Russian carrier taking off with snow on wings
#31
#34
I believe that you may be confusing the terms deicing and anti-icing. In the conditions you described, deicing was appropriate and anti-icing woud have been required by my company's SOP with visible moisture (rain) and temperature of + 4. Further, don't underestimate the liability and accountability consequences should you decide to "save" a few minutes by not deicing.
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 879
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=925MgqyU2NA&sns=em
Last edited by FAULTPUSH; 04-19-2012 at 05:21 PM.
#37
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 879
#40
New Hire
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: MD11 Captain
Posts: 4
Generally speaking:
I remember a FAA publication a couple of year ago regarding contamination on wings (it was pinned to a board in our briefing room). In it was written, that a contamination the size of one grain of sand per square centimeter could impede lift by up to 30%.
With that information it should be clear, why SOPs ask for a clean wing prior to departure. Of course, most aircraft could deal with a certain amount of contamination without any problems - having thrus on all engines available. But what happens in case you loose an engine after V1. With decreased lift on your wings AND a failed engine you would be in for a nice treat...
As for the comment of one of the other posters before concerning the fact that de-icing fluid also has an impact on lift; Whilst that might be correct, we are talking about certified fluids whose characteristics have been thouroughly tested and certified for ops. Snow is not! You might THINK that the snow will blow off, but you can never be sure what will really happen during takoff roll.
Cheers,
DBate
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post