Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Envoy Airlines
Envoy closes 3 bases in 3 years. 2 left! >

Envoy closes 3 bases in 3 years. 2 left!

Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy closes 3 bases in 3 years. 2 left!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2015, 06:16 AM
  #31  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
Endeavor (Pinnacolaba) Let's see, off the top of my head, Pinnacle, MEM, MSP, DTW, ATL, JFK.... Mesaba, MSP, DTW, CVG, MEM, LGA ( CWA, RHI, years back) Colgan, IAH, EWR, IAD, BOS, CRW, ALB, and the pile of outstation bases I can't remember..... Today, MSP, DTW, JFK/LGA.... over 3000 pilots, now 1500, down to 110ish planes and still dropping... We feel your pain. At least we might have hit bottom finally here
Never was a part of those airlines so my history isnt that good, but they had bases in RHI and CWA? While I actually have family that live near RHI, not exactly the most populous area. I guess that is why they are not bases anymore. Hell, some of the eagles that formed the "American Eagle Airlines" had a base in MQT and FNT plus plenty others I'm sure.
snippercr is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 06:25 AM
  #32  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 787
Default

Originally Posted by Ex lurker
Since before the PSA (or envoy) pilot votes AAGs goal was for PSA to be the operator of the Bombardier products and envoy to be the operator of the Embraer products. That goal hasn't changed.

There is a target number of envoy pilots and that number is close to being hit. If attrition carries envoy below that number there is a group of pilots that could be brought in that would bolster the numbers.
Interesting analysis, and one that I agree with. Only thing I'm not 100% sold on is a merger. I assume you mean Envoy merging with Piedmont. But that would reduce the company's ability to whipsaw.

But I agree that there is a long term plan for Envoy which involves us being the E-175 operator. In fact, AA said as much in their last meeting with Envoy. But first there is a size they need to get us down to.
Skyvector is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 11:24 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,014
Default

Originally Posted by PSASUX
You must be high on crack. No way are we getting 175's at PSA. We cannot even staff what we have, much less the other 900's we are supposed to get. But you keep drinking that company kool aid.
Ex comair buddy says couple of psa big wigs over at CVG flight safety checking out the E175 sim.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 11:35 AM
  #34  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011
Ex comair buddy says couple of psa big wigs over at CVG flight safety checking out the E175 sim.
Do you hear that? It's like the sound of a collective boner being popped as PSA pukes salivate at the prospect of getting more airplanes from Envoy.
snippercr is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 11:38 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,014
Default

Originally Posted by snippercr
Do you hear that? It's like the sound of a collective boner being popped as PSA pukes salivate at the prospect of getting more airplanes from Envoy.
I don't work there. It probably means nothing so don't get all excited.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 11:49 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by Skyvector
Interesting analysis, and one that I agree with. Only thing I'm not 100% sold on is a merger. I assume you mean Envoy merging with Piedmont. But that would reduce the company's ability to whipsaw.

But I agree that there is a long term plan for Envoy which involves us being the E-175 operator. In fact, AA said as much in their last meeting with Envoy. But first there is a size they need to get us down to.
What if they consolidate all of the flying onto one certificate (PSA), and then keep all the ground handling in a separate company (Envoy). This would not facilitate the whipsaw, but may help them lower costs by running only 1 certificate versus 3. Who knows. Who cares.
air101 is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 11:58 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

Originally Posted by Ex lurker
Since before the PSA (or envoy) pilot votes AAGs goal was for PSA to be the operator of the Bombardier products and envoy to be the operator of the Embraer products. That goal hasn't changed.

There is a target number of envoy pilots and that number is close to being hit. If attrition carries envoy below that number there is a group of pilots that could be brought in that would bolster the numbers.
just from curiosity, what group of pilots would be brought in to bolster?
buddies8 is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 03:28 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 787
Default

Originally Posted by buddies8
just from curiosity, what group of pilots would be brought in to bolster?
Who do you think? Starts with a P, doesn't end in an A...and will soon be operating ERJ-145s for AA. Keep in mind the long term goal: Envoy as the Embraer operator for AA.
Skyvector is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 03:37 PM
  #39  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

Originally Posted by Skyvector
Who do you think? Starts with a P, doesn't end in an A...and will soon be operating ERJ-145s for AA. Keep in mind the long term goal: Envoy as the Embraer operator for AA.
Merge one super senior pilot group with another? Don't think so. I see an "asset" transfer. Grow PDT similar to how they grew PSA. Keep moving Envoy aircraft to PDT and have their upgrade time artificially drop. Now you have a bunch of upgrading captains who are going to be at a pay grade lower than captains at Envoy. Keep doing this and route all new-applicants (by their own choice) to PDT. Get Envoy to a manageable size and shut it down, ridding themselves of the gummers.
snippercr is offline  
Old 03-18-2015, 09:57 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by snippercr
Merge one super senior pilot group with another? Don't think so. I see an "asset" transfer. Grow PDT similar to how they grew PSA. Keep moving Envoy aircraft to PDT and have their upgrade time artificially drop. Now you have a bunch of upgrading captains who are going to be at a pay grade lower than captains at Envoy. Keep doing this and route all new-applicants (by their own choice) to PDT. Get Envoy to a manageable size and shut it down, ridding themselves of the gummers.
I think you overestimate the importance of getting rid of the "gummers".
Ex lurker is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
somedayillcare
Envoy Airlines
1
12-10-2014 02:30 AM
fr8rcaptain
Major
5
01-18-2007 07:17 AM
Sir James
Major
36
06-05-2006 12:53 PM
captain_drew
Hangar Talk
2
04-14-2006 04:46 PM
Tech Maven
Pilot Health
2
01-01-2006 03:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices