Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Same playbook-FedEx, SWA, Delta TA? >

Same playbook-FedEx, SWA, Delta TA?

Search

Notices

Same playbook-FedEx, SWA, Delta TA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2015, 09:49 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
.

Remember the Old and Simple Rule. If Management(s) wants it, it's Bad for us.
Ah, not necessarily. It seems like there are definitely win/win scenarios in this TA. However, I feel like it those scenarios are getting charged and paid for by the pilots, instead of being considered zero cost items.

For example, seems like newhire pay should not be considered a cost. It's what the company needs to do to attract qualified pilots. The die trying (is that what they call it?) shouldn't cost, it's a win for the company, and something many of our pilots would like. Also, retirement notification shouldn't be considered a cost, it keeps people through peak of 2016, an incentive that shouldn't be paid for through other concessions.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 10-12-2015, 03:26 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

And that Ladies and Gentlemen is the difference between tactical and strategic thinking. You mention: "It seems like there are definitely win/win scenarios in this TA". The company is considering the TA in its entirety. Just sayin'.
Jetjok is offline  
Old 10-12-2015, 06:46 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 43
Default

Good thing y'all voted GOP the last 40 years and failed to support Labor in general. This writing has been on the wall for decades. Even the angst over the pension for YOU. If you would have supported pensions for others, maybe there would be support out there for yours.
azoomietheist is offline  
Old 10-12-2015, 07:23 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by azoomietheist
Good thing y'all voted GOP the last 40 years and failed to support Labor in general. This writing has been on the wall for decades. Even the angst over the pension for YOU. If you would have supported pensions for others, maybe there would be support out there for yours.
Funny, you mean ALPA PAC money has been going to Republicans all these years? For some strange reason, I thought it had been going to Democrats.

And if everyone had voted Democrat, there would be pensions for all, with our pensions increasing? Another hilarious statement. You must realize that our fine president and other Democrats don't look at us as labor. We are the filthy, evil rich, who must be taxed beyond infinity.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 10-12-2015, 07:47 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12
Ah, not necessarily. It seems like there are definitely win/win scenarios in this TA. However, I feel like it those scenarios are getting charged and paid for by the pilots, instead of being considered zero cost items.

For example, seems like newhire pay should not be considered a cost. It's what the company needs to do to attract qualified pilots. The die trying (is that what they call it?) shouldn't cost, it's a win for the company, and something many of our pilots would like. Also, retirement notification shouldn't be considered a cost, it keeps people through peak of 2016, an incentive that shouldn't be paid for through other concessions.

You just made my Point. If Management really wanted New Hire Pay to double, they could have made that happen in the 2011 Bridge contract. ALPA proposed to raise new hire Training pay. It was a good thing for our new hires but make no mistake it came at a cost in some other area.

Sorry, I think the Rule still stands. If Management Wants it, it is Generally Bad for us.

1. PBS
2. Freeze A-Plan
3. Any work rule Proposal by them
4. Lay Flat seats vice Business or First
4. 8 in 24
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 10-12-2015, 08:41 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DLax85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,200
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
You just made my Point. If Management really wanted New Hire Pay to double, they could have made that happen in the 2011 Bridge contract. ALPA proposed to raise new hire Training pay. It was a good thing for our new hires but make no mistake it came at a cost in some other area.

Sorry, I think the Rule still stands. If Management Wants it, it is Generally Bad for us.

1. PBS
2. Freeze A-Plan
3. Any work rule Proposal by them
4. Lay Flat seats vice Business or First
4. 8 in 24
Sounds like a "focused Top 5"

This is what it will take if the TA is voted down and we want to achieve a more acceptable TA 2.0
DLax85 is offline  
Old 10-12-2015, 11:00 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sounds's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12
knowing full well that the next industry downturn was right around the corner,...
Considering many airlines are working with thin margins and profits are heavily relying on oil prices, and the cyclical nature of that... You're not too far off.
Sounds is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
norskman2
Regional
18
07-18-2011 02:26 AM
wannabepilot
Flight Schools and Training
34
07-07-2008 12:15 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM
vagabond
Cargo
15
03-18-2007 03:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices