Chainsaw

Amazing concise and accurate post. Nicely done!!!!

Chainsaw

Rock, enough. If you want to make love to TonyC via the internet just private message him and get it over with. Otherwise, maybe comment on the TA, how about it?

Rock

Try reading this whole thread.
And please don't explain how someone can make love via the internet.

Chainsaw

Mike drop..................

TonyC

So, to summarize ...
So, there we are. Have you already got that extra bonus spent?






.

FDXLAG

I just logged on to PFC today and you wont believe it, the company is trying to bribe us into voting yes with free Pilot Flu shots. Don't fall for their tricks, stay strong.

2dogs

That's pretty mature. You need to get a life and step away from the computer. This forum must be your raison d'être..............SAD. The fact that you're for the TA, is enough reason for me to be against it.

FDXLAG

I guess the conspiracy theory nerve is the most sensitive and easiest to touch. But you have discovered my plan I am secretly a no voter and am trying to alienate people into voting no. It is a great plan but I am outnumbered on here by others trying to alienate no voters into voting yes. Peace out.

Rock

Oh Tony. Predictable as ever. The reason I linked that post in the last thread was so I could go back and find it when you tried to muddle your way through defending it. We already went through this discussion once. I had already quoted exactly what MA said, but I'll do it again. According to MA, we have to be ready to do whatever it takes, including, "...if it comes to it and after the end of the RLA process, standing alongside your fellow union members in a picket line without a paycheck to achieve our goals."
Standing in a picket line without a paycheck after the end of the RLA process can only be a strike Tony. Unless you now want to argue he meant after the TA is signed, we resign from FedEx and then picket. Or, you could go back to your embarrassing analogy that despite you saying you were willing to die while you served in the military, you didn't, so it's ok for MA to imply we might actually have to strike because he knows we won't actually end up making that sacrifice. Which besides being a defacto admission that MA is talking about striking, completely ignores the fact that most people who serve/served in the military don't use the fact that they may well die in service as a cheap rallying cry to show how tough they might have to be but of course, wink wink, nudge nudge, we all know it will never come to that.
As for the rest, I accused you of pointing out "a typo or other similar error of mine" and using that error to attempt to refute an entire argument. You can try to do the same thing here. It doesn't work.

Rock

Back in your role as selective internet nanny. Is it less sad to log into an internet site to tell people you don't know to log off? And since you limit your concerns about excessive internet usage to yes voters, have you given up caring about no voters? If so, that's kind of sad too.