Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

More great news at Envoy!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2014, 03:40 PM
  #411  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 84
Default More great news at Envoy!

Was wondering if anyone could give me a total pilot count at Envoy, feel like this website is outdated. Thanks in advance
DaCowboys is offline  
Old 09-24-2014, 05:01 PM
  #412  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

2500.......
buddies8 is offline  
Old 09-25-2014, 10:22 AM
  #413  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Square root of the variance and average of the variation
Posts: 1,602
Default

Number 2490-something reporting for duty...
Std Deviation is offline  
Old 09-25-2014, 11:53 AM
  #414  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

Stay home not worth coming in. Place is falling apart everywhere. The new PSA and PDT office and training center in Euless Texas is up and running just waiting for the low ballers to move in.
buddies8 is offline  
Old 09-25-2014, 12:41 PM
  #415  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 31
Default Sure they would.

Originally Posted by wiz5422
Again this explains why you all just don't get the big picture and why you all threw away the industry. There is value in wholly owned, they would never place all their flying with contact carriers. So your scenario holds no ground. Keep convincing yourself why you voted yes and sold your career for a few shiny jets.
Sure they would. Look at Delta. They closed Comair and Sold ASA. None of their regional flying was wholly owned until they VERY RECENTLY (in the grand time frame) bought what is now Endeavor OUT OF BANKRUPTCY.

You are crazy to think they won't put the flying at the lowest cost carrier that can reliably do the flying. And not only do the regional carrier pilot really have no say, the regional managements have little or no say.

And now you are seeing the regional flying overall SHRINKING and mainline flying INCREASING and CEOs stating that is their future intention. Sorry, but you are simply WRONG!
JetPilotMan is offline  
Old 09-25-2014, 01:30 PM
  #416  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 31
Default Why haven't we seen a NEW regional?

I've been around this industry for more than 15 years. I'm not the "oldest of timers" but I'm not a newbie either. I've seen close-hand Comair shutdown. I've seen the growth in the early 2000s and the stagnation... I've seen the "new" regional airlines...the true start ups...

So, here's a question for everyone to ponder -

IF the market is so good for the regionals (they can whipsaw, 12/4 pay caps, and lots of pilots around) [all of which are actually imho the last gasp of a dying segment of the industry]

and SINCE the market and Mainline at ALL TIME HIGHS for profit taking (stock market peaked at over 17000---highest ever; huge profits at the now consolidated Majors AND LCCs like Spirit and Allegiant are #2-3)

THEN - why no truly NEW startup regionals?
Why ONLY the whipsaw...

Just food for thought... Hey, if the mainlines really think they can low-ball forever...why aren't we seeing NEW carriers. Like the next-generation SkyWest with no union? Just wondering. Mainlines are upgrading their fleets, reducing debt, ... LCCs are growing rapidly to fill a void ... but the regional flying is shrinking. If the resources (pilots at low pay) are really there...why nothing truly new?

I have my thoughts...but I thought I'd throw it out there...just for fun!

Say I'm Richard Anderson or Parker...why not say, 100% of you will flow, we'll do it fast, you're the new (and only) pipeline, we'll make it only you, etc....

The closest we've really come is Endeavor and that, from what I understand, isn't working (at least the EtoD...)...
JetPilotMan is offline  
Old 09-25-2014, 06:15 PM
  #417  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by JetPilotMan
I've been around this industry for more than 15 years. I'm not the "oldest of timers" but I'm not a newbie either. I've seen close-hand Comair shutdown. I've seen the growth in the early 2000s and the stagnation... I've seen the "new" regional airlines...the true start ups...

So, here's a question for everyone to ponder -

IF the market is so good for the regionals (they can whipsaw, 12/4 pay caps, and lots of pilots around) [all of which are actually imho the last gasp of a dying segment of the industry]

and SINCE the market and Mainline at ALL TIME HIGHS for profit taking (stock market peaked at over 17000---highest ever; huge profits at the now consolidated Majors AND LCCs like Spirit and Allegiant are #2-3)

THEN - why no truly NEW startup regionals?
Why ONLY the whipsaw...

Just food for thought... Hey, if the mainlines really think they can low-ball forever...why aren't we seeing NEW carriers. Like the next-generation SkyWest with no union? Just wondering. Mainlines are upgrading their fleets, reducing debt, ... LCCs are growing rapidly to fill a void ... but the regional flying is shrinking. If the resources (pilots at low pay) are really there...why nothing truly new?

I have my thoughts...but I thought I'd throw it out there...just for fun!

Say I'm Richard Anderson or Parker...why not say, 100% of you will flow, we'll do it fast, you're the new (and only) pipeline, we'll make it only you, etc....

The closest we've really come is Endeavor and that, from what I understand, isn't working (at least the EtoD...)...
Better question , if nobody is going to be at the regionals in 8 years, why is the 12/4 payscale so non negotiable?

Oh that's right. Scott Krby just told the APA pilots at the ORD meeting they will offer delta rates + 3% but they want scope relief (89 seats for regionals) in return
jdflyer1999 is offline  
Old 09-25-2014, 06:20 PM
  #418  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: forever fo
Posts: 2,413
Default

Originally Posted by jdflyer1999
Better question , if nobody is going to be at the regionals in 8 years, why is the 12/4 payscale so non negotiable?

Oh that's right. Scott Krby just told the APA pilots at the ORD meeting they will offer delta rates + 3% but they want scope relief (89 seats for regionals) in return
I hope as this new generation of pilots moves in over the next few years, they remember how important scope is and never ever ever give it up again.
lakehouse is offline  
Old 09-25-2014, 06:30 PM
  #419  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,014
Default

It's more likely that the regionals will become the new majors. They already know regional pilots will do anything so there is no incentive to do you any favors at the majors either. Life will be changing there as well as the current crop of regionals start to move over. I don't see today's regional pilots making the kind of money at the majors that todays major pilots make.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 09-25-2014, 06:52 PM
  #420  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by JetPilotMan
I've been around this industry for more than 15 years. I'm not the "oldest of timers" but I'm not a newbie either. I've seen close-hand Comair shutdown. I've seen the growth in the early 2000s and the stagnation... I've seen the "new" regional airlines...the true start ups...

So, here's a question for everyone to ponder -

IF the market is so good for the regionals (they can whipsaw, 12/4 pay caps, and lots of pilots around) [all of which are actually imho the last gasp of a dying segment of the industry]

and SINCE the market and Mainline at ALL TIME HIGHS for profit taking (stock market peaked at over 17000---highest ever; huge profits at the now consolidated Majors AND LCCs like Spirit and Allegiant are #2-3)

THEN - why no truly NEW startup regionals?
Why ONLY the whipsaw...

Just food for thought... Hey, if the mainlines really think they can low-ball forever...why aren't we seeing NEW carriers. Like the next-generation SkyWest with no union? Just wondering. Mainlines are upgrading their fleets, reducing debt, ... LCCs are growing rapidly to fill a void ... but the regional flying is shrinking. If the resources (pilots at low pay) are really there...why nothing truly new?

I have my thoughts...but I thought I'd throw it out there...just for fun!

Say I'm Richard Anderson or Parker...why not say, 100% of you will flow, we'll do it fast, you're the new (and only) pipeline, we'll make it only you, etc....

The closest we've really come is Endeavor and that, from what I understand, isn't working (at least the EtoD...)...
Building a start up takes a bunch of cash building the certificate and all that goes with it. Ten years ago, it may have been worth the risk to invest in a start up (there were alter egos that have flourished).

But right now, nobody is sure what the "regional" airline of the future will look like. Time to hunker down, pay a couple percent more for an established carrier, and find out what is going to happen.

Heck, there are airports that are running operations at 100 percent: there can be only so many departures from a given runway. For example, JFK and LGA are pretty close to being maxed out. The odds of building a new airport in NYC are nil. So, if more pax are to be serviced, they must be in larger aircraft. The death of (or at least the limiting) of regionals may end up being airport capacity.

Or to put it another way, why are there articulated buses? Because either the roadway won't accommodate two buses or it is cheaper to run one big bus, even if the driver is paid more, than running two buses.
FlyJSH is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KnightFlyer
Cargo
18
02-05-2014 07:32 PM
ACEFLYERSWA
Major
62
02-23-2009 03:04 PM
JNYVEGAS
Cargo
34
01-30-2009 09:21 PM
FlyingPirate
Regional
74
01-15-2009 03:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices