Quote:
The entire concept is akin to having an abortion, hoping that the next baby will be more acceptable.
But hey- you do you, I’ll weigh the entirety of the agreement and vote up or down based on the merits of the final product.
This entire statement codifies why this pilot group is the weakest I've been apart of in nearly 30 years in this business.Originally Posted by FDX1
That is the most moronic sentiment and. Shows zero thought about the seriousness of this post.The entire concept is akin to having an abortion, hoping that the next baby will be more acceptable.
But hey- you do you, I’ll weigh the entirety of the agreement and vote up or down based on the merits of the final product.
We've telegraphed the concessionary horse trading mentality that we have from the beginning. The notion that we were going to "amend" vitally important parts of the contract outside of section 6 says everything we need to know about what the leadership believes is the right direction.
I don't need to wait to read that. Sometimes the baby is stillborn and ya know it in advance.
But you go on ahead.
We are in a position where we are given praise for team effort, but also given the same old "you're a cost to be minimized" treatment. The scary thing is many of the clowns in this joint actually believe that's the way things SHOULD be.
As to this oft repeated, entirely wrong, and misguided prattle about public negotiation, nothing said in this or any other forum matters to negotiations. What matters is WILL YOU ACCEPT ANY CONCESSIONS IN A TA presented? Its pretty damn clear to me lots of folks here will and the NC believes that too. I've been through several airline contract negotiations including at least one other here and never once was the deciding factor what someone said on the internet.