Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

bank angle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2009, 11:27 AM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 8
Default bank angle

I was wondering is it safe to roll into a 60 or 70 degree bank in a cessna 152 or 172? As long as your slower than Va then you shouldnt have any worries of overstressing due to the fact that the wing will stall before it overstresses, correct? I also understand that stalling speed increases with bank angle so you wouldnt want to be too slow when in a very steep bank. So would it be ok to bank this steep? If so, at what airspeed? Va in the 172 I fly is 95kts.
kbennett is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 12:21 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fatmike69's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: EMB120 CA
Posts: 299
Default

Originally Posted by kbennett
I was wondering is it safe to roll into a 60 or 70 degree bank in a cessna 152 or 172? As long as your slower than Va then you shouldnt have any worries of overstressing due to the fact that the wing will stall before it overstresses, correct? I also understand that stalling speed increases with bank angle so you wouldnt want to be too slow when in a very steep bank. So would it be ok to bank this steep? If so, at what airspeed? Va in the 172 I fly is 95kts.
In theory, yes. Not quite sure if your Cessna would sustain flight at 70 degrees bank angle though at maneuvering speed, stall speed is almost doubled at 70 degrees bank. And if you are uncoordinated in the turn, the resulting stall could be interesting, might end up on its back. Also don't forget that the FAA legally would consider this acrobatic flight, at which point you'd need parachutes.
fatmike69 is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 12:28 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
propjunkie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: E-170
Posts: 173
Default

Originally Posted by fatmike69
In theory, yes. Not quite sure if your Cessna would sustain flight at 70 degrees bank angle though at maneuvering speed, stall speed is almost doubled at 70 degrees bank. And if you are uncoordinated in the turn, the resulting stall could be interesting, might end up on its back. Also don't forget that the FAA legally would consider this acrobatic flight, at which point you'd need parachutes.
Don't need a parachute if u have CFI with ya. Then its fair game!
propjunkie is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 12:29 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly Boy Knight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: PT Inbound
Posts: 219
Default

If you are below Va, you do not have the aerodynamic capability to (+ G) over-
stress the airplane. This means, no control input and/or wind gust or what have you will be able to over stress the airplane because the wing will accelerate stall before it generates enough lift to damage it.

That said, a 60 -70 bank is fine however, if you intend to maintain altitude, you may be in a position where if you pulled back enough to maintain alt, you could accelerate stall thus NOT maintaining altitude. It's not the bank that stalls the airplane, it's the require back pressure to maintain level that stalls the airplane

ie. 70 degrees + no back pressure still = 1 G (descending ofcourse) but no accelerate stall
Fly Boy Knight is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 12:39 PM
  #5  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Returning to base after skydiving hops in a C182, we descend at 150 kts and up to 110 degrees bank. You'll get about 3.5 g's doing this as well as a very nice descent rate. It's perfectly safe as long as the air is fairly smooth. We wear parachutes as a precaution. It is standard practice, done year after year.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 12:40 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DSflyer05's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Gulfstream 4SP & 5
Posts: 116
Default

even if your below Va, you still neet to be aware of the "air quailty." If it is a turbulent, gusty day and your in a bank that steep, with the increased stall speed, you could get into an accelerated stall if you hita good spot of turblance. There should also be a chart in the POH that tells you the stall speed for a given bank angle.
DSflyer05 is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 12:42 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bernouli's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 596
Default

Originally Posted by kbennett
I was wondering is it safe to roll into a 60 or 70 degree bank in a cessna 152 or 172? As long as your slower than Va then you shouldnt have any worries of overstressing due to the fact that the wing will stall before it overstresses, correct? I also understand that stalling speed increases with bank angle so you wouldnt want to be too slow when in a very steep bank. So would it be ok to bank this steep? If so, at what airspeed? Va in the 172 I fly is 95kts.
theres only one way to find out.......
bernouli is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 01:01 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryan1234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: USAF
Posts: 1,398
Default

Originally Posted by Fly Boy Knight
If you are below Va, you do not have the aerodynamic capability to (+ G) over-
stress the airplane.
Never say never.

to the OP you can go 90 degrees of bank no problem in a 172.... doing a wing over (kinda like what some CFIs pass off as "spin training")
ryan1234 is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 01:21 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 348
Default

Originally Posted by kbennett
I was wondering is it safe to roll into a 60 or 70 degree bank in a cessna 152 or 172? As long as your slower than Va then you shouldnt have any worries of overstressing due to the fact that the wing will stall before it overstresses, correct? I also understand that stalling speed increases with bank angle so you wouldnt want to be too slow when in a very steep bank. So would it be ok to bank this steep? If so, at what airspeed? Va in the 172 I fly is 95kts.
Bank angle is not the problem in regards to Va, load factor is. Basically all you are asking is if a 70 degree *level* turn would exceed the G limit of your aircraft. Take a look at a chart comparing G forces to bank angle in a level turn, and you'll see that a 70 degree banked level turn equates to about 3 Gs. So, regardless of speed, a 70 degree level turn will equate to about 3 Gs. Does 3 Gs exceed the limit of a 172? Even in the normal category, you are ok up to 3.8 Gs.

I'm not saying to go out and do 70 degree level turns to your hearts content. I'm just saying that you can, without overstressing the aircraft, bank beyond 70,90, 120, whatever, as long as you don't exceed the load factor limit, regardless of airspeed. Va just makes it so that you will stall the wing before exceeding the G limit.
plasticpi is offline  
Old 12-04-2009, 01:45 PM
  #10  
Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,971
Default

Originally Posted by bernouli
theres only one way to find out.......
I apologize for this ignorant post....

You have to say "hey watch this" first. Only then will it all work out.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flaps50
Cargo
16
01-02-2010 05:55 AM
AZFlyer
Hangar Talk
18
08-23-2009 08:27 PM
CAVU
Cargo
9
04-21-2009 05:41 AM
jungle
Money Talk
1
03-24-2009 08:46 PM
Sea Pig
Cargo
4
08-26-2008 04:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices