Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Noob question: Turboprops = turbine time? >

Noob question: Turboprops = turbine time?

Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Noob question: Turboprops = turbine time?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2009, 08:08 PM
  #21  
Blue Skies
 
Photon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: C208B
Posts: 778
Default

Originally Posted by HectorD
DA42 considered turbine?
I think he was referring to the fact that the DA42 burns jet fuel, but is in fact a diesel engine, not a turbine
Photon is offline  
Old 05-31-2009, 08:57 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,733
Default

Before someone runs off and starts logging DA-42 as turbo-prop time ("But I saw somewhere on the internet I could do it"), I bow to SunDog's superior wit and retract my earlier statement.

The FAA has a list in AC61-89 which planes are centerline thrust. It gets down to the point the T-37 is, the A-37 isn't.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 05-31-2009, 11:47 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by snippercr
Really? Wow, never knew that. Out of curiosity... how does that work? I mean physically looking at the aircraft, there are clearly two engines on either side of the longitudinal axis so there would be SOME yawing moment if one engine died. Obviously due to the closeness of the engines, it would be small. Is that the only reason why?
Yes - the Hornet will yaw some with one engine out. It flies very well on one engine though - if flown correctly!

I wonder if the AC has been updated recently. They specifically mention the F/A-18A as having the CLT limitation, but not other models. I know that they said that the F-14's engine were far enough apart, but I wonder what the reason for the A-37 is for not having the restriction other than lbs thrust; but then other aircraft certainly have have powerful engines it would seem with more arm between them (A-10?)

USMCFLYR

Last edited by USMCFLYR; 06-03-2009 at 04:51 PM.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 06:44 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,733
Default

It hasn't been updated for several years. That's what I've heard, that the higher thrust engines on the Dragonfly make it a "normal" twin while the T-37 has the CLT limitation. The suprising one to me is the A-10, just looking at it I'd think it was "normal."
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 06-03-2009, 10:10 AM
  #25  
On Reserve
 
almadadavid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp
It hasn't been updated for several years. That's what I've heard, that the higher thrust engines on the Dragonfly make it a "normal" twin while the T-37 has the CLT limitation. The suprising one to me is the A-10, just looking at it I'd think it was "normal."
I hope my comment helps this part of the post, and then again take it as I quote the senior cadet refering once that the "T37 was uncapable of climbing on one engine"; no idea what were the loads or weather conditions he was at or whether he was just being general period.
This is what he said back 10 yrs ago when I was in the airforce (FAC colombian air force) mmmm wish I had graduated instead of quitting ... anyways my 2 cents
DADA
almadadavid is offline  
Old 06-17-2009, 03:55 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
whatthe6789's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: CFI in training
Posts: 160
Default

Originally Posted by HectorD
I am guessing the same for the T-38?
But then, wouldn't something like a citation or even 727 be considered centerline thrust? the rudder is between the engines but there really isn't anything to produce adverse controls since there is no fuselage behind the engines no?

I am have just started ME training so this is really interesting.
Have you flown a 727 with an engine out? There is still adverse yaw... (Before anyone asks, unfortunately, my 727 time is sim... )

Edit: Obviously except when it's the #2 engine...
whatthe6789 is offline  
Old 06-17-2009, 04:55 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
HectorD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: PA-44 Left Seat :P
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by whatthe6789
Have you flown a 727 with an engine out? There is still adverse yaw... (Before anyone asks, unfortunately, my 727 time is sim... )

Edit: Obviously except when it's the #2 engine...
I haven't even flown a turboprop yet.
HectorD is offline  
Old 06-17-2009, 07:35 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 806
Post

If Vmc is below stall speed at all weights, then it is centerline thrust. If at any weight, Vmc exceeds stall speed, then it is not centerline thrust. The A-37 has significantly higher thrust than the T-37, therefore at low weights Vmc might be higher than stall speed.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 07:16 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,733
Default

Originally Posted by whatthe6789
Have you flown a 727 with an engine out? There is still adverse yaw... (Before anyone asks, unfortunately, my 727 time is sim... )

Edit: Obviously except when it's the #2 engine...
I wouldn't call it "adverse yaw" since the yawing moment is not caused by the generation of lift. Was doing a two engine ferry off BOS a few years ago. You have to note it in the remarks and tell the tower before departure. We get handed off to BOS Departure and they say they understand we have an engine shutdown and want to know which one so they'll know which way to turn us. I look over at the F/O, shrug my shoulders, smile and reply, "It's number 2."

A pod would just take a couple of units of trim, not too much.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 06-18-2009, 09:56 AM
  #30  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp
I wouldn't call it "adverse yaw" since the yawing moment is not caused by the generation of lift. Was doing a two engine ferry off BOS a few years ago. You have to note it in the remarks and tell the tower before departure. We get handed off to BOS Departure and they say they understand we have an engine shutdown and want to know which one so they'll know which way to turn us. I look over at the F/O, shrug my shoulders, smile and reply, "It's number 2."

A pod would just take a couple of units of trim, not too much.
That's a good one to have shut down for sure!!! Wonder if the controller turned a little red after that, or did they even know.
Ewfflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRMcaptain
Flight Schools and Training
48
10-01-2014 06:38 PM
atpwannabe
Aviation Law
22
09-11-2009 06:29 PM
Bowersbum
Flight Schools and Training
34
12-01-2008 04:03 PM
mcartier713
Part 135
14
09-30-2008 04:17 PM
rocketman3746
Major
21
08-25-2008 06:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices