Search

Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

multiengine time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2008, 03:51 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 335
Default multiengine time

Are the regionals accepting safety pilot time on a multiengine aircraft as flight time?
Or just the time on instruction or solo to get multi time experience?
Ready to bulid time and I just want to know.
Thank you
papacharlie is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 04:03 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cfii2007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,213
Default

I know AE and SkyWest will not count safety pilot time......most others don'e care.
cfii2007 is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 04:17 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
N0315's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: CFII
Posts: 184
Default

Does anyone know what competitive ME times are going right now for some regionals and some 135's? Deciding if I need to build some time or send out some apps here soon.
N0315 is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 05:00 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
skystruck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Jr. Gear Monkey
Posts: 57
Default

You might want to check into the safety pilot issue more closely. I know at least one pilot who was hired by SkyWest without an MEI and plenty of safety pilot Multi time. He explained to me that you just need to properly log it. Any safety pilot time should actually be logged as SIC (even on a single pilot type certified aircraft) because the FAR's allow a pilot to log SIC when the "type of operation" requires a second pilot. When the PIC is under the hood, a second "safety" pilot is required and therefore should be logged as SIC. The FAA actually published an article on their website regarding the logging of flight time. This subject is discussed in that article.
skystruck is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 11:29 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

Do you have a link to that?
de727ups is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 01:27 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cfii2007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,213
Default

I thought the aircraft had to be certified for a two person crew to necessitate logging PIC and SIC?
cfii2007 is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 02:28 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KiloAlpha's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: AA A320
Posts: 1,624
Default

Originally Posted by skystruck
Any safety pilot time should actually be logged as SIC (even on a single pilot type certified aircraft) because the FAR's allow a pilot to log SIC when the "type of operation" requires a second pilot.
----------
FAR 61.51 Pilot Logbooks

(f) Logging second-in-command flight time. A person may log second-in-command time only for that flight time during which that person:

(1) Is qualified in accordance with the second-in-command requirements of §61.55 of this part, and occupies a crewmember station in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate; or

(2) Holds the appropriate category, class, and instrument rating (if an instrument rating is required for the flight) for the aircraft being flown, and more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted.
----------


So you have to ask yourself. Am I flying in an aircraft requiring 2 crewmembers; or am I flying under part 91(k) or 135 in a single pilot aircraft that is required to have a SIC according to the company's FAA approved Ops Specs... if not, then you should not be logging SIC time. Safety pilot time is not logged as SIC.

Last edited by KiloAlpha; 01-30-2008 at 02:36 PM.
KiloAlpha is offline  
Old 01-30-2008, 06:36 PM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
skystruck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Jr. Gear Monkey
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
----------
FAR 61.51 Pilot Logbooks

(f) Logging second-in-command flight time. A person may log second-in-command time only for that flight time during which that person:

(1) Is qualified in accordance with the second-in-command requirements of §61.55 of this part, and occupies a crewmember station in an aircraft that requires more than one pilot by the aircraft's type certificate; or

(2) Holds the appropriate category, class, and instrument rating (if an instrument rating is required for the flight) for the aircraft being flown, and more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted.
----------
The regulations require two appropriately qualified pilots when one pilot is using a view limiting device under simulated insturment conditions. SIC is appropriate for the safety pilot.

The FAA has an article on their website that explains this concept. That is where I learned it. The link to the article is below:

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...AND%20TIME.pdf
skystruck is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 10:27 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

Here is a quote from your link that shows how safety pilot can be logged as PIC:

"Normally, a safety pilot, required by regulations, who scans for traffic for a pilot flying under simulated instrument conditions is not pilot-in-command and thus logs second-in-command. However, if the two pilots agree that the safety pilot is designated pilot-in-command, the safety pilot/pilot-in-command may log PIC since he is the pilot responsible for the operation and safety of the aircraft"
de727ups is offline  
Old 01-31-2008, 02:29 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
skystruck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Jr. Gear Monkey
Posts: 57
Default

Yep, I agree. A safety pilot (aboard a single pilot type certified aircraft) can log either PIC or SIC. However, if logging PIC, it's probably a good idea to put in the remarks for the flight that you were the designated PIC. The way I read the article, either SIC or PIC is appropriate for the safety pilot. Just be ready to explain it in an interview from the standpoint of 61.51.
skystruck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
cfii2007
Flight Schools and Training
5
12-04-2007 02:13 PM
samiboy05
Regional
82
12-01-2007 07:37 PM
atpwannabe
Flight Schools and Training
46
11-25-2007 06:04 PM
Tech Maven
Hangar Talk
0
01-24-2006 06:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices