Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2014, 04:35 PM
  #6861  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS
SkyWest is done with all the engine overhauls on the CRJ200s. So why is the company investing another $20M for CRJ200 engines? My only guess is that they intend to grab some out of the desert and put them back in service. Whether or not they are related to the Delta draw-down is complete conjecture.
They're going to sell them for cargo conversions.
MR JT8D is offline  
Old 08-07-2014, 05:27 PM
  #6862  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
If they told you a bankruptcy was in the works what do you think that would do to the stocks? That is something that is never pre announced
EXACTLY!! Bankruptcy is announced upon filing. No business says, "we might be getting bankrupt. Pilots that think they understand business again.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 08-07-2014, 05:34 PM
  #6863  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Originally Posted by afterburn81
EXACTLY!! Bankruptcy is announced upon filing. No business says, "we might be getting bankrupt. Pilots that think they understand business again.

Yes, and they said they have done their due diligence on this. And there are restructuring people in ATL as well. We went through this once before at xjt. They bring in a hired gun to restructure the company outside bankruptcy. In bankruptcy, management loses a lot of control. Nothing is a slam dunk case. Each stakeholder (vendors, lease holders, unions, etc) are vying for a piece of the Inc pie. The restructuring plan needs to be approved by the creditor'a committee and the judge. It's not solely up to Inc in what the restructuring plan is going to be. American Airlines (and even PNCL) are perfect examples of restructuring plans gone awry. AA ended up being forced into a merger with Airways and PNCL ended up being owned by DAL. This is a huge risk to take when your whole point of bankruptcy protection is to cut costs while having a perfectly viable entity into which to merge into.

Trust me, especially Inc, does NOT want to hand over ANY decisions over to a third party who does not solely have Inc's best interest. Which, coincidentally, is the same reason why they bought xjt when they did rather than to wait and possibly have to deal with a judge and creditors committee.

To me, this was made pretty clear on the call. And it makes sense. They are already restructuring by parking the money losing airplanes. And that's the biggest issue here, not all those costs. The costs are really not that out of line. It's the revenue side from crappy CPAs management signed off on.

Here is what CC said on the call:


"I think we've been very clear that the primary challenge at ExpressJet is not necessarily the cost side. Although there are those issues, but the contract side with some of our major partners, and that's what we're focused on today."

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/sk...ear-2014-08-06

"SkyWest Inc. expects to suffer a full-year loss, though a senior executive said Wednesday that it isn't considering a bankruptcy filing for the ExpressJet unit that has dogged the largest U.S. regional airline's performance for three years."

Last edited by Nevets; 08-07-2014 at 05:38 PM. Reason: additional comments
Nevets is offline  
Old 08-07-2014, 05:54 PM
  #6864  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Yes, and they said they have done their due diligence on this. And there are restructuring people in ATL as well. We went through this once before at xjt. They bring in a hired gun to restructure the company outside bankruptcy. In bankruptcy, management loses a lot of control. Nothing is a slam dunk case. Each stakeholder (vendors, lease holders, unions, etc) are vying for a piece of the Inc pie. The restructuring plan needs to be approved by the creditor'a committee and the judge. It's not solely up to Inc in what the restructuring plan is going to be. American Airlines (and even PNCL) are perfect examples of restructuring plans gone awry. AA ended up being forced into a merger with Airways and PNCL ended up being owned by DAL. This is a huge risk to take when your whole point of bankruptcy protection is to cut costs while having a perfectly viable entity into which to merge into.

Trust me, especially Inc, does NOT want to hand over ANY decisions over to a third party who does not solely have Inc's best interest. Which, coincidentally, is the same reason why they bought xjt when they did rather than to wait and possibly have to deal with a judge and creditors committee.

To me, this was made pretty clear on the call. And it makes sense. They are already restructuring by parking the money losing airplanes. And that's the biggest issue here, not all those costs. The costs are really not that out of line. It's the revenue side from crappy CPAs management signed off on.[

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/sk...ear-2014-08-06

"SkyWest Inc. expects to suffer a full-year loss, though a senior executive said Wednesday that it isn't considering a bankruptcy filing for the ExpressJet unit that has dogged the largest U.S. regional airline's performance for three years."
Lmao, Pinnacle's restructuring plan gone awry??? That thing was executed perfectly by Delta. And it all started when they sold, gave Pinnacle Mesaba. American Airlines situation is more like Skywest Inc. Both have or had a surplus of cash at the time of reorganization. And your wrong about Skywest having less control during a bankruptcy process. Bankruptcy gives them the ability to do almost whatever they want. Reorganizing out side of bankruptcy is more tricky as they are still tied to all existing contracts. I suppose Skywest Inc. could go that route. In any case, I would think it'll become obvious after the summer schedule winds down. I wish you all the best of luck
gojo is offline  
Old 08-07-2014, 08:03 PM
  #6865  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
Lmao, Pinnacle's restructuring plan gone awry??? That thing was executed perfectly by Delta. And it all started when they sold, gave Pinnacle Mesaba. American Airlines situation is more like Skywest Inc. Both have or had a surplus of cash at the time of reorganization. And your wrong about Skywest having less control during a bankruptcy process. Bankruptcy gives them the ability to do almost whatever they want. Reorganizing out side of bankruptcy is more tricky as they are still tied to all existing contracts. I suppose Skywest Inc. could go that route. In any case, I would think it'll become obvious after the summer schedule winds down. I wish you all the best of luck

DAL was forced to buy PNCL or otherwise face the possibility of that bankruptcy turn to chapter 7. That's a risk they were not willing to take. Remember they waited to the very last minute to agree to be the DIP hoping someone else would step up. No one did so they were forced to do it.

And in bankruptcy, the laws are there to protect the creditors first, the owners last. That's why the shareholders usually lose all the value in their stock (ownership). Any creditor can oppose the restructuring plan. The judge rules in what he sees is in the best interest of the creditors and within the scope of bankruptcy laws. The judge decides if contracts can be cancelled or modified if it's in the creditors best interest, again within the confines of bankruptcy laws. Management has to make their case to the judge against those whose are party of any of those contracts or the creditors themselves. Management doesn't just get to do what they want. But when restructuring outside bankruptcy, they don't have a judge they are required to plea their case to and they don't have to worry about any possible vetoes to their restructuring plan. And lastly, it's way more cost efficient to do it that way instead of dealing with the costs to litigate a bankruptcy case. Not to mention the probable harm it would do to the holding company and the stock. Right now, it doesn't seem to be in the best interest of the shareholders. But that's right now only.

Either way, I don't hold my breath for any favorable outcome regardless of bankruptcy.
Nevets is offline  
Old 08-07-2014, 08:13 PM
  #6866  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Squawk87's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: PA34-200
Posts: 145
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
Pilots that think they understand business again.
And you are not a pilot?
Squawk87 is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 04:13 AM
  #6867  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Tony's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,951
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
Some positives? I only heard one positive: no bankruptcy in the works.
Originally Posted by Nevets
Listen to the call. It was alluded that it may harm the holding company. Also, the benefit of bankruptcy protection would be the renegotiation of labor costs. But they admitted that the financial problems with xjt are with the CPAs, not really labor costs. In other words, it's a revenue problem more than anything else. Which is why, other than parking unprofitable aircraft, they are concentrating on operational incentives. They actually lose leverage of trying to renegotiate CPAs in bankruptcy because of the boiler plate bankruptcy clauses in the CPAs.
Nice attempted recovery from your NDA violation.
Captain Tony is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 04:49 AM
  #6868  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 314
Default

You guys really crack me up on here. Really...... When you go down with a few airlines, then you'll get the big picture.

Don't get caught holding the bag! That's all I'm trying to tell you guys..... I hope everyone sold at the 15 to 16 dollar area...... and not STILL holding the bag...
MR JT8D is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 05:21 AM
  #6869  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Default

Originally Posted by MR JT8D
You guys really crack me up on here. Really...... When you go down with a few airlines, then you'll get the big picture.

Don't get caught holding the bag! That's all I'm trying to tell you guys..... I hope everyone sold at the 15 to 16 dollar area...... and not STILL holding the bag...
There is only one way to recover from that fleet.
gzsg is offline  
Old 08-08-2014, 08:56 AM
  #6870  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Nice attempted recovery from your NDA violation.

There you go again acting as if you know what you are talking about.

Let me ask you one question, how many syllables are in the call sign Acey?


Originally Posted by MR JT8D
You guys really crack me up on here. Really...... When you go down with a few airlines, then you'll get the big picture.

Don't get caught holding the bag! That's all I'm trying to tell you guys..... I hope everyone sold at the 15 to 16 dollar area...... and not STILL holding the bag...

Not as big of a problem to go down with your airline if you have a plan b. I wish everyone had one so they can make decisions without fear.

Last edited by Nevets; 08-08-2014 at 08:57 AM. Reason: additonal comments
Nevets is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices