Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Transitioning to a Mooney 201J....... >

Transitioning to a Mooney 201J.......

Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Transitioning to a Mooney 201J.......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2006, 06:52 AM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 15
Question Transitioning to a Mooney 201J.......

I will be transitioning to a Mooney 201J almost immediately after I get my PPL. It's a family plane and has been offered for the purpose of building time. I know it has a bit of a reputaion for being "slick." I was wondering if anybody could offer some advice as to how I can prepare for the transition from a 172, to the Mooney. I have a healthy respect for this undertaking, I just want to make sure I'm prepared. Any advice you might be able to offer would be greatly appreciated!!!
phoenix is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 06:55 AM
  #2  
Big Poppa
 
LeoSV's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 613
Default

lucky dog..
LeoSV is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 07:09 AM
  #3  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 15
Default

Tell me about it!!
phoenix is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 08:02 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

Mooneys have a tendency of being landed flat. Mainly because of the fact that they sit so low to the ground that the nose is actually higher than the mains. The deck angle on the newer ones is about 7 degrees nose up.

Make sure to be dilligent planning your descents, especially if the plane has a two-blade prop.
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 08:45 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mccube5's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 722
Default

i think the fact that you are on here opening a thread admitting that you are about to venture into uncharted territory and would like some advice says you can handle the transition. the main thing with jumping from a 172 to a high performance plane is to respect the extra oomph that you will now have. like someone else said planning your descents is key too. Realistically though theres not a lot too it, just make sure you stay ahead of the plane, the faster it goes the easier it is to let it get ahead of you, like traffic pattern ops.
mccube5 is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 10:14 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 78
Default

After flying the M20J getting back into the 172 will feel liek a toy plane and much easier to handle.

Be careful with power-on stalls as the nose breaks pretty hard.

Things will feel cramped inside especially if someones next to you.

The M20J is more stable and much easier to fly in comparison. It has a heavier feel.

The wings are laminar flow which makes them more aerodynamically clean and very efficient at cruise speeds. Descent and speed reductions will take some planning in comparison to the 172.

Flaps are kind of funny too. They are used for every T/O and have no degree detents. Its basically infinately adjustable to either end of the stops.

The plane lands a litle flat too. You'll fly it right on to the ground.

Do you have yuor compllex endorsement yet? you'll need that in order to act as PIC.
NYCPilot is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 09:55 PM
  #7  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotpip
Mooneys have a tendency of being landed flat. Mainly because of the fact that they sit so low to the ground that the nose is actually higher than the mains. The deck angle on the newer ones is about 7 degrees nose up.

Make sure to be dilligent planning your descents, especially if the plane has a two-blade prop.

What does the two bladed prop have to do with it??? Are we talking about P-Factor?? If so, could you please explain your comment?? I don't understand.
phoenix is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 10:02 PM
  #8  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 15
Default

Originally Posted by NYCPilot
After flying the M20J getting back into the 172 will feel liek a toy plane and much easier to handle.

Be careful with power-on stalls as the nose breaks pretty hard.

Things will feel cramped inside especially if someones next to you.

The M20J is more stable and much easier to fly in comparison. It has a heavier feel.

The wings are laminar flow which makes them more aerodynamically clean and very efficient at cruise speeds. Descent and speed reductions will take some planning in comparison to the 172.

Flaps are kind of funny too. They are used for every T/O and have no degree detents. Its basically infinately adjustable to either end of the stops.

The plane lands a litle flat too. You'll fly it right on to the ground.

Do you have yuor compllex endorsement yet? you'll need that in order to act as PIC.
No, I don't have a complex endorsement, but I have a few Multi-Turbine non-retract hours under my belt. Good fun it was! I live for the start-ups!!!
phoenix is offline  
Old 09-07-2006, 10:07 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by phoenix
What does the two bladed prop have to do with it??? Are we talking about P-Factor?? If so, could you please explain your comment?? I don't understand.
The additional blade causes a lot more drag. There is much more frontal area when you reduce power and get a low pitch/high RPM position than there would be with just two blades. You also have the additional drag that is a byproduct of the thrust being produced (remember, a prop is just an airfoil generating lift that's being used in a different direction). I haven't flown a newer mooney with a three blade prop but the few hours I have in an M20 showed me that it's very slippery. You really, really have to be ahead of that aircraft.

While we're not talking about a mooney, I've flown a 172RG in each configuration and the 3 blades were immediately apparent when doing power off 180 landings. The 3 bladed aircraft fell out of the sky.
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 09-08-2006, 07:01 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Sitting down and facing front. Why would you want to know that?
Posts: 536
Default

The best thing that I could say, is to get as much instruction in it as it takes to really feel comfortable. Going from a private checkride to that plane will be interesting, to say the least.
WhiteH2O is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices