Don't come to Envoy until lines improve!
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,311
First of all I'm not sure who Sam is. You can call me that if you want though. It's a good strong Christian name.
Anyway, we don't need any more 175s thank you very much. We have enough on our plates. I have always said (look back at my previous posts to prove it) that "Eagle" should get them. So you're wrong there. No admiration whatsoever of your crap sandwich over at Envoy.
You know who else doesn't pay for a good portion of training hotels? Delta! Alaska Airlines also doesn't pay for hotels. I'm sure there are others. Compass should get their act together and start paying though. I feel terrible for the new hires.
Anyway, we don't need any more 175s thank you very much. We have enough on our plates. I have always said (look back at my previous posts to prove it) that "Eagle" should get them. So you're wrong there. No admiration whatsoever of your crap sandwich over at Envoy.
You know who else doesn't pay for a good portion of training hotels? Delta! Alaska Airlines also doesn't pay for hotels. I'm sure there are others. Compass should get their act together and start paying though. I feel terrible for the new hires.
#32
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
It would seem that it's more attractive to let Envoy wither on the vine though as they have several hundred senior captains with no plans to go anywhere and I can't see Parker paying them their present big bucks when he doesn't have to. Think about this; If Envoy shrinks to say 1000 pilots, 500 will be captains and most, if not all will be topped out at 18 year scale.
I don't see that as being competitive and didn't Parker just demand and get concessions claiming that as the very reason ? I think he's just kicking the can (his specialty) until Envoy is small enough to dissolve. In the interim, he's just trimming costs as much as possible without beating the bushes to scare off the snakes too fast. Doesn't sound like the last part of that is working and so they're going to have to react sooner rather then later and that's not likely to be pretty or good for present Envoy pilots. For some reason, the vision of a piñata comes to mind...........
Last edited by eaglefly; 01-20-2015 at 08:23 AM.
#33
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
It will eventually but just not in any of our time here at eagle. While a lot of people claim management only looks at THIS quarter, this whole agreement process has showed that they really have a long term plan they want to work on. It's not a SPECIFIC plan like 117 airplanes at this carrier, 54 airplanes at the other carrier, etc but more a generic plan and strategy.
There is no movement at eagle because as we shrink we are flowing and attriting people from all ranks while not hiring YET havent furloughed anyone.
Once we reach the size they want us to (68 145s + 40 175s = 108 or ~1500 pilots) the flow will finally cause movement and lower upgrade time, especially as growth at other carriers stops (PSA namely) they will stop acting as a pilot magnet. This has been the plan all along to have envoy act as the direct entry method to AA all the way from cradle to grave - you sign up as a pipeline instructor, you instruct, go to envoy, go to AA. All on 1 interview.
Again, this is not a 6 month plan - this is the 10 year plan so no, no one here will ever see a "fast" upgrade so I guess my entire point is moot.
There is no movement at eagle because as we shrink we are flowing and attriting people from all ranks while not hiring YET havent furloughed anyone.
Once we reach the size they want us to (68 145s + 40 175s = 108 or ~1500 pilots) the flow will finally cause movement and lower upgrade time, especially as growth at other carriers stops (PSA namely) they will stop acting as a pilot magnet. This has been the plan all along to have envoy act as the direct entry method to AA all the way from cradle to grave - you sign up as a pipeline instructor, you instruct, go to envoy, go to AA. All on 1 interview.
Again, this is not a 6 month plan - this is the 10 year plan so no, no one here will ever see a "fast" upgrade so I guess my entire point is moot.
There simply aren't that number in the new-hire pipeline and you can forget about poaching other regionals to any meaningful degree. No, I foresee the inability to stem the shrinking pilot loss equation at the numbers they may want and thus as the pilot group shrinks too fast and too early, they'll have to react and there will be few good options then for Envoy pilots at least. They'll hit whatever number, but then despite their efforts the deficit will grow greater each month from the inability to replace lost pilots until they start losing market share and then they will act. There is a likely bright spot of delaying that for them. Here at AA, the flow is likely to slow to a trickle or even stop for awhile as hundreds of deferred furloughees return (there are over 1000) over the next year or so as they get 2 years extra LOS if they commit by mid February pending ratification of the present TA and the combination of divisions along with PBS requires as many as 1500 (or more) less pilots to fly the present schedule (no expansion slated till at least 2018) and it all evens out at the rate of retirements. The bottom line, AA may need very few pilots from either the street or flow thru for many months, perhaps even 18 due to furlough returns and scheduling efficiencies mitigating retirements until it balances and that could be awhile. That would be 20 less list to AA each month, but would likely only result in more aggressive outside attrition as impatient Envoy pilots take a better deal elsewhere as at least it's something real as opposed to a hypothetical promise from ethically bankrupt managers and executives with a long history of making promises only to break them later.
Good luck with your hopes for Envoy, but ultimately I see a major haircut, especially with so many 18-year $120,000/year hippies.
#34
I have to disagree with this and see it as wishful thinking. It's predicated on the assumption that at some magical point management will be able to match attrition with attraction. Whatever the number, attrition us only likely to remain constant, if not even increase. Can Envoy at whatever point say at 1500 pilots, suddenly attract and graduate 60/month ?
There simply aren't that number in the new-hire pipeline and you can forget about poaching other regionals to any meaningful degree. No, I foresee the inability to stem the shrinking pilot loss equation at the numbers they may want and thus as the pilot group shrinks too fast and too early, they'll have to react and there will be few good options then for Envoy pilots at least. They'll hit whatever number, but the deficit will grow greater each month from the inability to replace lost pilots until they start losing market share. There is a likely bright spot of delaying that for them. Here at AA, the flow is likely to slow to a trickle or even stop for awhile as hundreds of deferred furloughees return (there are over 1000) over the next year or so as they get 2 years extra LOS if they commit by mid February pending ratification of the present TA and the combination of divisions along with PBS requires as many as 1500 (or more) pilots to fly the present schedule (no expansion slated till at least 2018) and it all even out at the rate of retirements. The bottom line, AA may need very few pilots from either the street or flow thru for many months, perhaps even 18.
Good luck with your hopes for Envoy, but ultimately I see a major haircut, especially with so many 18-year $120,000/year hippies.
There simply aren't that number in the new-hire pipeline and you can forget about poaching other regionals to any meaningful degree. No, I foresee the inability to stem the shrinking pilot loss equation at the numbers they may want and thus as the pilot group shrinks too fast and too early, they'll have to react and there will be few good options then for Envoy pilots at least. They'll hit whatever number, but the deficit will grow greater each month from the inability to replace lost pilots until they start losing market share. There is a likely bright spot of delaying that for them. Here at AA, the flow is likely to slow to a trickle or even stop for awhile as hundreds of deferred furloughees return (there are over 1000) over the next year or so as they get 2 years extra LOS if they commit by mid February pending ratification of the present TA and the combination of divisions along with PBS requires as many as 1500 (or more) pilots to fly the present schedule (no expansion slated till at least 2018) and it all even out at the rate of retirements. The bottom line, AA may need very few pilots from either the street or flow thru for many months, perhaps even 18.
Good luck with your hopes for Envoy, but ultimately I see a major haircut, especially with so many 18-year $120,000/year hippies.
Good luck
#35
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
The "good luck" part is weird, I agree and even more so because it's most frequently offered by a certain senior Envoy pilot........in reality, to himself.
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 611
Envoy's new contract is truly one of the worst. They do have solid reserve rules, but when half the airline is on reserve, you need them. Pretty much no soft pay, no min day, only trip guarantee. Allows the company to fly you ACT-DFW-ABI and pay you less than 2 hours, when almost every other regional around would be making at least 3.5 for the day because of min day pay. So instead of having lines that block 72-75 and credit into the mid 80s, you're left with crediting whatever you block. That's awful.
Everyone at envoy was so blinded by the pay scale cuts that they didn't even think about trying to get some money makers in the contract. A 4 hour min day pay, SAP, or some type of trip rig would have helped the terrible schedules.
(Also, you guys might want to look into what was actually going on with your NYC CA rep during the last round of negotiations.)
Last edited by Ar Pilot; 01-20-2015 at 08:59 AM.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: Feito no Brasil, CA
Posts: 833
Let's clear that up. This is a payout for the amendment round bonus we would have already gotten. People are calling it a bribe or a signing bonus, it's not either of those. If people here think it's a bonus for signing, they're not too bright, especially if they thought it was a good reason to sign for.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Just another RJ guy
Posts: 906
You might be referring to Endeavor? They get $15k in Sept 2015 then another $15k a year later. Is that what you're referring to?
I sense a little bit of resentment in your post. It's ok, one day you will make it to greener pastures.
It's funny how quickly this became a CP bashing contest when I didn't even mentioned CP. A select few who have it out for CP started this. I was just talking about how crappy the Envoy guys have it since they now, by their choosing, have voted in a second concessionary contract. The first concessionary contract was justifiable since they were in bankruptcy. Adios dude was trying to paint a rose picture about a polished turd so I was reminding him how a turd is still a turd.
#40
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Let's clear that up. This is a payout for the amendment round bonus we would have already gotten. People are calling it a bribe or a signing bonus, it's not either of those. If people here think it's a bonus for signing, they're not too bright, especially if they thought it was a good reason to sign for.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post