Search

Notices
Foreign Airlines that hire U.S. pilots

Air France 447

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2009, 09:33 AM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: looking for work
Posts: 88
Default

well that is an american news station for you huh?
FlywithStyle is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:38 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 /FO
Posts: 345
Default

I should have posted this instead, since most poeple are more likely to watch a youtube than read.

YouTube - A Pilot's Tour of ADS-B
SebastianDesoto is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:44 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 354
Default

Originally Posted by SebastianDesoto
I should have posted this instead, since most poeple are more likely to watch a youtube than read.

YouTube - A Pilot's Tour of ADS-B
Maybe, but an 8 minute video?
mynameisjim is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:54 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 /FO
Posts: 345
Default

Originally Posted by mynameisjim
Maybe, but an 8 minute video?
Heh, there are even better tutorials to, but i only spent a couple minutes finding it.

By the way, I apologize for almost turning this thread into an ADS-B thread. It would not likely have helped in this case.

I fear the worst in this case. Hope for the best.
SebastianDesoto is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 10:02 AM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 86
Default

Originally Posted by Talon1011
To my knowledge Turbulence (CAT) has often caused damage but has never caused a hull loss. Thunderstorms, on the other hand, have caused a great many.
Here are two examples that come to mind right away that associate extreme turbulence with hull loss. There are more but I don't remember the specifics.

I thought that Clear Air Turbulence (CAT) is associated with the jet stream and/or winds aloft rather than weather.....in the case of the BOAC flight, the turbulence could be CAT as no convective in area at time of accident.


BOAC Flight 911 707-436 Series, Mt Fuji, Japan
5 Mar 1966

124 fatalities

11 Crew
113 Passengers

In-flight breakup

From accident investigation report: "Probable cause - The aircraft suddenly encountered abnormally severe turbulence over Gotemba City which imposed a gust load considerably in excess of the design limit."


Braniff Flight 250 BAC 1-11 200 series, Falls City, Nebraska
6 Aug 1966

42 fatalieites

4 Crew
38 Passengers

In-flight breakup
From accident investigation report: "Probable cause: Inflight structrual failure caused by extreme turbulence during operation of the aircraft in an area of avoidable hazardous weather"

Last edited by RickJames; 06-01-2009 at 10:21 AM. Reason: Format
RickJames is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 10:09 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PiperPower's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 317
Default

From CNN

"There is no reason they can not land in the water, as we've seen. Planes have floats."
PiperPower is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 10:13 AM
  #37  
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
SoCalGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Posts: 2,086
Default

Originally Posted by PiperPower
From CNN

"There is no reason they can not land in the water, as we've seen. Planes have floats."
"Just the media being the media".....wow, somethings don't change.

Must have missed that day in G.S. when they talk about the optional floats.

Regardless of the media's "professional reporting", the story is sad all the way around.
SoCalGuy is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 10:25 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bri85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 606
Default

Originally Posted by olympic
Did CNN just say this ???

CNN: "They do quite well if ditched by an experienced pilot as we've seen"




Sure ditching on a River is cake when is day, the winds are calm and the water is glassy instead of ditching at night, with a major electrical failure in the ocean where is pitch black during a thunderstorm with 10-12 feet swells, coming from all directions. CNN & FoxNews are a bunch of clownshoes...


My condolences to the family of the passengers and pilots, im sure they tried their best.
Bri85 is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 10:47 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
alvrb211's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,045
Default

Originally Posted by RickJames
Here are two examples that come to mind right away that associate extreme turbulence with hull loss. There are more but I don't remember the specifics.

I thought that Clear Air Turbulence (CAT) is associated with the jet stream and/or winds aloft rather than weather.....in the case of the BOAC flight, the turbulence could be CAT as no convective in area at time of accident.


BOAC Flight 911 707-436 Series, Mt Fuji, Japan
5 Mar 1966

124 fatalities

11 Crew
113 Passengers

In-flight breakup

From accident investigation report: "Probable cause - The aircraft suddenly encountered abnormally severe turbulence over Gotemba City which imposed a gust load considerably in excess of the design limit."


Braniff Flight 250 BAC 1-11 200 series, Falls City, Nebraska
6 Aug 1966

42 fatalieites

4 Crew
38 Passengers

In-flight breakup
From accident investigation report: "Probable cause: Inflight structrual failure caused by extreme turbulence during operation of the aircraft in an area of avoidable hazardous weather"
The name "clear air turbulence" is kinda misleading.

CAT does not only occur in VMC.

AL
alvrb211 is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 11:33 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,818
Default

It may not be popular opinion, but I'd rather go back to the early days without radar, ADS-B, glass-cockpits, etc...it makes a better Pilot, and as you know, we still lose hulls with all this technology...

Last edited by ExperimentalAB; 06-01-2009 at 02:21 PM.
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tr disagree
Hangar Talk
1
06-26-2009 09:55 PM
andy171773
Major
56
06-22-2009 01:48 PM
HectorD
Hangar Talk
2
06-01-2009 08:57 AM
ol'tigerguy
Cargo
8
02-24-2009 04:29 PM
cencal83406
Regional
17
02-03-2009 08:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices