Search

Notices

Why I am voting Yes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2015, 04:14 PM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 296
Default

Well, everybody has their idea of what is, "The right thing" to do when it comes to extra work. Is it draft, MUS, protect carryover? I'm not making excuses for anyone. I just know talking to guys, there are different views on whats right. I know guys who bid reserve and reserve carryover and protect it. They usually don't end up flying more, but they do get paid more. This is Anc base only. I recently flew with an FO who told me a Memphis FO is making their high five as an FO and the FO I was flying with thought that was OK. He felt anything but draft was fine.
Viper446 is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 04:22 PM
  #132  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12
I suspect I flew far less than you during that time period, inadvertently or not. I also suspect that many people who would now complain about it, did makeup during that time. It is easy to criticize others while doing what you complain about. I wonder how many people here, having flown plenty of draft and makeup, during current negotiations? Even the "hell no" voters?
Like PTB just said, "Prime example of what is wrong with this pilot group.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 05:18 PM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
Like PTB just said, "Prime example of what is wrong with this pilot group.
Maybe so. Another oddly curious thing to me is when I listen to people who were in aircraft that were not affected by 4.A.2.b, criticizing people in aircraft that were affected by it, for trying to bring their month back up to a normal line value. BLG's were very low for some of us, but I never heard about pilots in unaffected aircraft dropping 20-25 hours every bidmonth during the affected time period, in support of the rest of us, to match our ultra low BLGs. Anyone do that?
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 05:50 PM
  #134  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12
I suspect I flew far less than you during that time period, inadvertently or not. I also suspect that many people who would now complain about it, did makeup during that time. It is easy to criticize others while doing what you complain about. I wonder how many people here, having flown plenty of draft and makeup, during current negotiations? Even the "hell no" voters?

Some more rationalization. Simply unbelievable.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 06:05 PM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by iarapilot
Some more rationalization. Simply unbelievable.
? That's interesting. Here's a question for you. Were you in an aircraft that was affected by 4.A.2.b? If so, would you criticize people in your seat position that traded their 60 hour line up twelve hours? Did you ever trade up or do a makeup trip during that time? And if you weren't in an aircraft that was affected, did you drop 20-25 hours every month, in solidarity with your under utilized brothers and sisters?

If you can't see the hypocrisy in complaining about people with low BLG's trading up, while you are unaffected, I guess I have no way to explain it to you.

All last summer, I saw people working three out of every four weeks, and many who had recently closed their schedules. Some of whom I flew with, who acted like they were hard core willing to do what it whatever it took to get a contract. I suppose some may just see it as a difference of opinion, however, I see it as hypocrisy.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 06:20 PM
  #136  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12

Here's a question for you. Were you in an aircraft that was affected by 4.A.2.b? If so, would you criticize people in your seat position that traded their 60 hour line up twelve hours?

It's so easy to point to others' hypocrisy to distract attention from yourself. I think that's a tactic we learned as, what, 2-year-olds? Did you eat the cupcake? [With icing on face, pointing at sister] But she ate the ice cream!

The Company believes it's OK to remain in §4.A.2.b. while pilots are on furlough. So, if The Company furloughs 50 pilots, and you're in a seat position that's affected, would you be OK with flying extra while your fellow pilots were on the street? Would you feel better flying extra as long as other hypocrites were doing the same thing?






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 06:29 PM
  #137  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Gee, okay, Tony, whatever you say. I'm not quite sure what it was I said that was offensive. I personally have no problem with my fellow crewmembers who built up their low paying lines a little. I did not, but not as a moral imperative, but because I flew very low hours for many years. I'm not sure why you would have a problem with that, so I ask the same questions to you,
" Were you in an aircraft that was affected by 4.A.2.b? If so, would you criticize people in your seat position that traded their 60 hour line up twelve hours? Did you ever trade up or do a makeup trip during that time? And if you weren't in an aircraft that was affected, did you drop 20-25 hours every month, in solidarity with your under utilized brothers and sisters?"

Are you willing to answer that?

And to answer your question, not only would I not fly extra during a furlough, I would drop as many trips as humanly possible. I have been furloughed, and would do whatever it takes to have my fellow FedEx pilots not be. I know how crappy it feels.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 06:46 PM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12
Maybe so. Another oddly curious thing to me is when I listen to people who were in aircraft that were not affected by 4.A.2.b, criticizing people in aircraft that were affected by it, for trying to bring their month back up to a normal line value. BLG's were very low for some of us, but I never heard about pilots in unaffected aircraft dropping 20-25 hours every bidmonth during the affected time period, in support of the rest of us, to match our ultra low BLGs. Anyone do that?
Can't speak to what others did. I was Junior on the MD. Does that count?
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 06:49 PM
  #139  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12

Gee, okay, Tony, whatever you say. I'm not quite sure what it was I said that was offensive. I personally have no problem with my fellow crewmembers who built up their low paying lines a little. I did not, but not as a moral imperative, but because I flew very low hours for many years. I'm not sure why you would have a problem with that, so I ask the same questions to you,
" Were you in an aircraft that was affected by 4.A.2.b? If so, would you criticize people in your seat position that traded their 60 hour line up twelve hours? Did you ever trade up or do a makeup trip during that time? And if you weren't in an aircraft that was affected, did you drop 20-25 hours every month, in solidarity with your under utilized brothers and sisters?"

Are you willing to answer that?

And to answer your question, not only would I not fly extra during a furlough, I would drop as many trips as humanly possible. I have been furloughed, and would do whatever it takes to have my fellow FedEx pilots not be. I know how crappy it feels.

Yes, I was in a seat that was affected, and to top things off, I was excessed to a lower-paying seat. I did not use Bid Line adjustment tools to fly more because I believe we could have been out of §4.A.2.b. in 2 months if everyone else had done the same. I am critical of people whose actions accrue to our detriment. I was taught before kindergarten that two wrongs do not make a right, so pointing out the existence of hypocrites has never been a justification for doing wrong myself.


I was also taught that good leaders lead by example, and I couldn't in good conscience justify writing to my constituents about their §4.A.2.b. pain while I was padding my own paycheck.


You asked, "Why would anyone care if someone flew makeup during 4.A.2.b?" Short answer: Because it hurt us.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 07:04 PM
  #140  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Thanks Tony. You said it for me. I probably would have just commented, again, "Unbelievable!"

I guess there are some that dont, or just refuse, to get it. If one cant understand that 4a2b would have been a lot shorter if one just worked as scheduled, there is no hope.
iarapilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hellsbells
FedEx
135
10-15-2015 09:15 AM
Fr8 Pup
Cargo
170
06-21-2012 10:03 PM
warbirdboy91
Hangar Talk
0
12-08-2011 09:57 AM
RockBottom
Regional
3
06-05-2008 04:44 PM
DLax85
Cargo
9
08-05-2007 06:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices