Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Flight Schools and Training
Building hours VS. piling up hours >

Building hours VS. piling up hours

Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

Building hours VS. piling up hours

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2008, 01:01 PM
  #11  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

As far as pilots, male or female, I would pander that larger corporations will be more willing to put a female ahead of the male to keep the "status quo." Smaller operations will stick to the "can you hack it or not" way of doing things, which at a small 135 is where I flew with one of the better pilots I've had the opportunity to fly with that was female.
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 07-06-2008, 08:12 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Sperl0863's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 38
Default

I would think that Frasca time would have to be logged as dual received. During your instrument and commercial training, a number of hours can be logged towards your rating or license (dont know the number of hours off hand). After your training, the only time you should ever log dual is for a cheap IPC. No need to if you just want to brush up on approaches and BAI.
Sperl0863 is offline  
Old 07-07-2008, 01:16 AM
  #13  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Default

Ok.. so.. I've read, re-read, and read again the FAR, including the definitions in 61.1 , viewed multiple forums and I'm still very confused. Please.. someone make sense of the following for me, it's from another forum:

"Something most guys don't know is that your Frasca ground trainer instruction time is loggable under part 61 for 50 hours of the 250 hours total required for the commercial license. So you could do another 30, in addition to the 20 for the IFR, and still have it count towards your commercial. "


FAR 61.65 (d)(2)(i) says
-at least 15 hours of flight training from an authorized instructor in the aircraft category for which the instrument rating is sought

that to me sounds like the training would have to be in a plane which would make Frasca time worthless. Though it doesn't say "must be in an airplane" like some other parts do. But then FAR 61.65 (e) spells out training with a FTD which would count Frasca time towards the 15 training hours for an instrument rating.


then there's more under FAR 61.129 for the commercial

61.129 (a)(2)(i)and(ii) says out of the 250 hours:
100 hours in powered aircraft, of which 50 must be in airplanes.
100 hours of pilot-in-command flight time which includes at least 50 hours in cross country flight time of which at least 10 hours must be in airplanes.


That leaves 50 up for grab.


Also 61.129 (a)(3)(i) says
-10 hours of instrument training of which at least 5 hours must be in a single-engine airplane.


which again to me means ftd time does count.

All of that says to me Frasca time is not worthless because though they cant be included in Total time they can be credited in lieu of the required flight time towards meeting the total aeronautical experience or recency of experience requirements.


I am aware of the fact that there has been other threads about time logging. I've read some of the posts but they are from a while back. Do you guys have a different understanding of this mess?
kittyhawk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Airwaves
Regional
43
05-10-2008 07:50 PM
Juicegoose
Flight Schools and Training
4
12-27-2007 07:06 AM
skypine27
Cargo
9
12-25-2007 08:27 AM
Pecan
Cargo
54
12-11-2007 03:34 PM
Engineer Pilot
Flight Schools and Training
18
07-11-2007 09:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices