Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Logging Time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2010, 02:00 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: C-172 PPL
Posts: 176
Question Logging Time

When I started flying, I entered time in my log book according to the HOBBS meter.

I've recently gotten a GPS logger, which shows my time in the air much more accurately, and I'm realizing that HOBBS time is about 30% greater than actual time in the air. (for local flights and short cross country flights).

Does anyone have advice on how best to log time? HOBBS, as it tends to account for taxi and run-up time (which is still PIC-time), or GPS-supported time-in-the-air?
abelenky is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 02:15 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PropDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: In charge of the remote
Posts: 207
Default

If I'm paying for the plane based on the hobbs time, I'm logging based on the hobbs time
PropDriver is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 02:34 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by abelenky
When I started flying, I entered time in my log book according to the HOBBS meter.

I've recently gotten a GPS logger, which shows my time in the air much more accurately, and I'm realizing that HOBBS time is about 30% greater than actual time in the air. (for local flights and short cross country flights).

Does anyone have advice on how best to log time? HOBBS, as it tends to account for taxi and run-up time (which is still PIC-time), or GPS-supported time-in-the-air?
Yeah dude... most everything in the civilian world is in hobbs time. Don't sweat it.
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 03:08 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 762
Default

Originally Posted by abelenky
When I started flying, I entered time in my log book according to the HOBBS meter.

I've recently gotten a GPS logger, which shows my time in the air much more accurately, and I'm realizing that HOBBS time is about 30% greater than actual time in the air. (for local flights and short cross country flights).

Does anyone have advice on how best to log time? HOBBS, as it tends to account for taxi and run-up time (which is still PIC-time), or GPS-supported time-in-the-air?
14CFR1.1 General Definitions:
Flight time means:

(1) Pilot time that commences when an aircraft moves under its own power for the purpose of flight and ends when the aircraft comes to rest after landing;
You don't actually have to be in the air for it to be considered flight time, just have to taxi with the intent of flying.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 04:19 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by abelenky
Does anyone have advice on how best to log time? HOBBS, as it tends to account for taxi and run-up time (which is still PIC-time), or GPS-supported time-in-the-air?
I think, combined with NE-Pilot pointing out the FAA definition of flight time, you've answered your question.

Or maybe not. Let's see, the minimum requirements for a VFR Part 135 PIC is 500 hours. The real requirements for a real job may be more, but let's stick with the 500 hours.

You figured about a 30% difference. The difference will be smaller the longer the flight but let's go with your 30%. So, using your handy dandy GPS takeoff to touchdown flight time, you'll need to pay for 150 more hours of flight time to meet the minimums.

Your dime. What's your answer to your question?
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 04:50 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

I wish the military operated under the same premise
Since a majority of my flights were rather short - that 30% would have made quite the difference!
In my current job they even use the GPS landing/takeoff times to pay me - and the GPS doesn't even begin to register time until 30 kts I think it is

USMCFLYR

Last edited by USMCFLYR; 09-23-2010 at 05:09 AM.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 04:56 AM
  #7  
Eats shoots and leaves...
 
bcrosier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Posts: 849
Default

You just need to taxi faster!
bcrosier is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 04:57 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,341
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
- and the GPS doesn't even begin to register time until 30 kts I think it is

USMCFLYR
Just taxi faster.

I don't understand why they would operate like that. Controlling an aircraft on the ground requires just as much work as controlling it in the air.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 05:08 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by bcrosier
You just need to taxi faster!
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Just taxi faster.

I don't understand why they would operate like that. Controlling an aircraft on the ground requires just as much work as controlling it in the air.
If they weren't such stinkers on the brakes for this aircraft I would

2StgTurbine - basically because they operate like the military - takeoff to landing, except don't add the extra 5 minutes that the military allows (which I never did anyways). I guess when you have to pay money for every 6 minutes then every minute counts.

To be fair - the company wouldn't question if you used times when you took the runway and pulled off the runway, but most pilots seem to just read off the GPS and use the takoff time and the total flighttime counter to log. I'm more making fun of the situation than really trying to make an issue out of it.


USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 05:51 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,341
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
If they weren't such stinkers on the brakes for this aircraft I would

2StgTurbine - basically because they operate like the military - takeoff to landing, except don't add the extra 5 minutes that the military allows (which I never did anyways). I guess when you have to pay money for every 6 minutes then every minute counts.

To be fair - the company wouldn't question if you used times when you took the runway and pulled off the runway, but most pilots seem to just read off the GPS and use the takoff time and the total flighttime counter to log. I'm more making fun of the situation than really trying to make an issue out of it.


USMCFLYR
I just really hate it when operators don't pay their pilots when they are working as pilots (even on the ground). I am sure you are still fairly compensated, but I just spoke with a jump pilot who got paid by the tach time and I am still a little infuriated by it.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wmuflyboy
Flight Schools and Training
30
03-26-2023 06:18 PM
MrBigAir
Aviation Law
21
11-06-2008 08:00 AM
WhiteH2O
Flight Schools and Training
10
10-31-2006 03:02 PM
TravisUK
Flight Schools and Training
20
08-26-2006 08:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices