Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Any reason to stay at FedEx 40s or younger? >

Any reason to stay at FedEx 40s or younger?

Search

Notices

Any reason to stay at FedEx 40s or younger?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2024, 06:29 AM
  #361  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by JustInFacts
Maybe we are only 250 overmanned now, but that doesn't include the loss of postal flying that will occure in October. If it did include that, they wouldn't be buying up lines in almost every fleet but the 777. I agree that a furlough is unlikely. However, look where the bottom 100 pilots on the seniority list are. Time will tell, but the pilots on the 777 haven't experienced the low credit hour lines that the other fleets have.
Maybe they wouldn't have to buy up lines if they pulled the cans that are riding as belly freight and put those cans in Fedex hulls.
acecrackshot is offline  
Old 08-28-2024, 06:29 AM
  #362  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Thrust Hold's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Position: 757 CA
Posts: 613
Default

Don't you guys think that 4.a.2.b/c would alleviate an overstaffing issue (of 250) sheerly by hour reductions and negate the need for furloughs?
Thrust Hold is offline  
Old 08-28-2024, 06:35 AM
  #363  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by Thrust Hold
Don't you guys think that 4.a.2.b/c would alleviate an overstaffing issue (of 250) sheerly by hour reductions and negate the need for furloughs?
I think if any furloughs occur they will be solely as a negotiation tactic, and not reflective of business or operational realities.
acecrackshot is offline  
Old 08-28-2024, 07:05 AM
  #364  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Thrust Hold's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Position: 757 CA
Posts: 613
Default

Originally Posted by acecrackshot
I think if any furloughs occur they will be solely as a negotiation tactic, and not reflective of business or operational realities.
I can see them using 4.a.2.b/c as a negotiation tactic and no real need for furloughs in that regard. Just keep the pilot group at reduced hours for the majority of next year and see how that impacts the votes when they finally reach another TA next year.
Thrust Hold is offline  
Old 08-28-2024, 08:02 AM
  #365  
Gets Weekends Off
 
opt0712's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 703
Default

Originally Posted by Thrust Hold
I can see them using 4.a.2.b/c as a negotiation tactic and no real need for furloughs in that regard. Just keep the pilot group at reduced hours for the majority of next year and see how that impacts the votes when they finally reach another TA next year.
Ding Ding Ding! This. No doubt with Dietrich aboard Raj co. they will do this. Perfectly legal by the CBA and saves even more money for shareholders.
opt0712 is offline  
Old 08-28-2024, 11:38 AM
  #366  
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Merle Haggard's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 877
Default

Originally Posted by opt0712
Ding Ding Ding! This. No doubt with Dietrich aboard Raj co. they will do this. Perfectly legal by the CBA and saves even more money for shareholders.
And this is why 4.a.2.b and c need to go now. It is of no benefit to us now that we are working with a fully adverserial management.

We will be seasonal employees going in and out of 4.a.2.c for the rest of our careers.
Merle Haggard is offline  
Old 08-28-2024, 11:44 AM
  #367  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2023
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by Thrust Hold
I can see them using 4.a.2.b/c as a negotiation tactic and no real need for furloughs in that regard. Just keep the pilot group at reduced hours for the majority of next year and see how that impacts the votes when they finally reach another TA next year.
They can't go below the conctractual 68/85 minimum unless the SAM goes below 64 hours and we enter 4a2c. Then it also becomes more difficult for the company. This includes a bid to realign the crew force. There are also restrictions on the lowest paying line and highest paying lines amongst all bid packs. This would severely limit their current flexibilty in the 777. I don't think they are paying 25%-50% of the crew force hours they didn't work just to get us to accept a sub-par contract.
JustInFacts is offline  
Old 08-28-2024, 12:27 PM
  #368  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Thrust Hold's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Position: 757 CA
Posts: 613
Default

Originally Posted by JustInFacts
They can't go below the conctractual 68/85 minimum unless the SAM goes below 64 hours and we enter 4a2c. Then it also becomes more difficult for the company. This includes a bid to realign the crew force. There are also restrictions on the lowest paying line and highest paying lines amongst all bid packs. This would severely limit their current flexibilty in the 777. I don't think they are paying 25%-50% of the crew force hours they didn't work just to get us to accept a sub-par contract.
I'm well versed on those sections of the contract. Not sure which fleet you're on, but I'm pretty sure that nearly everyone on the 757, Airbus, and 767 is currently getting buyup pay ("hours they didn't work"). I've been getting bought up for the last year plus on the 757 and the amount of buyup has gotten larger every month. They can certainly spread those hours out amongst the fleets and move that SAM closer to the contractual parameters.

Does keeping the MD's around longer than planned help or hurt their flexibiity on the 777?

11 - 767 deliveries next year can replace all MD-11 domestic flying and take on some International burden.

2 - 777 deliveries add to the mix in 2025 as well.

Last edited by Thrust Hold; 08-28-2024 at 12:39 PM.
Thrust Hold is offline  
Old 08-29-2024, 06:54 AM
  #369  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2023
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by Thrust Hold
I'm well versed on those sections of the contract. Not sure which fleet you're on, but I'm pretty sure that nearly everyone on the 757, Airbus, and 767 is currently getting buyup pay ("hours they didn't work"). I've been getting bought up for the last year plus on the 757 and the amount of buyup has gotten larger every month. They can certainly spread those hours out amongst the fleets and move that SAM closer to the contractual parameters.

Does keeping the MD's around longer than planned help or hurt their flexibiity on the 777?

11 - 767 deliveries next year can replace all MD-11 domestic flying and take on some International burden.

2 - 777 deliveries add to the mix in 2025 as well.
So, when are the reduced hours for most of our pilots that you spoke of early going to start? The earliest that we could enter 4a2c is December.

As far as buy up goes, it depends on your seat. In SEP, the MEM 75 FO seat had 57 lines that did not get a buy up. The MEM 76 CAP seat had 271 lines that did not get bought up. Those don't include secondary lines.

Moving hours from one bid pack to another will not change the SAM, it is a system average.

A 767 doesn't carry nearly the same amount of freight that an MD-11 carries. So no, I don't think that 11 767 deliveries can take over all of the MD-11 domestice flying plus some of their international flying. Do you think the company puts an MD-11 on a route that a 767 could fly just for kicks? Delivery of 2 777's can take over for 2 MD-11's.
JustInFacts is offline  
Old 08-29-2024, 08:32 AM
  #370  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Thrust Hold's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Position: 757 CA
Posts: 613
Default

It sounds like the reduced hours will be sneak previewed in October.

November, December, and January are likely to be elevated by Peak flying.

Reducing hours across the board will lower the SAM.

Keeping MD's and taking new 777 & 767 will alleviate the the lopsided utilization of A/C throughout the network.

SAM will no longer be proped up by the 777 & MD-11 bidpacks alone.

There's likely fewer destinations domestically that require an MD-11 when you remove the USPS freight.

I could see a late Spring/early Summer intro to 4.a.2.b/c, but that depends on how agressive management gets with the system changes.
Thrust Hold is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rk772
Major
60
12-06-2022 05:31 PM
767pilot
UPS
34
01-19-2022 12:45 PM
howardhughes8
FedEx
9
10-21-2019 07:25 AM
charleyvarrick
Cargo
34
08-27-2011 11:10 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
05-16-2005 06:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices