Search

Notices

Contract 2023

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2023, 10:30 AM
  #121  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 29
Default

The premium system is unfair, but I don’t think it’s a priority for the one premium trip that pops up every full moon. We have a lot more important items on the list. We should focus on working less making more instead of the other way around.(over 82, premium etc.)
Buspilot99 is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 10:51 AM
  #122  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 55
Default

Current premium benefits neither senior, Jr., those in the middle, Hard workers, or those not so hard working

Who it benefits at this point is questionable.

What about disbanding the premium system and just expanding the 125% after 82 hr system? 150-% after 82 or something?.
AlternateLaw is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 10:52 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Position: Joystick Operator
Posts: 927
Default

Remove premium, keep the over 82, and increase ALL open time pick ups to 150%.
spooldup is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 11:00 AM
  #124  
Almost there
 
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,346
Default

Originally Posted by spooldup
Remove premium, keep the over 82, and increase ALL open time pick ups to 150%.
So you would just drop your trip to pick it right back up again at 150%?
Stayontarget is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 11:32 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2021
Position: Joystick Operator
Posts: 927
Default

Originally Posted by Stayontarget
So you would just drop your trip to pick it right back up again at 150%?
exactly.

no but seriously, there needs to be something done about it. Premium sounds nice, but there is never any of it. The over 82 sounds nice, but you have to work hard for it. Id rather just take flat higher rates and lose the over 82 and keep premium.
spooldup is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 11:41 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: ce560
Posts: 231
Default

Ditch the 1.25 for a 5:30 min day.
That 10 hour 3 day is now worth 16:30
vs 12:30 with the 25% over 82..
singlepilot is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 11:47 AM
  #127  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 29
Default

Originally Posted by spooldup
exactly.

no but seriously, there needs to be something done about it. Premium sounds nice, but there is never any of it. The over 82 sounds nice, but you have to work hard for it. Id rather just take flat higher rates and lose the over 82 and keep premium.
Yes higher pay rates, and improved soft pay. Day off begins at 1201 for everything else in our life not 2 am. We need 321, red eye and intl overrides. Min day…. not min duty day at least 6 hours. 15 days off for reserves and mmg 82 hours like WN. Premium isn’t going anywhere bl has come into our rgs raging how much he loves it.
Buspilot99 is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 12:02 PM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,443
Default

Originally Posted by spooldup
exactly.

no but seriously, there needs to be something done about it. Premium sounds nice, but there is never any of it. The over 82 sounds nice, but you have to work hard for it. Id rather just take flat higher rates and lose the over 82 and keep premium.
I agree.

Swap out over 82 for a min day (and it's calendar date) of 5:15. Premium stays exactly like it is.

And better rates solves lots of issues - everyone is happier working here and everyone will want to come here. Recruiting/retention is probably 75% rates and 25% other things.
dracir1 is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 01:03 PM
  #129  
Almost there
 
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,346
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
I agree.

Swap out over 82 for a min day (and it's calendar date) of 5:15. Premium stays exactly like it is.

And better rates solves lots of issues - everyone is happier working here and everyone will want to come here. Recruiting/retention is probably 75% rates and 25% other things.
Does 82 need really to be swapped with anything? It’s mutually beneficial. I guess if it’s at the expense of hourly rates then sure but that shouldn’t be the case. Total compensation packages should be based on min guarantee if you ask me.


I can see the union getting their hands on trip pairings and having some sort of min 10% of each 4/3/2/1 day trips to help solve many of the issues we are seeing. Hopefully that would solve our 10 hour 3 day and min duty vs calendar day issues, issues with trip commutability, soft time, circadian clock, efficiency…just overall QOL while flying.
Stayontarget is offline  
Old 03-02-2023, 01:28 PM
  #130  
Almost there
 
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,346
Default

Originally Posted by spooldup
exactly.

no but seriously, there needs to be something done about it. Premium sounds nice, but there is never any of it. The over 82 sounds nice, but you have to work hard for it. Id rather just take flat higher rates and lose the over 82 and keep premium.
If a company is being run properly premium shouldn’t exist. It’s just a mechanism for failure. It should certainly never be a selling point as if it is some sort of guarantee we all get. It should not have any bearing on rates since it should technically never happen. But that also means the argument that it should be 200% or more to start shouldn’t be a deal breaker either because again, if you (management) run the company properly 0% of pilots will get premium.
Stayontarget is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Flyrr
Flexjet
20
04-30-2018 08:00 AM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices