Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2013, 07:35 AM
  #3621  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,316
Default

Uh oh. Someone call Uncle Cracker and urge him to change his name.

I knew what he meant. Geesh.....
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 07-21-2013, 07:39 AM
  #3622  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: FO
Posts: 268
Default

Originally Posted by wmupilot85
This was on the CRJ side. Like I said, this is for the FT/DT rules, which kind of scare me as it seems we are heading for more working days for the same amount of work, instead of making better use of pairings to have the same or more days off.
Ya I hope min day credit is addressed in this possible TA. We need a 5 average min maybe not 5 per day but a trip needs to average 5 to be worth while
Hurryage65 is offline  
Old 07-21-2013, 07:41 AM
  #3623  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: FO
Posts: 268
Default

Say this TA comes out tomorrow, how long to vote and if somehow passed first time how long until it goes into effect!
Hurryage65 is offline  
Old 07-21-2013, 07:55 AM
  #3624  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AnchorDown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 245
Default

Originally Posted by Hurryage65
Say this TA comes out tomorrow, how long to vote and if somehow passed first time how long until it goes into effect!
I SERIOUSLY doubt it will be done today, despite what the email said. Maybe by end of July? Who knows!!!!

If it were to come out, it will have an implementation timeline, prolly a lot will happen Jan 1st, 2014 as far as implementation (my speculation). This gives the company time to program computers, train or whatever they say they're going to do (but don't). Most likely a 2 month voting period which will include road shows in the various bases explaining the new details and why the MeC agreed to what they did, that sort of thing. I'd say late fall by the time it's ratified, all depending on how everyone votes of course.

AnchorDown
AnchorDown is offline  
Old 07-21-2013, 08:48 AM
  #3625  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
Originally Posted by newarkblows
You might want to talk to your union reps once the nondisclosure agreements aren't as important. You have one side of the story and to think that one side was responsible for negotiations breaking down is pretty laughable. There is plenty of blame to go around.
Keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better....

It was your side that wanted to go with an untested new PBS system, over a currently used popular PBS system that has been tested. Incredibly stupid in good times and fatal in this tough negotiating environment.

The blame lies solely on your inexperienced revolving door MEC...
No, our MEC wanted our line bidding. Your MEC wanted flight line. The XJT MEC compromised. The ASA MEC took over a year to move off of their position. If the ASA MEC would have compromised a year ago, we would've ended up with the same deal we have now except it would have been a year ago.

But keep telling yourself otherwise if it makes your ego feel better.

Originally Posted by Hurryage65
Say this TA comes out tomorrow, how long to vote and if somehow passed first time how long until it goes into effect!
They would probably still need to put it into contract language before we see it. That might take a while.
Nevets is offline  
Old 07-21-2013, 09:10 AM
  #3626  
Underpaid...
 
What's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: French-Canadian
Posts: 2,101
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
No, our MEC wanted our line bidding. Your MEC wanted flight line. The XJT MEC compromised. The ASA MEC took over a year to move off of their position. If the ASA MEC would have compromised a year ago, we would've ended up with the same deal we have now except it would have been a year ago.

But keep telling yourself otherwise if it makes your ego feel better.



They would probably still need to put it into contract language before we see it. That might take a while.
All the while other airlines are being forced to take cuts under BK or contract adjustments. I am not there to say who's fault it is but I have a feeling that management is a big part of the reason you boys don't have a contract given the regional airlines struggles. Why didn't ALPA put it up for a vote if this was the biggest issue holding up a contract?
What is offline  
Old 07-21-2013, 10:21 AM
  #3627  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Tony's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,951
Default

Originally Posted by wmupilot85
On a side note, I'll start spinning the rumor mill: I personally asked someone, but I won't name names, about the possibility of a LGA and MSP base. I was told that there is talks right now, and that is a possibility along with a few more bases due to the FT/DT regulations. This will help build better schedules for the company. Now this is confirmed that there is just talks, but no confirmation of what bases, if any, will actually come about.
New bases are being discussed, but I doubt it will be MSP/LGA. The MCI thing on the XJT side was a test. If that works out, look for something like PIT and OKC. Yes, I'm serious. And after the JCBA passes, CRJ will be CRJ., no more 700/200 split. If you're junior, you will be displaced out of ATL.
Captain Tony is offline  
Old 07-21-2013, 10:23 AM
  #3628  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Tony's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,951
Default

Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
The main difference is longer legs. 700/900 won't be affected much, but the Delta 200 is going to suck...We shot ourselves in the foot again with FTDT with the law of unintended consequences.

We keep shooting ourselves in the foot and then we complain because our feet hurt....I wonder if we will ever learn.

If we aren't dual qual. by the first of the year, I'm going to the 700/900, because the 200 schedule will be the new definition of suck...
You answered your own question. It will be "dual qual" and they way the union will sell it is that the new FTDT regs will preclude keeping the 200 split off.
Captain Tony is offline  
Old 07-21-2013, 12:45 PM
  #3629  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 195
Default

I don't understand why they even give us the option to trade for something in open time. It is always denied. Damn thing says it needs 10 reserves, it has 10 reserves and it still denies it. Call scheduling and they say sorry, we can't help you.

Dual qual = no vote for me. That was easy.
ja2c is offline  
Old 07-21-2013, 02:13 PM
  #3630  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 660
Default

I would assume that the dual qual would still generate 200 trips and 700/900 trips correct? Flights attendants throw a wrench in the works. If this is the case, junior people would only be able to hold 200 as senior will scoop up 700/900 out of the pot. Add the new rest rules and it looks like junior means crappy pay and QOL.
JustAnotherPLT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices