA anytime soon. Good luck
Chimpy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
CAL73CAPT
United
18
01-16-2011 07:46 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices