Search

Notices

Contract 2023

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2023, 07:48 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by Powderkeg
Contrary to popular opinion I think this is something that needs to go. It’s a valuable piece of negotiating capital, and if the rates are high enough you’ll never notice. This would also drive more open time, more pilots required to staff the high utilization rates, and a QOL improvement for anybody that decided they could afford to work less.

Imagine a world in which you didn’t have to credit 100 hours a month with 12 days off to feel like you can buy a Miata that’s as nice as your neighbor’s that flies for Delta.
This is a good post. 1.25 over 82 is unique to Frontier, and I’d be willing to part with it, but absolutely not unless we are offered pay rates that are substantially better than what Spirit just signed.
BufordT Justice is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 08:07 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,182
Default

200% premium would be a must if the 125% were to go away. Giving up any soft time is a bad idea imo. You’ll never get it back. And I’m rarely over 82. Payrates can go down in a recession/downturn. It’s tough to get a judge to readjust/takeaway provisions.
fcoolaiddrinker is online now  
Old 02-24-2023, 08:36 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Position: Joystick Operator
Posts: 923
Default

-Pay realistically somewhere between the DAL 321-321NEO rates. Especially since we have more pax in our 320s and are transitioning to receiving a ton of 321neos.
-LTD own occupation of AT LEAST 20 years. (id like to see to 65)
-401k contribution increased to 18%
-Min DAY guarantee. No more of this 3 day 11hr redeye stuff.
-Min days off for reserve and lineholders 13/14 with the ability for reserves to drop 2 days on "low credit months"
-Intl. per diem and a per diem increase
-Redeye/intl override
-16-18hr long call
-3hr short call (this would also incentivize CS to offer premium more due to not being able to instantly get a pilot somewhere)
-Drop to 0. Probably wont happen, but dropping below 65hrs any month would be nice, even if it is just to 40.
-Lower insurance costs
-FLICA paid for
-Medical paid for each year
-Only F9 pilots touch F9 metal
-IF CS is not going to be offering much premium and stuffing reserves into all open trips first, then I want to see ALL open time pick up increased to 125% baseline.
-If/when we get wifi onboard, pilots get free access.


oh yeah, and NO concessions. Not in this market. I dont think any of this is unrealistic to ask for.
spooldup is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 08:43 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: Happy
Posts: 683
Default

No concessions on anything. Vaca rules stay as well therefore. Two weeks of vaca got me the entire month off with sliding and stretching for 75 hours. That should stay that way.

DL 321 rates as a minimum. We’re flying 240 pax in them soon for crying out loud. 1 for 1 same rate or better. Over 82 can stay but I shouldn’t have to work more to get paid the same as my neighbors so
rates need to be 1 for 1 the same. We fly more pax and do more for less. So pay up.

18% DC.

LTD I improvements.

Serious language for company violating CBA when they are found in the wrong.

That’s all I can come up with after 3 coffees. Carry on.
303flyboy is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 10:31 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 321
Default

Getting rid of 1.25% over 82 is a concession. Absolutely 0 reason to give a single concession in this environment.

Jetblue/ Spirit rates are a bridge for the JCBA they are about to start negotiating. We definitely need to be negotiating well above that.
Planedrive is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 10:54 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 687
Default

Originally Posted by Planedrive
Getting rid of 1.25% over 82 is a concession. Absolutely 0 reason to give a single concession in this environment.

Jetblue/ Spirit rates are a bridge for the JCBA they are about to start negotiating. We definitely need to be negotiating well above that.
It’s not a concession if something else is negotiated that is of equal or greater value. Personally, as a minimum credit flyer, that item isn’t doing much for me. I agree that I’d rather see higher rates than keep the 1.25 over 82. That rule makes it much easier for the company to short-staff the airline.
turbojet28 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 10:57 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,490
Default

Originally Posted by Planedrive
Getting rid of 1.25% over 82 is a concession. Absolutely 0 reason to give a single concession in this environment.

Jetblue/ Spirit rates are a bridge for the JCBA they are about to start negotiating. We definitely need to be negotiating well above that.
Agreed. The JetBlue rates aren't too bad. The Spirit rates are a good bit behind though. $14/ hour lower at the top of the scale and a bit more lower on the scale. For us, JetBlue rates are the low bar to shoot for. The Spirit rates really shouldn't even be considered as part of the industry averages
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 11:13 AM
  #38  
Almost there
 
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,344
Default

In addition to what I have seen…

-Holiday pay

-IF they aren’t willing to give us straight DL 321 pay they had better put at 321 override % in

-PS

-Snap up

-IF we get XLRs before the next round of negotiations we had better be prepared with long haul provisions (crew rest, DH, food, ect)
Stayontarget is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 11:19 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,442
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900
As I explained in a previous post, we will be negotiating off of all the other industry contracts. Pattern bargaining. We will be the last to go and will almost certainly have every other airlines new contract to compare to and bargain off of.
This is the same sentiment that was said last negotiation - right up until the point where a bottom of the industry TA was sent out for vote (that included a line generator called PBS that the NC said they would absolutely never accept).

There are too many around who still remember…

As for rates, there’s no way I’m voting for anything less than that of an average of the top 5 of 767/321 rates. Unless we have a snap up (which is, in essence, getting the same thing).
dracir1 is offline  
Old 02-24-2023, 11:27 AM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 66
Default

No one's mentioned a reduction in the banding/slope of the payscale, but I think it's pretty important to the newer folks. And maybe important to the company for recruiting and attrition. I keep hearing that the last contract focused on rates at the top of scale since the airline was top heavy, but that's not the situation any more. It's currently a pretty large pay cut to come here versus 2-3+ year regional captain pay and takes years to break even.
Beehan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Flyrr
Flexjet
20
04-30-2018 08:00 AM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices