term sheet a kick in pants
02-07-2024, 01:47 PM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Posts: 129
What guideline was violated? Again, it was run through ALPA legal.
You said the strike vote was just symbolic:
He did not violate the policy you quoted. Do you have a different policy in mind that he might have violated?
He posted the membership list of the public whatsapp group which requires full name to join. That's public info. The group is open for anyone to join. If you put yourself in the public sphere of social media using your full name and phone number, you're not entitled to the privacy policy that you quoted above, and it would be naïve to be upset when you're mentioned by name as being a member of a public group or held accountable for saying something in that group that you might later regret.
If they are trying to bust him on that, they're exposing themselves to some serious liability.
You said the strike vote was just symbolic:
He did not violate the policy you quoted. Do you have a different policy in mind that he might have violated?
He posted the membership list of the public whatsapp group which requires full name to join. That's public info. The group is open for anyone to join. If you put yourself in the public sphere of social media using your full name and phone number, you're not entitled to the privacy policy that you quoted above, and it would be naïve to be upset when you're mentioned by name as being a member of a public group or held accountable for saying something in that group that you might later regret.
If they are trying to bust him on that, they're exposing themselves to some serious liability.
02-07-2024, 02:49 PM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Crewmember
Posts: 1,395
This used to be called "hostage taking", and the union leadership used to inform the crew force of the situation and state that no TA would be approved until the hostages were released.
Of course, we hear crickets from the current leadership. I wonder way?
02-07-2024, 04:31 PM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Crewmember
Posts: 1,395
Probably on the advice of his lawyer after he was placed in NOQ status.
This used to be called "hostage taking", and the union leadership used to inform the crew force of the situation and state that no TA would be approved until the hostages were released.
Of course, we hear crickets from the current leadership. I wonder way?
This used to be called "hostage taking", and the union leadership used to inform the crew force of the situation and state that no TA would be approved until the hostages were released.
Of course, we hear crickets from the current leadership. I wonder way?
02-07-2024, 05:06 PM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 187
If what he did was against company policy, he would have been NOQed immediately instead of several weeks later. They likely had to wait until they could trip him up on some other technicality.
Nearly everyone saw it, and it's still floating around for those that didn't.
02-07-2024, 05:09 PM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2021
Posts: 106
Just about anyone at DAL or UAL would have a copy. That’s where I saw it in the first place, word traveled hella fast.
02-07-2024, 06:33 PM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 114
Probably on the advice of his lawyer after he was placed in NOQ status.
This used to be called "hostage taking", and the union leadership used to inform the crew force of the situation and state that no TA would be approved until the hostages were released.
Of course, we hear crickets from the current leadership. I wonder way?
This used to be called "hostage taking", and the union leadership used to inform the crew force of the situation and state that no TA would be approved until the hostages were released.
Of course, we hear crickets from the current leadership. I wonder way?
Shameful.
The SM plays dirty. Y'all be careful out there.
02-07-2024, 09:47 PM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 182
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
