Search

Notices

Why I chose FedEX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2018, 06:29 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by HIFLYR
Nothing against military guys and gals, respect the service for us. However those 2500 hr RJ guys are working in the system we operate in everday and probably doing wing low cross wind landings to boot. Just Saying
Completely agree, 100%. I was one of them. All civilian here. However, 2500TT with zero 121 TPIC and sitting in class at UAL/DAL... I don’t know if I’m entirely onboard with that. My 2000 hours TPIC as an RJ captain and eventually LCA, was invaluable.
Rsv4lyfe is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 06:34 PM
  #12  
Thx Age 65
 
HoursHore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: MD11CAP
Posts: 1,041
Default

Guys lose money after year two if they drop FDX trips for mil. As a guy who flies with many new guys, I'd say it's 60-40 mil-civ, with many already having a mixed back ground, i.e. FDX isn't their first rodeo. Pretty sure there is no boogeyman pulling the strings to keep mil guys out.
HoursHore is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 06:36 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Default

Originally Posted by Rsv4lyfe
However, 2500TT with zero 121 TPIC and sitting in class at UAL/DAL... I don’t know if I’m entirely onboard with that.
What, exactly, are you not onboard with?
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 06:46 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
What does this even mean?
Many of the AOA Types have not done a winglow crosswond landing in many years. These are the types of crosswind landings we do. I did not realize the C17 does not also past a certain flap setting, untill I was working with a C17 guy on his crosswind landings.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 06:57 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: Captain
Posts: 278
Default

multiple threads ? venting ? axe to grind ?
BarrySeal is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 07:42 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
What, exactly, are you not onboard with?
I think having some TPIC, when there military or civilian is an invaluable experience. I’ve alwags thought people hired at the majors without it missed out on a great opportunity for professsional growth.
Rsv4lyfe is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 08:11 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Default

Originally Posted by Rsv4lyfe
I think having some TPIC, when there military or civilian is an invaluable experience. I’ve alwags thought people hired at the majors without it missed out on a great opportunity for professsional growth.
Your statement specified 121 TPIC. So, you made it sound like you had some issue with a mil guy with plenty of PIC time just not 121 PIC sitting in a UAL/DAL class.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 08:14 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Default

Originally Posted by HIFLYR
Many of the AOA Types have not done a winglow crosswond landing in many years. These are the types of crosswind landings we do. I did not realize the C17 does not also past a certain flap setting, untill I was working with a C17 guy on his crosswind landings.
I figured it was something like that. Ok, pardon me while a scoff a little. This "system" we all operate in now is hardly as challenging as you're making it out to be.

As far as cross-wind landings? We're talking basic flight control inputs. You really think it's valid to turn away someone with loads of experience because they lack recency in something as basic as a cross-wind landing? I seriously doubt the majority of guys coming here from whatever background are going to find a basic cross-wind landing that difficult. You want to give me an exception to the rule story about some "AOA Type" that had a tough time with cross-winds in a heavy transport category aircraft? Whatever. I'm sure we can find an RJ guy who struggled with that or something else. I know a few of the one's I've flown with recently could use some remedial radio training. But there's the 5% in every group.

Plenty of "value" in a mix of new hires from various prior walks of aviation life.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 08:17 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
Your statement specified 121 TPIC. So, you made it sound like you had some issue with a mil guy with plenty of PIC time just not 121 PIC sitting in a UAL/DAL class.
Oh no. I meant a civilian with 2500TT and no TPIC.

Big difference. Sorry for the confusion.
Rsv4lyfe is offline  
Old 02-21-2018, 08:28 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
I figured it was something like that. Ok, pardon me while a scoff a little. This "system" we all operate in now is hardly as challenging as you're making it out to be.

As far as cross-wind landings? We're talking basic flight control inputs. You really think it's valid to turn away someone with loads of experience because they lack recency in something as basic as a cross-wind landing? I seriously doubt the majority of guys coming here from whatever background are going to find a basic cross-wind landing that difficult. You want to give me an exception to the rule story about some "AOA Type" that had a tough time with cross-winds in a heavy transport category aircraft? Whatever. I'm sure we can find an RJ guy who struggled with that or something else. I know a few of the one's I've flown with recently could use some remedial radio training. But there's the 5% in every group.

Plenty of "value" in a mix of new hires from various prior walks of aviation life.
I never said that the guy was using 2500 hr RJ guys being hired as a bad thing over a few mil guys. Think what ever you want. Just pointing out the RJ guys and gals are not second tier. When our job becomes air to air combat or low attitude support for ground troops then mil rules but that is not our job. I have trained both mil and civies who had problems with crosswind landings.
HIFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SWAjet
Major
8
01-01-2020 01:25 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
22
06-04-2008 02:16 PM
vagabond
Cargo
15
03-18-2007 04:50 PM
angry tanker
Cargo
91
03-08-2007 09:56 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-05-2005 05:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices