Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Flying DME Arc, lose DME, now what? >

Flying DME Arc, lose DME, now what?

Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Flying DME Arc, lose DME, now what?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2011, 01:38 PM
  #31  
Working weekends
 
satpak77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 2,384
Default

Originally Posted by PFactor
Required obstruction clearance (ROC) along the arc
depends on the approach segment. For an initial
approach segment, a ROC of 1,000 feet is required in
the primary area, which extends to 4 NM on either side
of the arc. For an intermediate segment primary area
the ROC is 500 feet. The initial and intermediate segment
secondary areas extend 2 NM from the primary
boundary area edge. The ROC starts at the primary
area boundary edge at 500 feet and tapers to zero feet at
the secondary area outer edge.

The total width of an arc intermediate
segment is 6 NM on each side of the arc. For obstacle
clearance purposes, this width is divided into a primary
and a secondary area. The primary area extends 4 NM
laterally on each side of the arc segment. The secondary
areas extend 2 NM laterally on each side of the primary area.

So let's say you're flying the arc at 150kts...2.5 miles/min. I'd say "dead reckoning" for a few moments to begin the climb and reconfigure is your best bet. Just figured it would be good to see the obstacle clearance figures. Although, I can't say what the obstacle clearance limits are in other parts of the world. Don't forget to check the approach chart for your highest obstacles in the area either!
Great info. I must admit that the original question is indeed one that made my mental gears turn. Sadly (my fault?) those gears are cobwebbed up and it takes these kinds of discussions to clear them up.

Realizing that may make no sense to the normal reader, what I mean is that these types of discussions are good to stimulate thought.
satpak77 is offline  
Old 01-14-2011, 12:07 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver
The only problem I have with Noy's (sensible) solution is that a situation as common or possible as this one would seem to merit a specific procedure of some kind. Since aircraft performance would be known factor in this scenario, it seems like a company ops manual would address it. So at an interview I would give that as my primary response, and if the interviewer replies there is no company solution, THEN I would ask if we could get back to MSA and how fast we could get there.
Absolutely. Sometimes the best answer is a question that clarifies. Not all questions give all the information necessary to answer it.
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 03-05-2011, 08:24 AM
  #33  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 2
Default Lost DME on an Arc

Anyone have a textbook answer for what to do if you lose DME on an arc? e.g. how would one execute "the missed" on an arc?
rfaduka3 is offline  
Old 03-05-2011, 09:16 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
f16jetmech's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: CFI
Posts: 413
Default

Assuming not in radar contact or on with atc, I would say climbing to msa, proceeding direct to the VOR and holding as published. Normally holds on arcs are over the VOR. Personally though, turn ten and twist ten and you will be fine. I'd keep shooting the arc in a real world situation. Not the textbook answer though
f16jetmech is offline  
Old 03-05-2011, 10:35 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: A-320 FO
Posts: 693
Default

We seem to use dme on the arc about once a week around here. The GNS530W now becomes your dme, continue with the approach.
clipperskipper is offline  
Old 03-05-2011, 12:33 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
forumname's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: I am the Stig
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by f16jetmech
Assuming not in radar contact or on with atc, I would say climbing to msa, proceeding direct to the VOR and holding as published. Normally holds on arcs are over the VOR. Personally though, turn ten and twist ten and you will be fine. I'd keep shooting the arc in a real world situation. Not the textbook answer though
Assuming you are not on arc for very long and/or there isn't a strong crosswind.

Originally Posted by clipperskipper
We seem to use dme on the arc about once a week around here. The GNS530W now becomes your dme, continue with the approach.
Works great, probably better than the turn 10 twist 10, especially if you can couple the LNAV/VNAV and have it loaded properly.

Unless you're company doesn't have it approved in their ops specs to shoot a DME ARC or your getting line check, etc.

Sure would suck to be in the hearing if you used your GPS to fly the approach AND something else went wrong, now you're trying to explain the CP/Feds why you did what you did.
forumname is offline  
Old 03-05-2011, 03:03 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: A-320 FO
Posts: 693
Default

Originally Posted by forumname
Assuming you are not on arc for very long and/or there isn't a strong crosswind.



Works great, probably better than the turn 10 twist 10, especially if you can couple the LNAV/VNAV and have it loaded properly.

Unless you're company doesn't have it approved in their ops specs to shoot a DME ARC or your getting line check, etc.

Sure would suck to be in the hearing if you used your GPS to fly the approach AND something else went wrong, now you're trying to explain the CP/Feds why you did what you did.
The Garmin 530W can be used freely as a DME substitute and as a substitute for ADF on ADF-required approaches. DME substitution also applies to precision approaches. RTM.
clipperskipper is offline  
Old 03-05-2011, 03:59 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
forumname's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: I am the Stig
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by clipperskipper
The Garmin 530W can be used freely as a DME substitute and as a substitute for ADF on ADF-required approaches. DME substitution also applies to precision approaches. RTM.
With all due respect, I'm not sure you fully read the back half of my post.

For clarification purposes, does "RTM" stand for Read the manual?

In the part 91 world, that my acceptable. But if your operating at an air carrier, the Op Specs may not allow you use/substitute GPS data in the even of a conventional nav DEM failure. In which case, I'd say "RTOS"

Also, I'm not sure how using the GPS for distance info on ADF approaches applies to the topic at had. You know, what to do if you have a DME failure on a DME arc.
forumname is offline  
Old 03-06-2011, 06:03 PM
  #39  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by forumname
With all due respect, I'm not sure you fully read the back half of my post.

For clarification purposes, does "RTM" stand for Read the manual?

In the part 91 world, that my acceptable. But if your operating at an air carrier, the Op Specs may not allow you use/substitute GPS data in the even of a conventional nav DEM failure. In which case, I'd say "RTOS"

Also, I'm not sure how using the GPS for distance info on ADF approaches applies to the topic at had. You know, what to do if you have a DME failure on a DME arc.
If I have GPS, regardless of ops specs, I'm going to fly the arc utilizing whatever guidance I can, as I climb to the missed approach altitude and contact ATC.

Don't over think it and feel free to exercise command authority, but ALWAYS err towards the safer course of action. Nobody will question you if you take the safer path.

Even in a light GA aircraft, you should be able to climb from whatever circling altitude is assigned to the arc to the MSA or Missed Approach Altitude before you leave the confines of the protected arc just by taking a WAG at it.
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 03-07-2011, 08:05 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
forumname's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: I am the Stig
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
If I have GPS, regardless of ops specs, I'm going to fly the arc utilizing whatever guidance I can, as I climb to the missed approach altitude and contact ATC.

Don't over think it and feel free to exercise command authority, but ALWAYS err towards the safer course of action. Nobody will question you if you take the safer path.

Even in a light GA aircraft, you should be able to climb from whatever circling altitude is assigned to the arc to the MSA or Missed Approach Altitude before you leave the confines of the protected arc just by taking a WAG at it.
I NEVER said I wouldn't use it if I had a failure and it the sole means of distance information.

I was simply responding to the poster that said he'd use it on the approach.

With all due respect, you didn't fully read the post either.
forumname is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ryane946
Cargo
34
04-03-2016 07:39 PM
MoneyMan
Cargo
9
02-24-2008 04:47 PM
aircraftdriver
Major
1
09-21-2007 08:19 AM
Slaphappy
Regional
0
08-22-2006 11:08 AM
Gordon C
Major
12
08-07-2006 08:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices