Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Operating on an IFR flight plan in Class G Ai >

Operating on an IFR flight plan in Class G Ai

Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Operating on an IFR flight plan in Class G Ai

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2010, 07:21 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt
That's not correct. What you quoted from 91.155 were minimums when operating under visual flight rules. There is nothing preventing one from operating under instrument flight rules in Class G without a flight plan.

Look at 91.173 (you can also look at that NTSB case I linked to) - you are only required to have a flight plan on file when operating under instrument flight rules in controlled airspace. No controlled airspace, no flight plan required, even under IFR.

The existence of non-existence of a flight plan does not make the difference between IFR and VFR.
Sorry, grabbed the wrong catch-all reg.


Sec. 91.177 - Minimum altitudes for IFR operations.
(a) Operation of aircraft at minimum altitudes. Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft under IFR below --
(1) The applicable minimum altitudes prescribed in parts 95 and 97 of this chapter; or
(2) If no applicable minimum altitude is prescribed in those parts --
(i) In the case of operations over an area designated as a mountainous area in part 95, an altitude of 2,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of 4 nautical miles from the course to be flown; or
(ii) In any other case, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of 4 nautical miles from the course to be flown.
However, if both a MEA and a MOCA are prescribed for a particular route or route segment, a person may operate an aircraft below the MEA down to, but not below, the MOCA, when within 22 nautical miles of the VOR concerned (based on the pilot's reasonable estimate of that distance). (b) Climb. Climb to a higher minimum IFR altitude shall begin immediately after passing the point beyond which that minimum altitude applies, except that when ground obstructions intervene, the point beyond which that higher minimum altitude applies shall be crossed at or above the applicable MCA.
woodfinx is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 11:07 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by woodfinx
Sorry, grabbed the wrong catch-all reg.
Absolutely. And that restriction (which applies to all IFR flight) is going to severely limit the areas where you can fly IFR en route in Class G, which is why I think the discussion is mostly academic.

But the places do exist. In the Rockies, there are still areas where Class G goes to 14,500 (and higher) and the mountains only to 10K. In some sparser sections of the midwest, I don't think you'll find too many 14,500 areas but there are some "zippers" where Class G gets pretty high relative to the terrain and some pretty empty flat spots in parts of the midwest where you can get that required 1000 over the highest terrain.
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 11:09 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by Photon
again NoyGonnaDoIt, you provide sound argument and some nice case material here !
Thanks
Thank you. That's very kind.
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 12:52 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by NoyGonnaDoIt
Absolutely. And that restriction (which applies to all IFR flight) is going to severely limit the areas where you can fly IFR en route in Class G, which is why I think the discussion is mostly academic.

But the places do exist. In the Rockies, there are still areas where Class G goes to 14,500 (and higher) and the mountains only to 10K. In some sparser sections of the midwest, I don't think you'll find too many 14,500 areas but there are some "zippers" where Class G gets pretty high relative to the terrain and some pretty empty flat spots in parts of the midwest where you can get that required 1000 over the highest terrain.
Yeah the problem with that is (at least of what I could find) is that all the minimum IFR altitudes in that part of the country are in class E airspace. I imagine that over all of the continential U.S. it is only an academic theory and not actually able to be performed.
woodfinx is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 01:42 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 42
Default

Originally Posted by woodfinx
Yeah the problem with that is (at least of what I could find) is that all the minimum IFR altitudes in that part of the country are in class E airspace. I imagine that over all of the continential U.S. it is only an academic theory and not actually able to be performed.
Try central Nevada, although there is no real reason to go out there, it's very possible.
clearedirect is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 05:20 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by woodfinx
Yeah the problem with that is (at least of what I could find) is that all the minimum IFR altitudes in that part of the country are in class E airspace. I imagine that over all of the continential U.S. it is only an academic theory and not actually able to be performed.
Take a look at this piece of airspace:

SkyVector.com - Aeronautical Charts - Flight Planning

Class G goes to 14,500. At 12,500 you are 2000' above the nearest obstruction for much more than 4 NM and still 2000' below Class E.
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 06:26 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 206
Default

True.

So it could be done, but I noticed a funny thing when you look at all the non standard class E floors on the Low Enroute. For most of the areas (with the exception of 1 or 2 airports) you would have to file IFR to get to one of the non-standard areas, cancel, fly around IFR in class G, and then reopen an IFR flight plan to get to one of the areas from an airport.
woodfinx is offline  
Old 03-08-2010, 10:24 PM
  #28  
Blue Skies
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: C208B
Posts: 778
Default

how about Alaska?
Photon is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
FR8Hauler
Cargo
80
08-22-2009 07:16 PM
sstra21759
Military
4
06-20-2009 06:39 PM
vagabond
Hiring News
4
04-08-2009 08:03 AM
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
23
02-28-2009 08:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices