Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

PIC during ME training?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2011, 05:19 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 650
Default PIC during ME training?

I had a guy tell me that there was an endorsment that your instructor could give you to log PIC during ME training. Any truth to this? Or is this part of the endorsment you would get if you had to fly solo to go to where you DE is located?
Duksrule is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 05:28 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: 172 SIC
Posts: 30
Default

The only way I know you could log PIC before the check ride is to be alone in the aircraft. So yes, if you have a solo endorsement you can log PIC while solo just like ASEL. Good luck with insurance allowing that though.
FAPInbound is offline  
Old 04-27-2011, 08:37 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Coto Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Default

I think the reg says something appropriately rated and sole manipulator of the controls
Coto Pilot is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 07:12 AM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,059
Default

No, you can't log PIC unless you solo (good luck getting insurance).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 09:13 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 115
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
No, you can't log PIC unless you solo (good luck getting insurance).
I think some schools use the "supervised solo" where the instructor sits in the airplane and supposedly doesn't touch anything.

Stupid...but I'm pretty sure it's happening.
AbortAbortAbort is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 01:16 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Airline Captain
Posts: 540
Default

Oh it's happening. Another case of insurance companies driving federal law. To get a multi add-on to a PPL you need solo time. But since insurance companies wont cover that, a law was written that allows the "supervised solo"
Walkeraviator is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 01:52 PM
  #7  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Walkeraviator
Oh it's happening. Another case of insurance companies driving federal law. To get a multi add-on to a PPL you need solo time. But since insurance companies wont cover that, a law was written that allows the "supervised solo"
To do an added class rating to your private pilot certificate, you do NOT need any solo time...read 61.63c "need not meet the specified training time requirements prescribed by this part..."

Also, you can not log PIC in a multi engine airplane unless you have those privileges on your certificate, or you are flying solo with the proper endorsement. Read 61.31d...
mrgpilot is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 02:25 PM
  #8  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,059
Default

Originally Posted by AbortAbortAbort
I think some schools use the "supervised solo" where the instructor sits in the airplane and supposedly doesn't touch anything.

Stupid...but I'm pretty sure it's happening.
That's true, but you cannot log it as solo/PIC. It counts for certain regulatory requirements INSTEAD of actual solo, but that does not mean it IS solo.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 03:31 PM
  #9  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
That's true, but you cannot log it as solo/PIC. It counts for certain regulatory requirements INSTEAD of actual solo, but that does not mean it IS solo.
I've heard about that before but didn't know where it came from or applied. So "Supervised Solo" would be having an instructor sit there but allowing the flight time to count to a part 61 rating? For instance, a person who wants to get their PPL AMEL (as their initial PPL) would have an instructor sit in there on the XCs just not touch/say anything? That allows them to meet the reqs under part 61?

Wild...
snippercr is offline  
Old 04-28-2011, 03:53 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,733
Default

The "performing the duties of pilot in command in a multiengine (or for that matter SEL) airplane with an authorized instructor" clause is for the Commercial, not the PVT.

The game is you do the MEL as an add on, then you're rated in the class A/C so you can log the Commercial training as PIC. But no one will turn you lose in a twin these days so the schools complained to the FAA who created the "performing the duties" reg. Now it's come full circle and the flight schools complained "We don't have to turn our MEL students loose, why should we have to risk our SEL aircraft?" And so the FAA allows a commercial student to drag his security blanket along in a 172.

Last edited by Twin Wasp; 04-28-2011 at 04:04 PM.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
Airsupport
Regional
84
02-06-2010 09:38 AM
Dahlysia
Cargo
4
12-24-2009 08:28 PM
JeepDrowner
Regional
85
10-03-2009 05:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices