767 cgn
09-12-2016, 05:16 PM
#3
Line Holder
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Posts: 94
09-13-2016, 04:14 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Hate to pour cold water on this, but there really doesn't seem to be much incentive to change the CGN base equipment. The company can get all the benefit at a fraction of the cost by just flying 767s from MEM and IND and SIBA what they can't cover beyond that. Dual qualified US 767 crews can fly 757s intra-Europe as necessary and then fly a 767 back home. Paying CGN crews WB pay to continue to operate a large percentage of 757s in theater plus sit reserve isn't going to happen, IMO. Shoot, if the 767/SIBA option of getting crews in theater works, there may not need to be a CGN base. Same model (minus the SIBA) worked in ANC for intra-Asia flying for years. One long flight to Asia, fly shorter flights for 7-10 days and fly back to domicile.
09-13-2016, 04:32 AM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: On the corner, covered in Stickum
Posts: 376
Hate to pour cold water on this, but there really doesn't seem to be much incentive to change the CGN base equipment. The company can get all the benefit at a fraction of the cost by just flying 767s from MEM and IND and SIBA what they can't cover beyond that. Dual qualified US 767 crews can fly 757s intra-Europe as necessary and then fly a 767 back home. Paying CGN crews WB pay to continue to operate a large percentage of 757s in theater plus sit reserve isn't going to happen, IMO. Shoot, if the 767/SIBA option of getting crews in theater works, there may not need to be a CGN base. Same model (minus the SIBA) worked in ANC for intra-Asia flying for years. One long flight to Asia, fly shorter flights for 7-10 days and fly back to domicile.
09-13-2016, 05:12 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Hmmm....I've been told the 767 and 757 bidpacks were going to split. Aircraft are now too dissimilar at FDX. It would be bit difficult to make your model work in that case. In addition, CGN-based crews are on domestic rules. You can work them like dogs. Also, if the ANC model was such a great idea, why did a some of their inter-Asia block hours go to HK crews when they switched to the 767?
I think the Asia block hour exchange is more a result of the 777 effects on the ANC flying rather than some deficiency in the original model. I've also heard that PEN is maxing out the 767 and could really use an MD back on their ramp. There are a few places in our system that are starting to shine a light on the reality that a 767 isn't a simple equipment swap for an MD. Time will tell.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
