Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy or Republic?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2016, 05:07 AM
  #31  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 13
Default

Originally Posted by lakehouse
This mentality will have you sitting captain on a 175 looking at the first officer in a mainline 737 hired the same time as you 5 years earlier. You both will be captains on those airplanes ten years later. Only one of you will own your companies flying, get 16% of your income into your retirement for free, and not ride the nightmare of fee for departure flying.....


But hey cockpit noise.
Lol, I never mentioned cockpit noise. In fact, I have the chance to do a transition for the 737 for the company I fly for right now (a mainline in South America) and I'm willing to give up on that and even get a big pay cut in order to fly in the US as you guys say, a regional airplane that is basically the same thing as a CRJ or a E145, which I may agree, but right now those are not my priorities (that's why I mentioned it would be better for me but not a must) if I have to do a transition I'm willing to do it, we all have a long career and will be flying lots of different airplanes so who cares. Right now in this particular moment, changing countries, new company, new procedures, new peers and new everything in my life, I'd rather feel somewhat comfortable with what I'm flying at first, what's the big deal anyway, I just asked Envoy or Republic?
Servian is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 07:20 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 231
Default

Republic has shorter upgrade times and no pay cap for FOs.
dl773 is offline  
Old 11-26-2016, 07:26 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 923
Default

Originally Posted by Servian
Lol, I never mentioned cockpit noise. In fact, I have the chance to do a transition for the 737 for the company I fly for right now (a mainline in South America) and I'm willing to give up on that and even get a big pay cut in order to fly in the US as you guys say, a regional airplane that is basically the same thing as a CRJ or a E145, which I may agree, but right now those are not my priorities (that's why I mentioned it would be better for me but not a must) if I have to do a transition I'm willing to do it, we all have a long career and will be flying lots of different airplanes so who cares. Right now in this particular moment, changing countries, new company, new procedures, new peers and new everything in my life, I'd rather feel somewhat comfortable with what I'm flying at first, what's the big deal anyway, I just asked Envoy or Republic?
The big deal is lots of people on here want to jump on other folks' motivations if they don't exactly match a prescribed set of parameters. And the only people who get to set those parameters are the jumpers. Find the regional that best suits your quality of life and basing desires would be my input. If you don't mind early starts/late finishes, some of Republic's outstation bases have lower costs of living. We used to have some of the best pay out there, until the American wholly owned companies bumped their new hire bonuses. $40/hr and $12,500 (current 121) bonus is still a pretty good deal for your first year. End of the day, you probably can't go wrong. I personally think Republic is a better choice but I work here so take it with a grain of salt.
Flightcap is offline  
Old 11-27-2016, 07:24 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 140
Default

Serious question.

How will republic continue to staff the airline, when they offer equal pay minus a flow through.

If they survive it's going to be with a smaller, ever shrinking fleet, and the longest upgrades because of no movement and an inability to attract new hires.

Just my opinion.

Doesn't make sense to me why anyone would go there.
Reservist is offline  
Old 11-27-2016, 08:10 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PleaseComplete's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 371
Default

Originally Posted by Reservist
Serious question.

How will republic continue to staff the airline, when they offer equal pay minus a flow through.

If they survive it's going to be with a smaller, ever shrinking fleet, and the longest upgrades because of no movement and an inability to attract new hires.

Just my opinion.

Doesn't make sense to me why anyone would go there.

Just a wild guess here but in my humble opinion it will be the next XJet. The history looks similar to me in that they bumped the pay way up but have long upgrade times(by today's standards). If they stop bringing people in then the upgrades will slow even more. Recruiters are hanging their hat on "best training and shiniest jets" - just go to an interview to see for yourself.

Almost everything they hope to do in the future hangs on a wing and a prayer. Waiting on AA to sign this contract while meanwhile AA is throwing big money to build up their wholly owned. I think (again just a humble opinion) if AA is able to staff their wholly owned they are not going to sign these deals Republic is banking on. With the money AA is throwing out via their WO they are going to be hard pressed to compete. Also, if you look at the Republic thread, United isn't given them as many aircraft as they were originally going to(I think if I understood correctly).

Then factor in that the same ****ty management that drove them into a "coffin corner" of bankruptcy is the only way out is the same management still driving the bus. Just read through the Republic threads, pilots in general do not seem to like the management at all. You don't just break your contracts and write new ones and it expect it to be all hunky dory. That's like winning an argument with your wife. If you don't believe that fosters ill will that will be long remembered I got a bridge for sale....

After all those considerations, their lines aren't that good and their outstations suck even worse. If you take Miami out of the equation I don't think anyone would go there unless they happened to already live in base.

Add in they are a Teamster union - seems to be 50/50 on how people feel about that.

So yea, my opinion totally agrees with your opinion - I don't know why anyone would go there.
PleaseComplete is offline  
Old 11-27-2016, 08:11 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 690
Default

Originally Posted by Reservist
Serious question.

How will republic continue to staff the airline, when they offer equal pay minus a flow through.

If they survive it's going to be with a smaller, ever shrinking fleet, and the longest upgrades because of no movement and an inability to attract new hires.

Just my opinion.

Doesn't make sense to me why anyone would go there.
What makes you say the fleet will shrink? RAH has deliveries coming. And guys are leaving at a rate comparable to what flows are supposed to do, but with more variety rather than people going to 1 company.
knewyork is offline  
Old 11-27-2016, 08:45 AM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 97
Default

What say ye to those who say unless you are military or at a WO, you will never go to AA mainline?
slinger is offline  
Old 11-27-2016, 08:58 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PleaseComplete's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 371
Default

Originally Posted by slinger
What say ye to those who say unless you are military or at a WO, you will never go to AA mainline?
I'd say that's untrue.

There are obviously pilots at Republic that are happy and pilots that went to Republic that have went on to work at all the major and lcc airlines, including AA.
PleaseComplete is offline  
Old 11-27-2016, 12:56 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 231
Default

Originally Posted by Reservist
Serious question.

How will republic continue to staff the airline, when they offer equal pay minus a flow through.

If they survive it's going to be with a smaller, ever shrinking fleet, and the longest upgrades because of no movement and an inability to attract new hires.

Just my opinion.

Doesn't make sense to me why anyone would go there.
As if a flow is the end all be all for staffing, and nobody can staff without a flow. . . and that's a serious question?

SkyWest can staff without a flow AND less pay.
dl773 is offline  
Old 11-27-2016, 02:30 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Position: C172 Captain
Posts: 643
Default

Originally Posted by Reservist
Serious question.

How will republic continue to staff the airline, when they offer equal pay minus a flow through.

If they survive it's going to be with a smaller, ever shrinking fleet, and the longest upgrades because of no movement and an inability to attract new hires.

Just my opinion.

Doesn't make sense to me why anyone would go there.
With a ton of 50-seaters still, you really think Envoy's not going to shrink in the future?
KCaviator is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DFWEMB
Envoy Airlines
48
02-03-2014 10:52 AM
CANAM
Frontier
206
06-27-2009 12:47 AM
Frisky Pilot
Regional
0
06-23-2005 03:50 PM
Frisky Pilot
Major
0
06-23-2005 03:46 PM
Gordon C
Regional
0
04-21-2005 07:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices