Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
Frontier Negotiations Discussion >

Frontier Negotiations Discussion

Search

Notices

Frontier Negotiations Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2018, 04:01 PM
  #2941  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 191
Default

Well I do see some life in this group!!! Thank you!!
Need a real job is offline  
Old 11-05-2018, 04:34 PM
  #2942  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 491
Default

Originally Posted by SFA320
They said they would be taking care of the details all this week. So maybe the end of this week, or early next we will have some info. Everything else you are reading is just guessing, or speculating.
I’m betting the details posted so far are pretty accurate.

It’ll take the Union an entire week to assemble the necessary propaganda to launch a full scale sales job.

As they ram this down our throats, please keep in mind how offended you were when you saw the details posted by Mr. Dimpledballs.

Please prepare your rationalization as to why we should be paid LESS than other domestic narrowbody operators. Please consider that the company we work for is MORE profitable than any of the legacies and WN.

Please don’t be impatient and vote in the first offer because you’re scared or because you’d like 30 cents on the dollar in a signing bonus because you’d like to buy a new car or whatever.
OpenClimb is offline  
Old 11-05-2018, 05:41 PM
  #2943  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 497
Default

Originally Posted by OpenClimb
I’m betting the details posted so far are pretty accurate.

It’ll take the Union an entire week to assemble the necessary propaganda to launch a full scale sales job.

As they ram this down our throats, please keep in mind how offended you were when you saw the details posted by Mr. Dimpledballs.

Please prepare your rationalization as to why we should be paid LESS than other domestic narrowbody operators. Please consider that the company we work for is MORE profitable than any of the legacies and WN.

Please don’t be impatient and vote in the first offer because you’re scared or because you’d like 30 cents on the dollar in a signing bonus because you’d like to buy a new car or whatever.
Agree 100%. If those numbers are correct, it’s a complete slap in the face.
Missed Appch is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 01:00 PM
  #2944  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 657
Default

Originally Posted by OpenClimb
.





Please don’t be impatient and vote in the first offer because you’re scared or because you’d like 30 cents on the dollar in a signing bonus because you’d like to buy a new car or whatever.


As someone who works at Spirit please read the details and don’t just look at the $$. I’m constantly surprised by people who are shocked that we can’t do this or that in the new contract. Weather you vote for it or not READ it and don’t look at the money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
flyingpuma1 is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 02:04 PM
  #2945  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 453
Default

Originally Posted by flyingpuma1
As someone who works at Spirit please read the details and don’t just look at the $$. I’m constantly surprised by people who are shocked that we can’t do this or that in the new contract. Weather you vote for it or not READ it and don’t look at the money.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sage advice. Will do.
Wheelswatch is offline  
Old 11-07-2018, 06:53 AM
  #2946  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by OpenClimb
I’m betting the details posted so far are pretty accurate.

It’ll take the Union an entire week to assemble the necessary propaganda to launch a full scale sales job.

As they ram this down our throats, please keep in mind how offended you were when you saw the details posted by Mr. Dimpledballs.

Please prepare your rationalization as to why we should be paid LESS than other domestic narrowbody operators. Please consider that the company we work for is MORE profitable than any of the legacies and WN.

Please don’t be impatient and vote in the first offer because you’re scared or because you’d like 30 cents on the dollar in a signing bonus because you’d like to buy a new car or whatever.
I agree with your last sentence. But F9’s is not more profitable than any of the legacies or WN.
Planepirate is offline  
Old 11-07-2018, 07:05 AM
  #2947  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 497
Default

Assuming the leaked numbers are correct, this thing shouldn’t get past our LEC. Hopefully they will nip this in the bud. I can’t fathom someone voting yes on a new AIP that is so far below industry average.
Missed Appch is offline  
Old 11-07-2018, 07:55 AM
  #2948  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FLYMIA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: CRJ Left
Posts: 268
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
It is my understanding that the company will set the rate for first year with some Caviots. It can’t be more than year 2. Once they set it it can’t go down. So based on that I’m going to GUESS mid 60 to low 70ish? It’s the reason for first year going down from our original proposal. It lowered our overall monetary ask (to use in other areas) and we know they are going to have to raise it. Make them pay for it. Waiting patiently for language. Disclaimer, This information is based on a discussion with the NC chairman about a month ago when discussing our new proposed pay rates. No idea if it made it into the soon to be AIP?
Sorry if i'm not quite understanding this. Are you saying, because the company will not be able to lower first year pay in the future it is the reason year 1 will be lower from the original ask of 70? Or is it a combination of that and lowering the ask from first year pay to apply in other areas of the contract?
FLYMIA is offline  
Old 11-07-2018, 08:40 AM
  #2949  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TrojanCMH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,269
Default

Originally Posted by FLYMIA
Sorry if i'm not quite understanding this. Are you saying, because the company will not be able to lower first year pay in the future it is the reason year 1 will be lower from the original ask of 70? Or is it a combination of that and lowering the ask from first year pay to apply in other areas of the contract?


It’s common for airline unions to let the company dictate what first year pay will be. I think the union mindset is that they’re on probation and it’s not their job to attract new hires and therefore not worth the negotiating capital. I don’t necessarily agree but I’ve been through two contracts with different companies and each time that’s the logic they fed us.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TrojanCMH is offline  
Old 11-07-2018, 09:03 AM
  #2950  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FLYMIA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: CRJ Left
Posts: 268
Default

Originally Posted by TrojanCMH
It’s common for airline unions to let the company dictate what first year pay will be. I think the union mindset is that they’re on probation and it’s not their job to attract new hires and therefore not worth the negotiating capital. I don’t necessarily agree but I’ve been through two contracts with different companies and each time that’s the logic they fed us.
This makes sense. I guess I just don't understand the logic from the company's end that they should have a lower first year pay than say, what spirit has right now. Again, this is above my head and i'm patiently watching from the outside.
FLYMIA is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
319wisperer
Frontier
9479
06-20-2019 11:31 AM
Ravensvic
Frontier
71
10-18-2012 06:56 PM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices