Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
A Perspective and Opinion of the Current TA >

A Perspective and Opinion of the Current TA

Search

Notices

A Perspective and Opinion of the Current TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2015, 04:30 PM
  #91  
Organizational Learning 
Thread Starter
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Rock
Um hmmm. And you seem content to

Did you forget the rest of your sentence, or did you fail to think of a comeback?






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 04:34 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by Rock
It gets us a little closer then sitting at our current pay rates for another couple years while we hope our next NC can coax more money out of the company than the last did. The same pesky math applies to the future as well. $5000 a year for a "signing bonus" doesn't compensate for the money we won't be earning without the 10% pay raise we would gain the first year of this TA.
Unless you assume the company will be willing to compensate us for rejecting the current TA they and our MEC agreed to.
Just remember the 2 initial TA's we turned down in 1995, 1996 were sweetened each time. We didn't even really have real UNION organization then. YMMV and past performance doesn't guarantee future returns. If this TA is voted down , not saying it will be, but if it is and the "Line Pilots" say we want it improved and mean it, it will get improved in my opinion. The company doesn't want open negotiations either. They want a Deal, just on their terms. Delta will settle their Pilots 2nd try, and UPS may get a contract soon, SWA might reject theirs or settle. Lots of variables, but if this TA doesn't get ratified, I am confident we will get it improved. Not saying it will be eye watering, not saying it will happen in a couple months, but my money is on it will happen.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 04:39 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
Did you forget the rest of your sentence, or did you fail to think of a comeback?


.
iPhone switchology. I'm getting old.
Rock is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 05:08 PM
  #94  
Organizational Learning 
Thread Starter
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Rock

Um hmmm. And you seem content to urge the troops to run ahead of you with no plan other than "go get me...erm...I mean us more money boys. Momma needs a new pair of shoes and I've spent my career counting on Uncle Smith to pay my way into the old folks home. Ready! Fire! Aim! Chaaaasrge! I'm right behind ya".

Yepp, that's exactly what I've been saying all along.

Good grief.





.
TonyC is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 05:10 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
Just remember the 2 initial TA's we turned down in 1995, 1996 were sweetened each time. We didn't even really have real UNION organization then. YMMV and past performance doesn't guarantee future returns. If this TA is voted down , not saying it will be, but if it is and the "Line Pilots" say we want it improved and mean it, it will get improved in my opinion. The company doesn't want open negotiations either. They want a Deal, just on their terms. Delta will settle their Pilots 2nd try, and UPS may get a contract soon, SWA might reject theirs or settle. Lots of variables, but if this TA doesn't get ratified, I am confident we will get it improved. Not saying it will be eye watering, not saying it will happen in a couple months, but my money is on it will happen.
If we vote it down, I certainly hope you're right. Currently Richard Anderson is on record as saying the next Delta contract will offer less than the TA they rejected. That statement has about the same value as "we deserve more", but at least publicly, Delta management did not take the rejection of their TA as some form of leverage that they want to resolve quickly. There is no word over there on when negotiations will even start again.
And if we have to negotiate a second TA that takes a year or more and isn't eye wateringly better than the current TA, we will have won the battle and lost the war. It will take something eye watering to make up for giving up the current proposed pay raise alone. 10% more than my current pay for a year is worth a heck of a lot more in the long run than $5k per year of signing bonus we got with this TA. And since it would be us delaying a new contract this time around, I doubt the company is going to be feeling really charitable about extra compensation for our vote to extend negotiations.
With all that said...I share your hope if we end up voting this TA down. Fast, eye watering resolution. Sounds pretty good.
Rock is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 05:19 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
Yepp, that's exactly what I've been saying all along.

Good grief.

.
Funny. That's exactly what I thought when I read your Uncle Remus dialogue about me. Maybe we should both try to keep our discussion above the tar baby level.
Rock is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 05:22 PM
  #97  
Organizational Learning 
Thread Starter
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Rock

There is no word over there on when negotiations will even start again.

This TA came before the amendable date of their current CBA. Even if they don't talk again before the amendable date, they will be required by the RLA to negotiate when the CBA becomes amendable if either party opens. It's not as if Delta can decide they don't want to ever talk again. They thought they could buy off their pilots on the cheap. They miscalculated.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 05:25 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,199
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC
This TA came before the amendable date of their current CBA. Even if they don't talk again before the amendable date, they will be required by the RLA to negotiate when the CBA becomes amendable if either party opens. It's not as if Delta can decide they don't want to ever talk again. They thought they could buy off their pilots on the cheap. They miscalculated.

.
It is too early to say they miscalculated. We won't know for sure until the second TA is cut. Don't buy your captain's house until you're a captain, and don't start spending your new contract money until it's ratified. ...or start admiring another pilot group until they've won their war.
Rock is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 05:30 PM
  #99  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Rock, are you a lawyer? I ask because you seem to be able to rationalize any response that you present....almost.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 09-27-2015, 05:33 PM
  #100  
Organizational Learning 
Thread Starter
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Rock

Funny. That's exactly what I thought when I read your Uncle Remus dialogue about me. Maybe we should both try to keep our discussion above the tar baby level.

Other than the dialect, I can't imagine how you got Uncle Remus out of that. He told stories about animals, folktales, fables. He has nothing to do with your seeming willingness to bow down to the demands of The Company and accept the table scraps they're willing to part with. If playing the part of a plantation hand reminds you of a tar baby, I don't know how we can help you.


(If I had intended to compare you with Uncle Remus, that would have been a compliment. Don't flatter yourself.)






.
TonyC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
alfaromeo
Major
87
06-21-2012 03:48 AM
tallplt
Major
28
06-17-2012 10:23 AM
Rogue24
Major
104
06-15-2012 04:49 AM
iarapilot
Cargo
0
07-17-2007 02:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices