What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?
10-22-2012, 06:10 PM
#1131
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 284
Don't be a pawn. That's what they want.
10-22-2012, 07:04 PM
#1132
You scratched my anchor
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,948
Gentlemen. Posts like this are unproductive. We need to come together as a group and work toward a jcba. Don't infight. There is no point. XJET and ASA need to work together, please don't think that management doesn't read these posts.
Don't be a pawn. That's what they want.
Don't be a pawn. That's what they want.
10-22-2012, 07:39 PM
#1133
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: 737
Posts: 144
Welp I'll keep this thread going. Does anyone know the flight times of recent new hires to gauge what is considered competitive?
10-22-2012, 09:19 PM
#1134
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Posts: 389
Gentlemen. Posts like this are unproductive. We need to come together as a group and work toward a jcba. Don't infight. There is no point. XJET and ASA need to work together, please don't think that management doesn't read these posts.
Don't be a pawn. That's what they want.
Don't be a pawn. That's what they want.
10-22-2012, 09:54 PM
#1135
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Posts: 389
I think it probably ranges from 1400-3000 total time in consideration of the new times required for the new FAR's
Last edited by Av8rking; 10-22-2012 at 10:24 PM.
10-23-2012, 04:18 AM
#1137
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: e190
Posts: 929
So I take that as a "no" on the bet.
I'll tell you what boy, mark this page and we shall see. If you look at past posts I would say I am correct 96%, at least, of the time.
As for humility, I think you and your boys should look in the mirror. Also, I would recommend getting the blinders off and look at the road. When things actually take place it means that they where in the works for a long time.
Good luck over the next several months. You're gonna need it!
I'll tell you what boy, mark this page and we shall see. If you look at past posts I would say I am correct 96%, at least, of the time.
As for humility, I think you and your boys should look in the mirror. Also, I would recommend getting the blinders off and look at the road. When things actually take place it means that they where in the works for a long time.
Good luck over the next several months. You're gonna need it!
We are one company right now. What is good for LXJT is good for LASA. You do realize that if xjt loses flying that it will affect LASA. Unfortunately a jcba is pretty far away when both MEC's are being childish and unwilling to negotiate.
10-23-2012, 06:28 AM
#1138
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 285
Are LXJETers at all worried about a United contract? If scope gets relaxed "Expressjet" can convert something like 70 airplanes to larger ones. What type are they likely to be? My guess is CRJ. Seems to me one list would be a big deal to achieve.
10-23-2012, 06:48 AM
#1139
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: EMB145 FO
Posts: 273
I would have thought that any new aircraft are likely to be CRJs purely because that's what L-ASA and SKW operate. The 170/175 would certainly be the preference for many of us at L-XJT as we know and like the Embraer product, but as long as they pay me correctly and on time then I don't care what I fly....sadly they can't do that properly at the moment though!
10-23-2012, 07:33 AM
#1140
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 660
I would say it's of mild concern, but we're not quaking in our boots just yet. We have agreements in place to convert quite a large number of our 50 seaters to 70 seaters if required. With attrition likely to rise dramatically next year and any phase out of the 50 seaters to take at least a couple of years, I wouldn't expect to see any furloughs as a result.
I would have thought that any new aircraft are likely to be CRJs purely because that's what L-ASA and SKW operate. The 170/175 would certainly be the preference for many of us at L-XJT as we know and like the Embraer product, but as long as they pay me correctly and on time then I don't care what I fly....sadly they can't do that properly at the moment though!
I would have thought that any new aircraft are likely to be CRJs purely because that's what L-ASA and SKW operate. The 170/175 would certainly be the preference for many of us at L-XJT as we know and like the Embraer product, but as long as they pay me correctly and on time then I don't care what I fly....sadly they can't do that properly at the moment though!
I honestly don't know, just wondering what would stop the LASA side from getting them?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
