Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Neg Comm Update - Signing Bonus Upped >

Neg Comm Update - Signing Bonus Upped

Search

Notices

Neg Comm Update - Signing Bonus Upped

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2015, 12:50 PM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 360
Default

Originally Posted by trashhauler
Hey GRD, where in the TA do you find that there will be more VTO lines? What I saw in the TA is what we have now. All known flying will be built into lines. No where in there does it say they will have the ability to increase the percentage of VTO lines.
All known flying means trip lines. R days are not known flying.

Let's look at it this way. Say the company and SIG have to build 100 total lines. 70 are trip lines. 30 are reserve lines. Before, 100%, or all 100, were built prior to VTO's. Now, 70 trip lines will be built, 24 R lines are built, and 6 R lines are put directly into VTO's. Those were not there before. More VTO's...
BlackKnight is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 01:54 PM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by kronan
And if you get a 60 hour trip, why wouldn't two (or more depending on the VTO BLG target) 6 CH trips be available?
It is likely there would be plenty of 6 CH trips available. However, if the top priority is to drive each pilot as close as possible to a specific BLG target, and the reserve days gets you closer to the target, it may be likely that you get the reserve days. The company can clear this up in writing (if we are reading this incorrectly) if they wanted to, no problem. In fact, do it now. And while they're at it, specifically explain to us how the current ADOPT system that they're using for VTOs works. Don't leave it to people to speculate, and potentially get it wrong. Why is this a secret? I don't want to spread any bad information, I just want to understand how things work and what is true.

Originally Posted by kronan

But even if the trips are available, wouldn't it be nice to sign up for 3 or 4 R days with 60+CHs of leveling in hopes of not getting launched.
If that was your choice, sure. And it might be, if you live in Memphis. However, if it's not your choice and you're a commuter, you might be paying for several nights in a hotel, to sit and do nothing. Or they could put it before that 60 hour trip, giving you no leveling.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 02:16 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Walrus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: Socket Drawer
Posts: 1,797
Default

On a VTO, you do not get leveled for trips you fly, unless they are flown on your reserve days.
The Walrus is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 02:20 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,419
Default

I thought we were writing about LAX guys, and now we're back in Memphis. Isn't it even more likely that there'd be a plethora if trips to fill a Senior VTO line, since they'll be built in Seniority Order?

And Turn the page back to 598....I guess I must really misunderstand the English language, because I thought Final Acceptance really means Final Acceptance.

And In the absence of agreement, the SLR shall not be implemented....means barring CDs agreement, the SLR SHALL NOT BE IMPLEMENTED.

Thanks for clarifying that 'soft, permissive' contract language
kronan is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 02:49 PM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by kronan
I thought we were writing about LAX guys, and now we're back in Memphis. Isn't it even more likely that there'd be a plethora if trips to fill a Senior VTO line, since they'll be built in Seniority Order?
Substitute LAX for Memphis, and there you go, same difference.

That would be accurate if VTOs were fully built in true seniority order. Meaning all trips open that didn't conflict were assigned to the #1 guy, until he hit the max value. Then on down the line. But it doesn't actually work like that.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 03:32 PM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2cylinderdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 732
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12
Substitute LAX for Memphis, and there you go, same difference.

That would be accurate if VTOs were fully built in true seniority order. Meaning all trips open that didn't conflict were assigned to the #1 guy, until he hit the max value. Then on down the line. But it doesn't actually work like that.
How does it work then? Because if you are number one (or whatever number you are) and you submit a request sheet that; at the time your line is built has 1. all requested trips still open (not taken by view/add etc) and 2. the line value is within the range and legal, then you get those trips. If anything other than that happens you should be calling ALPA. Generally people see trips they want go to pilots junior to them because of preferencing something else (days off, max blg etc) that conflicts with getting that trip.
2cylinderdriver is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 04:37 PM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 360
Default

Originally Posted by kronan

For those with the LAX example, are there any 60 hour trips currently? And if you get a 60 hour trip, why wouldn't two (or more depending on the VTO BLG target) 6 CH trips be available? But even if the trips are available, wouldn't it be nice to sign up for 3 or 4 R days with 60+CHs of leveling in hopes of not getting launched.

First, no- getting R days sucks, for commuters. The majority of us are.

Second, I think the days of being on reserve and having a decent chance of not getting called are dwindling. I understand we are undermanned now and not getting called on reserve is slim.

But I don't believe the company is going to man reserves like they used to. In the future I expect they'll push the limit of regular flyers, maximize reserve utilIzation, and fill in the blanks with folks willing to fly extra. Last, trip revise as needed.
BlackKnight is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 08:11 PM
  #128  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

Originally Posted by 2cylinderdriver
How does it work then? Because if you are number one (or whatever number you are) and you submit a request sheet that; at the time your line is built has 1. all requested trips still open (not taken by view/add etc) and 2. the line value is within the range and legal, then you get those trips. If anything other than that happens you should be calling ALPA. Generally people see trips they want go to pilots junior to them because of preferencing something else (days off, max blg etc) that conflicts with getting that trip.
And ALPA will tell you that those inputs are requests, and the company chose not to honor your request. Have a nice time on reserve. Next!
FXDX is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 08:42 PM
  #129  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX
And ALPA will tell you that those inputs are requests, and the company chose not to honor your request. Have a nice time on reserve. Next!
History is a beeoch - that's what they'll do.

Pipe
pipe is offline  
Old 10-15-2015, 09:42 PM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by 2cylinderdriver
How does it work then? Because if you are number one (or whatever number you are) and you submit a request sheet that; at the time your line is built has 1. all requested trips still open (not taken by view/add etc) and 2. the line value is within the range and legal, then you get those trips. If anything other than that happens you should be calling ALPA. Generally people see trips they want go to pilots junior to them because of preferencing something else (days off, max blg etc) that conflicts with getting that trip.
From what I have seen, that is how it goes, sometimes. And I've never been number one, or even close. There have been times that I can cross off all the trips in my request that went to CIC people, therefore unavailable, and everything I asked for that was left, that didn't go to senior VTO holders, went to me. Since I usually run out of trip requests, as you can only ask for so many (and at least 1/3 go to people in the conflict input processing window), eventually my line is filled out with unasked for junk. Everything as expected.

However....sometimes specifically requested trips go to junior VTO holders, sometimes they go unfilled, and stay in open time, and I get the crappiest VTO for a commuter that ever existed. How can this be? I always thought the way you did, and sometimes it works that way. However, I don't know if this is something they are experimenting with, something they have done for a long time...but you know when your VTO goes totally haywire, you think, what, did they forget to input my requests? What happened? I don't understand.

But I think I understand now. I saw a list of what the futures scheduler input, and I don't think any of this is their fault. It is the program. The number one request on that line wasn't the VTO holder's request, it was the companies. It was scored at a value of 100,000 points, and it was to build to a certain credit hour value. Don't remember exactly how it was phrased. The number two request was the VTO holders #1 request, scored at 100 points. It was obvious to me that our requests are tiny, in comparison to the companies requests. They build to their requirements first, and I feel that the reason why the VTO's get so screwed up sometimes is because they will use a trip to make the perfect credit hour value to a VTO holder junior to you. Your seniority doesn't mean as much as company requests. I wonder how often they change the companies requests, but I know they mean far more than yours.

Anyone else know any specific data points? Sure would be nice to know the rules under which we are working, instead of thinking we were randomly screwed, when there actually is a method to the madness.
busdriver12 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
andy171773
Regional
38
11-19-2007 10:57 AM
captainkudzu
Regional
11
04-12-2007 04:01 PM
desertdog71
Regional
7
03-17-2007 08:49 AM
fedupbusdriver
Cargo
13
10-20-2006 05:36 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
10
07-02-2006 03:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices