Frontier Negotiations Discussion
#3581
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 180
#3582
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Bus CA
Posts: 660
I think the question people are struggling with in regards to duration is, when is the amendable date? Subtract 6 months from that and you have the early opener to section 6 negotiations.
If the amendable date is in MAR2023 then the contract is slightly over 4 years. If the amendable date is in MAR2024, one year after the last pay bump, then it is slightly over 5 years. I’m guessing it is the latter, because the union emails would have framed it as “slightly over 4 years” if that were the case.
If the amendable date is in MAR2023 then the contract is slightly over 4 years. If the amendable date is in MAR2024, one year after the last pay bump, then it is slightly over 5 years. I’m guessing it is the latter, because the union emails would have framed it as “slightly over 4 years” if that were the case.
#3583
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 180
Yes, I agree. Well put and what I was mentioning just a few posts ago.
How about this for unification - let’s all vote yes IF we can get the contract duration down to 3 years. Maybe even ask for a rate increase of 2% per year for every year after contract is up that we don’t get a new deal (increasing their incentive to negotiate). That way we’re not stuck with this POS for over 5 and will be better equipped to negotiate with whomever owns us by then.
How about this for unification - let’s all vote yes IF we can get the contract duration down to 3 years. Maybe even ask for a rate increase of 2% per year for every year after contract is up that we don’t get a new deal (increasing their incentive to negotiate). That way we’re not stuck with this POS for over 5 and will be better equipped to negotiate with whomever owns us by then.
#3584
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,442
So obviously the contract duration is set, meaning there’s no renegotiating that part. Also, the last two years of the deal up for TA vote are solidifying 3% increases on the largest numbers to date. Also, NO airline in the modern era that’s comparable to us has ever increased at some percentage for the foreseeable near term. The cost of living adjustment argument that’s being thrown around out there goes to show a certain level of general understanding. Cost of living adjustments are used by the Govt and specifically the Social Security Administraton and as a benchmark for low income earners to keep people’s ability to maintain a certain minimum level of living, e.g. the ability to buy milk, bread, need based life essentials. Not to put a new lift-kit or spinners on your Denali.
This company needs some sort of motivation to come back to the table sooner than later. This AIP sucks. We know it but more importantly so do they. Of course, they will try and use every excuse to disallow anything we bring up at this point. I don’t care. I’m not interested in what they call industry standard because this AIP falls way short of that. And while I truly expect a road show where the MEC/NC pats themselves on the back and tells me how this is such as success and how this is the best we’re gonna get, I think there’s more.
That’s why they’re called negotiations.
#3586
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,183
generally once theres a AIP the only issues yet to resolved are grievances that will still be a contract violation under the new contract and when certain items (pay rates, rigs, and other scheduling items) go into effect. Software needs to be updated and configured. Then comes the TA. Their not negotiating much outside that. After TA any issues are normally resolved with LOA's, MOU's, examples and definitions.
#3587
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 180
#3588
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Lineholder
Posts: 1,442
#3590
Slave
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: Hot tub
Posts: 1,411
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post