Search

Notices

Hiring / training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2019, 10:14 AM
  #381  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 56
Default

Originally Posted by Too Many Bosses
Maybe off topic so I apologize in advance. What is the thought about how implementing PBS will effect QOL for Frontier Pilots.
Will this process benefit the senior group more, the junior pilots, or will it be roughly the same net effect for all? Pros and cons to each side?

TMB
In the RJ world, PBS really favored the senior group. I’m curious to see what it will look like for us though.
PC12 is offline  
Old 04-20-2019, 10:29 AM
  #382  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,182
Default

Originally Posted by CantStayAway
It hasn’t been discussed much as most of us don’t know. Having worked under PBS before I will say I believe it will benefit the very senior and the very junior the most.

As a junior pilot stuck on perpetual reserve, a week of vacation may actually be the ticket to holding a line one month while there are a lot of guys senior to you on reserve. That was one thing that really bothered me about PBS at my previous airline, but it comes with the territory.

The senior pilots will get to cherry pick their trips and still take advantage (although not quite as much as current book) of working over their vacations.

In general I think we will see less trips available in open time and on the trade board because more people will get what they want in the initial bid.
Vac as a reserve will no doubt will be better than current book. Having said that the grid numbers in the pbs LOA will change. Also there will probably be an added column for all res not just 6*3. There’s issues when applying inviolate days. It’s just not a good idea to negotiate this in public amongst ourselves.

Last edited by fcoolaiddrinker; 04-20-2019 at 10:58 AM.
fcoolaiddrinker is offline  
Old 04-20-2019, 08:18 PM
  #383  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
Default

Originally Posted by CantStayAway
It hasn’t been discussed much as most of us don’t know. Having worked under PBS before I will say I believe it will benefit the very senior and the very junior the most.

As a junior pilot stuck on perpetual reserve, a week of vacation may actually be the ticket to holding a line one month while there are a lot of guys senior to you on reserve. That was one thing that really bothered me about PBS at my previous airline, but it comes with the territory.

The senior pilots will get to cherry pick their trips and still take advantage (although not quite as much as current book) of working over their vacations.

In general I think we will see less trips available in open time and on the trade board because more people will get what they want in the initial bid.
There has to be a minimum of 4% open time available at the beginning of DOT under PBS which is higher than we have been getting but the quality of the trips will likely be the lower end.
Xdashdriver is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 04:27 PM
  #384  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 676
Default

Originally Posted by Xdashdriver
There has to be a minimum of 4% open time available at the beginning of DOT under PBS which is higher than we have been getting but the quality of the trips will likely be the lower end.
Not exactly, at least how I understand it. I think it will be at union scheduling committee discretion but they can withhold UP TO 4% for open time. But they may opt to reduce that amount in favor of awarding more hard lines and honoring more preferences.

But as another poster stated, without a PBS LOA in writing it’s somewhat difficult to predict.
Powderkeg is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 04:32 PM
  #385  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 617
Default

Originally Posted by Powderkeg
Not exactly, at least how I understand it. I think it will be at union scheduling committee discretion but they can withhold UP TO 4% for open time. But they may opt to reduce that amount in favor of awarding more hard lines and honoring more preferences.
This was my understanding as well.
CantStayAway is offline  
Old 04-21-2019, 05:07 PM
  #386  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
Default

Originally Posted by Powderkeg
Not exactly, at least how I understand it. I think it will be at union scheduling committee discretion but they can withhold UP TO 4% for open time. But they may opt to reduce that amount in favor of awarding more hard lines and honoring more preferences.

But as another poster stated, without a PBS LOA in writing it’s somewhat difficult to predict.
I was partially wrong...it's not a minimum, but it's not difficult to predict because the written PBS LOA we already have says "Open time for any bid period shall be 4% of the total bid period pairing credit at the time of Final Schedule." Not a minimum, not a maximum, not at SSC discretion.
Xdashdriver is offline  
Old 04-22-2019, 03:07 AM
  #387  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by ZooKeeper
I think it’s pretty clear the Max problems are only temporary. Remember all the problems the 787 had? Now it’s wildly successful.
The 787 didn't crash, the 738max did.
Boeing is lucky that the 777/787 are successful and that's why you can see that the company still has their head above water. Hopfully they fix this issue for good.
flightlevels is offline  
Old 04-22-2019, 04:43 AM
  #388  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 676
Default

Originally Posted by Xdashdriver
I was partially wrong...it's not a minimum, but it's not difficult to predict because the written PBS LOA we already have says "Open time for any bid period shall be 4% of the total bid period pairing credit at the time of Final Schedule." Not a minimum, not a maximum, not at SSC discretion.
You’re leaving out a key part of the legal-eeze...”Unless mutually agreed to by the JPWG...” precedes the statement you reference.
Powderkeg is offline  
Old 04-22-2019, 12:34 PM
  #389  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,182
Default

Originally Posted by Powderkeg
You’re leaving out a key part of the legal-eeze...”Unless mutually agreed to by the JPWG...” precedes the statement you reference.
That’s leverage for us. Let’s not show them thier leverage just Incase it’s not already abvious to them. We know they read this.
fcoolaiddrinker is offline  
Old 04-22-2019, 12:53 PM
  #390  
Qbicle seat warmer
 
ASpilot2be's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: SAAB FO
Posts: 1,177
Default

Do the airplanes have the dual plug setup or the Airbus plug?
ASpilot2be is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PaulG
Hawaiian
4
10-19-2017 04:24 PM
Lbell911
Regional
34
03-13-2016 04:38 AM
HuggyU2
Part 91 and Low Time
25
03-27-2013 02:24 PM
BTDTB4
Major
29
02-14-2012 12:27 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices