Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy or PDT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2016, 01:49 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 755
Default

Originally Posted by GodIsGood
Keep in mind that if AAG wants more 175's, they have to give Envoy 90 more before giving any additional 175's to anyone else. That's contractual.
Scope won't allow for 90 new airframes unless they cut more from another carrier. Envoy will likely get more airplanes, but they will be from another carrier.
PSA help is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 04:09 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 344
Default

At this time scope would alow for ~30-35 more large rjs.

If American exercises any of the 90 options they own they must come to envoy.

It is possible pdt could get planes from republic, but they just signed updated capacity purchase agreements with all 3 major cariers, and they own there own planes.
RawHide is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 04:49 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 453
Default

I live in DFW. Would commuting to Piedmont for better schedules and faster upgrade make more sense?
mojo6911 is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 05:16 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by mojo6911
I live in DFW. Would commuting to Piedmont for better schedules and faster upgrade make more sense?
If you're older in class you could get the E175 and be DFW based from the start. If not wait the 6-9 months it'll take to transfer to DFW on the E145. Drive to work, especially if the alternative is an east coast commute possibly to an outstation that doesn't even have direct flights.
go skers is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 05:32 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,961
Default

Originally Posted by mojo6911
I live in DFW. Would commuting to Piedmont for better schedules and faster upgrade make more sense?
I personally wouldn't commute to a WO regional when you live in the base of another one. Get in line for the flow and apply everywhere else. PDTs flow isn't that much better than envoys (approx 4-5 years vs 6-8 years) to legitimize a commute and QOL hit for that long.
Otterbox is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 05:39 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 453
Default

Originally Posted by go skers
If you're older in class you could get the E175 and be DFW based from the start. If not wait the 6-9 months it'll take to transfer to DFW on the E145. Drive to work, especially if the alternative is an east coast commute possibly to an outstation that doesn't even have direct flights.
I'm 33, so probably have a decent shot at the 175 for envoy. How realistic is their 2.5 year upgrade protection?
mojo6911 is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 06:30 AM
  #67  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 761
Default

Originally Posted by mojo6911
I live in DFW. Would commuting to Piedmont for better schedules and faster upgrade make more sense?
Depends how much you value a faster flow and immediate upgrade compared to how much you value not having a commute. Some guys don't mind that commute, and would rather take the faster upgrade. Other people want to be home as much as possible and will sacrifice the upgrade time and flow time. Totally depends on your mentality, but I wouldn't say you're going wrong choosing either.

Keep in mind that at PDT your base will be PHL, not an outstation as some have suggested. All the jets are based in Philly
MantisToboggan is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 06:59 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by mojo6911
I'm 33, so probably have a decent shot at the 175 for envoy. How realistic is their 2.5 year upgrade protection?
With 50+ new hires per month materializing and topside attrition continuing the upgrade time is realistic.

Not sure about your current circumstances but if you have zero 121 time it'll take you close to two years anyway to get the required time to upgrade
go skers is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 07:08 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 453
Default

Originally Posted by go skers
With 50+ new hires per month materializing and topside attrition continuing the upgrade time is realistic.

Not sure about your current circumstances but if you have zero 121 time it'll take you close to two years anyway to get the required time to upgrade
I only have roughly 200 hours of time that counts towards the PIC requirements, so 800 hours. I should be able to get that in a year and a half, right?

It seems like there's a lot of 4/2 schedules at Envoy, so quality of life seems about the same.
mojo6911 is offline  
Old 12-08-2016, 07:14 AM
  #70  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by Otterbox
I personally wouldn't commute to a WO regional when you live in the base of another one. Get in line for the flow and apply everywhere else. PDTs flow isn't that much better than envoys (approx 4-5 years vs 6-8 years) to legitimize a commute and QOL hit for that long.
So Piedmont's flow is faster than Envoy's??
Gman007 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jland0413
Envoy Airlines
31
08-27-2016 07:03 PM
SpreadEagle
Envoy Airlines
65
05-25-2016 01:53 PM
Romulus
Envoy Airlines
15
10-14-2014 06:34 PM
Crawl
Envoy Airlines
553
10-09-2014 10:36 AM
AllisonRR
Envoy Airlines
45
10-07-2014 05:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices