Flight Training Device
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
And if you mean the CFI side of "training received", then the simplest explanation might be, "Here's the reg, Mr. Fed"?
==============================
61.51(h) Logging training time.
(1) A person may log training time when that person receives training from an authorized instructor in an aircraft, flight simulator, or flight training device.
==============================
Of course, a lot depends on your definition of the word "dual" and how you choose to use it in your logbook. (The FAR does not define "dual.")
If you use "dual" to mean "flight training" then you are correct. Training time in an FTD is not "flight" training. But if you are using "dual" to simply mean "training received in an aircraft, flight simulator, or flight training device" what's wrong with logging it that way?
Bookkeeping
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 135 FO
Posts: 148
That's how I was taught, and that's how I teach my students to log training given in FTD (if it's counting towards a certificate or rating, or being used for currency). The only thing you have to remember to do is subtract the FTD time from the Dual when you're filling out the 8710 [the FTD Dual is recorded seperately on the 8710].
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
In the course of the opinion, the Chief Counsel, somewhat irrelevantly says,
There is no provision in the FAR's for logging of "dual" flight time; however, we assume that you are referring to logging time as instruction received.
So, we get people all the time who say that there's no such thing as "dual." Problem is that the FAA (while never really defining it) does use it. The SFAR in Part 61 about training requirements for Robinson helicopters uses "dual" extensively. And as recently as 2006, even the FAA Chief Counsel used it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MobiusOne
Flight Schools and Training
6
09-24-2008 04:17 AM