Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
How long for a contract? >

How long for a contract?

Search

Notices

How long for a contract?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2024, 07:38 AM
  #461  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by Stayontarget
And yet if they all worked together, in unity, to not pick up every second of open time the premium would flow like water. And perhaps if they worked together, in unity, to not pick up that premium in 0.02 seconds the payout for that premium would go higher. Other surprising benefits may begin to show up beyond that. It sounds impossible at this point but that’s exactly how it used to happen just two years ago. People used to drop their schedules and just wait. It was a glorious time where by working together everybody made their own lives better.
.
Exactly.

Planedrive got all high and mighty about me saying just pick up the premium. But, that’s like trying to bail water on the Titanic to get it to port. There’s still a giant gaping hole in the damn thing.

If you really wanna stick it to Barry, if you really want more premium open time, stop picking up so much for godd#mn straight pay.

Hows about that for running for union office?
HSCompressor is offline  
Old 04-15-2024, 01:26 PM
  #462  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 427
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
This really is a silly argument. You're not wrong in what you're saying, but we have 2100+ pilots. Does anyone really think we could get ALL of them to not pick up ANY open time? I doubt we could get 210 to stop. Unity like that from a group that VOTED IN the current contract at 70% last cycle?
I didn’t really say it like that.

The original conversation was regarding picking up premium and not doing it.

All I said was don’t cry about premium, if you’re going to turn a blind eye to straight pay open time.

I wasn’t advocating for the pilot group (as you said) to engage in any sort of collective action to subvert the system. In fact that would probably be trouble.
HSCompressor is offline  
Old 04-15-2024, 01:48 PM
  #463  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 103
Default

I think there are a number of changes in the training department to accommodate the issues cadets are having and some of those changes can't happen without the union being onboard. That could be the leverage needed to move things along.
AutoBrksMedium is offline  
Old 04-15-2024, 02:17 PM
  #464  
Line holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by AutoBrksMedium
I think there are a number of changes in the training department to accommodate the issues cadets are having and some of those changes can't happen without the union being onboard. That could be the leverage needed to move things along.

You want to elaborate?
av8nallday is offline  
Old 04-15-2024, 05:04 PM
  #465  
Gets Weekends Off
 
madmax757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: seated - facing forward
Posts: 1,070
Default

Originally Posted by av8nallday
You want to elaborate?
I recall when the Company wanted to change the “oral” portion of a PC and PT to CBT. That way they could jam more stuff on our already overwhelming And unrealistic LOS and UPRT. I personally wouldn’t mind that orals are very subjective. I can answer multiple choice questions better and focus on more
important things. The union said sure but you have to pay us. Guess how that ended up?
madmax757 is offline  
Old 04-16-2024, 12:25 AM
  #466  
Line holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by madmax757
I recall when the Company wanted to change the “oral” portion of a PC and PT to CBT. That way they could jam more stuff on our already overwhelming And unrealistic LOS and UPRT. I personally wouldn’t mind that orals are very subjective. I can answer multiple choice questions better and focus on more
important things. The union said sure but you have to pay us. Guess how that ended up?

Yeah we do. 17 hours of pay for 5 days being gone for a PC is a joke as well. I was just talking with someone the other day how our LOS events are unrealistic and let’s just throw as much crap as possible to see how they handle it. It would be nice if it was more real world applicable.
av8nallday is offline  
Old 04-16-2024, 04:20 AM
  #467  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by av8nallday
You want to elaborate?
there are changes frontier wants to make in the training department. Some of these changes are being blocked by the union. Blocked = Leverage. If it's something the company wants bad enough then it can lead to a new contract.
AutoBrksMedium is offline  
Old 04-16-2024, 07:29 AM
  #468  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SeaRider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: El Capitan de Airbii
Posts: 287
Default

Originally Posted by AutoBrksMedium
Blocked = Leverage.
If the union had had any cojones, they would have done the same with SJU LOA. But as usual, they want to show 'good faith' that no one of importance seems to notice or care about; the same good faith the company is never required to display.
SeaRider is offline  
Old 04-16-2024, 07:50 AM
  #469  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,147
Default

Originally Posted by SeaRider
If the union had had any cojones, they would have done the same with SJU LOA. But as usual, they want to show 'good faith' that no one of importance seems to notice or care about; the same good faith the company is never required to display.
It’s frustrating no doubt. Keep in mind sometimes at some point you need to get something done or there’s a chance an arbitrator could force a much worse agreement. You would need to know other carrier agreements, past practice and our current agreement and compare them to the loa that was done to determine if you believe it’s worth rolling the dice in arbitration and potentially ending up with a worse deal. Stone walling forever isn’t really an option.
fcoolaiddrinker is offline  
Old 04-16-2024, 07:50 AM
  #470  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 158
Default

Originally Posted by SeaRider
If the union had had any cojones, they would have done the same with SJU LOA. But as usual, they want to show 'good faith' that no one of importance seems to notice or care about; the same good faith the company is never required to display.
The SJU LOA was a litmus test to show the negotiating skills of the NC. Or lack there of.
fivebyfive is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
CAL73CAPT
United
18
01-16-2011 07:46 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices