What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?
#741
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
But just so we're clear, you ACTUALLY want bigger airframes at the regional level? You think that's "sick"?
SJS anyone?
#742
This is just my take on it and I could be wrong. If that rumor about United kickin 145's to the curb and bringin in bigger CRJ's is true that will be pretty sick! Hopefully it is true. Get some movement and get the L-Xjet of their high horse. I know that's immature but they are annoying.
#743
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,134
Besides, remember that joke (based on truth) about what Embraer would say when the old XJT management would ask if they'd re-spool up the XR production line?
EMB Rep: "no, but we can get you some great deals on EMB170's or 190's"
#744
The amount of 50 seaters needs to go. But sadly, just like the turboprops, the 50 seat frame will always have it's place. Just not nearly on the scale it has now, the scale that legacy management was able to exploit in the wake of 9/11 and the BK's. After all, you can't run a 737/Airbus, or even a 70 seat airframe into all markets all the time. Or, use it as a supplement to markets that have a 70-90 seat type.
But just so we're clear, you ACTUALLY want bigger airframes at the regional level? You think that's "sick"?
SJS anyone?
But just so we're clear, you ACTUALLY want bigger airframes at the regional level? You think that's "sick"?
SJS anyone?
#745
Not A Janitor
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
However, there are a few points on which Bombardier has the upper hand over Embraer:
- Delivery schedules. Bombardier can get new airframes online much quicker than Embraer right now because of the E190 backlog.
- Training costs. ASA would have to set up a whole new training department for a new aircraft type, eliminating any fleet synergies.
- SKYW relationship with Bombardier and resultant unit cost efficiencies by increasing its CRJ fleet size.
Word at the GO is the ERJs will be exiting as soon as mid-2013 and replaced with the largest CRJ UAL scope will allow. The biggest hurdle right now they said is that Bombardier has reduced production to 2.5 units/month, but can flex that back up to 3.5 to 4 units/month if a large order comes in, allowing for a steady replacement schedule.
They've also tossed around the idea of getting an additional CR7 sim at the ATL training center and trimming down to two CR2 sims, as well as getting a CR7 initial training program (as opposed to CR2 initial + differences) approved due to the volume of CR7/9 training that will be occurring. It all kind of fits into what we've been seeing lately...
#748
As a stagnant CRJ guy, I'd like to see some growth, but not at the expense of the ERJ guys. So ERJs get parked and we get new, big CRJs because we're cheaper and we're getting excited about that? The regional whipsaw game is exactly what's wrong with our segment of the industry, so we take offense when GoJet gets some of "our" flying, but we're more than happy to grow while L-Xjet parks planes?
#750
Not A Janitor
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
But I'd imagine they'd be offered jobs on the CRJ just like their furloughs were right after they were acquired.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post