Negotiations
#191
New Hire
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 6
#192
New Hire
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 6
Overall, I wasn't as pessimistic as you are.
From my memory, they talked about getting management to back off of their reverse 4a2b proposal. NC was able to reduce expense report issues by reducing the amount of receipts required and requiring a timeframe to fix issues before payroll deduction. Hours of service is down to one open item. If I guessed, it probably deals with getting more realistic rest opportunities. Deadheading still has substantial differences with three open items still remaining, one of them being a large item. As for scope, they received no counter. NC has proposed some belly freight language and trying to make it more expensive for management to wet lease. Retirement, as you said, bankruptcy era, from before current language that has enhancements such as cap over cap and tax advantaged health accounts. Also, management asked to renegotiate covid MOUs so NC is asking to make travel bank changes permanent. Wet lease payments being calculated. And no more handshake deals for instructors. Oh and TPE hotel still sucks. The hotel is mandated by government and other airlines have to stay there as well. But should see improvements in meals. That's what I remember.
From my memory, they talked about getting management to back off of their reverse 4a2b proposal. NC was able to reduce expense report issues by reducing the amount of receipts required and requiring a timeframe to fix issues before payroll deduction. Hours of service is down to one open item. If I guessed, it probably deals with getting more realistic rest opportunities. Deadheading still has substantial differences with three open items still remaining, one of them being a large item. As for scope, they received no counter. NC has proposed some belly freight language and trying to make it more expensive for management to wet lease. Retirement, as you said, bankruptcy era, from before current language that has enhancements such as cap over cap and tax advantaged health accounts. Also, management asked to renegotiate covid MOUs so NC is asking to make travel bank changes permanent. Wet lease payments being calculated. And no more handshake deals for instructors. Oh and TPE hotel still sucks. The hotel is mandated by government and other airlines have to stay there as well. But should see improvements in meals. That's what I remember.
#193
New Hire
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 6
I remember the same as you. This was his first post and he definitely formulated a different view compared to what I heard. The money fight will happen in the next two months once none large money items are TAd. This is the time we need the entire pilot group to fly the contract. Currently we just a few and numerous acting as subcontractors.
The Chairman also said clearly draft/ava is our choice and the union will defend all pilots who choose not to partake.
The Chairman also said clearly draft/ava is our choice and the union will defend all pilots who choose not to partake.
#194
New Hire
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 6
That is a false statement. Read business necessity jumpseat language in the CBA. They used this in HKG prior to the travel MOU. They just simply made everyone a reserve and built the trips outside the bidpack per the CBA. They then just assigned them to everyone who was on reserve. Problem solved. In the mean time all pilots in HKG lost the ability to bid a line and the days they wanted to work. A lot of the gains from the travel MOU would also be lost such as 100% bank value and rental car ability.
Let’s start with getting everybody just flying the contract. That alone would get them to the bargaining table. This is a simple game of pressure and we are losing because of pilot greed.
Let’s start with getting everybody just flying the contract. That alone would get them to the bargaining table. This is a simple game of pressure and we are losing because of pilot greed.
Ask you rep on this one as well.
#195
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,140
Well maybe your pessimism comes purely from the timeline. I’m very patient. I’m willing to wait for a great contract. So the timeline is not a concern to me yet. I was more pessimistic in the amount of items being negotiated but it seems I’m in the minority on that.
#196
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 155
Perhaps if the NC were not trying to sell us the pancake plan, more pilots would support them.
Perhaps if the NC were honest about what their goals are with respect to how to improve the retirement section, more would support them.
When I am fed BS surveys, and being told what we are bargaining for is a "secret", I am reminded of the crap sandwich they sold us in 2015.
I know there are many on the property that were not here in 2015, but we need to do our due diligence, and not necessarily believe what our union tells us.
It is pretty sad when you can't trust your own union, but that is what is going on here.
The surest way to get what we want is to vote down the first TA if it does not meet our goals. That would show our resolve.
If it passes again at 57 percent, we have lost.
In the past, the company has dragged out negotiations for two years past the amendable date of every contract. I don't think that will work out as well for them this time, as it gives more time for others to get a contract, and more time for inflation to affect us, which means we will demand more.
Mark my words, I want a good contract, but the NC is not doing the crew force any favors by the way they are acting.
I had a new guy tell me the 3200 new hires since the last contract would dictate the terms of our retirement to the old guys.
This, after we gave up a lot to keep one retirement in 2015, after we could have thrown them under the bus.
You want to split the crew force, just give the new hires a better deal than the old guys, and you will have infighting like you wouldn't believe.
The union needs to improve retirement for all of us, not just enough of us to get to 51%.
I am prepared to vote no. I will have to be convinced to vote yes.
I shouldn't have to worry about "my" union lying to me, but I am, and I have a huge problem with that.
Perhaps if the NC were honest about what their goals are with respect to how to improve the retirement section, more would support them.
When I am fed BS surveys, and being told what we are bargaining for is a "secret", I am reminded of the crap sandwich they sold us in 2015.
I know there are many on the property that were not here in 2015, but we need to do our due diligence, and not necessarily believe what our union tells us.
It is pretty sad when you can't trust your own union, but that is what is going on here.
The surest way to get what we want is to vote down the first TA if it does not meet our goals. That would show our resolve.
If it passes again at 57 percent, we have lost.
In the past, the company has dragged out negotiations for two years past the amendable date of every contract. I don't think that will work out as well for them this time, as it gives more time for others to get a contract, and more time for inflation to affect us, which means we will demand more.
Mark my words, I want a good contract, but the NC is not doing the crew force any favors by the way they are acting.
I had a new guy tell me the 3200 new hires since the last contract would dictate the terms of our retirement to the old guys.
This, after we gave up a lot to keep one retirement in 2015, after we could have thrown them under the bus.
You want to split the crew force, just give the new hires a better deal than the old guys, and you will have infighting like you wouldn't believe.
The union needs to improve retirement for all of us, not just enough of us to get to 51%.
I am prepared to vote no. I will have to be convinced to vote yes.
I shouldn't have to worry about "my" union lying to me, but I am, and I have a huge problem with that.
#197
#200
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2021
Posts: 442
Again, we need to remain focused.
We don not know our ask,
The MEC is still failing to lead.
The new officers have not posted any message about who they are and their direction forward.
SPSC's page on the FDX MEC's website is a joke. Especially during contract negotiations, did this sneak up on them?
Those who are happy with the current contract are still happy.
Those who are not happy are still apathetic for the most part.
Those who say they are a "no vote" still won't show up for the most part and demand their reps do their job or replace them with some one who will do the job.
What we have here is the definition of insanity. Some are happy, some are not, some are failing to lead and the vast majority don't care enough yet to do anything about it except complain on the crewbus.
The clock continues to tick, and May is just two bid cycles away. Do something or not, either way it's just around the corner and we only have ourselves to blame.
We will get the contract we deserve, eventually.
We don not know our ask,
The MEC is still failing to lead.
The new officers have not posted any message about who they are and their direction forward.
SPSC's page on the FDX MEC's website is a joke. Especially during contract negotiations, did this sneak up on them?
Those who are happy with the current contract are still happy.
Those who are not happy are still apathetic for the most part.
Those who say they are a "no vote" still won't show up for the most part and demand their reps do their job or replace them with some one who will do the job.
What we have here is the definition of insanity. Some are happy, some are not, some are failing to lead and the vast majority don't care enough yet to do anything about it except complain on the crewbus.
The clock continues to tick, and May is just two bid cycles away. Do something or not, either way it's just around the corner and we only have ourselves to blame.
We will get the contract we deserve, eventually.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post