Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

More great news at Envoy!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2014, 03:08 PM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 781
Default

You're preaching to the choir my friend. And I've been flying for 15 years so I'm not really a newbie. I'm at least an intermediate by now I would hope. How long have you been flying? funny how the loudest ones are 1-2 year FOs and flight attendants. Not talking about you but just in general.

39% of us took the stand with you! It would've been shot down had AA not said Mesa would get the 900s if we vote it down. Forget bankruptcy pressure, are you guys not feeling the record profit pressure? I'm not trying to be funny. AA has more power now that they're making record profit. A lot of it has to do with the fake bankruptcy and power to whipsaw not just 3 wholly owned but along with 8 other regionals that flies for the new AA. You can't make excuse for AE taking concessions during bankruptcy, just like Endeavor shouldn't make excuses for their concessions during their bankruptcy and neither should PSA. The threat to shut down PSA is even more real in our recent vote than what Eagle had to vote on during bankruptcy. AE was the main and pretty much only game in town and AA had billions in the bank. And like I've said before, if PSA had furlough protection, it would've been an easy no for us too. Pay attention to PDT's vote. They're in worse position than PSA was, you try convincing them that shutdown is not real for their 350 pilots.
skyxbomb is offline  
Old 09-08-2014, 03:11 PM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 781
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
You're saying PSA has captains making $150K, really love to see proof of that....
You guys are as good at making up B/S excuses(for your pathetic actions), as you are at selling out the crews that actually tried to take a stand against managements constant attacks against pay and benefits in our already far underpaid segment of the "profession"!
My buddy who is just senior to me bypassed the upgrade for months now because he doesn't want to take the pay cut. I've finally got to fly with him last month, I told him there's noway he's taking a pay cut by upgrading. He showed me his pay stubs and he was making 1k more than me a month. I think in July he credited 150 something hours with 11 days off. Flew about 90. Another buddy who holds the company record just north of 200 credit for the month. He's a junior captain and probably made just as much as mainline captain that month if not more. Saw him few weeks ago and I asked are you going for a new record? He laughed and said no I'm around 150 credit hours this month. What other regional can one do that? But I guess it's better if we vote no and let the planes goto Mesa like they would've. I'm sure Mesa FOs can make more than my PSA captain salary if they want. Maybe growing PSA isn't that bad for the industry because no other regionals would even think about giving their pilots sap and critical pay like the ones we have. But yea they want you to cap out at 12/4 like PSA and our crappy contract.
skyxbomb is offline  
Old 09-08-2014, 03:31 PM
  #163  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 56
Default

What makes me irate is when I hear PSA guys talk about how much credits they make. Listen I am happy that you guys are doing well but the benefit of being able to drop and then pick up trips only will last as long as you all are short staff. I am happy that things are looking good for you guys but no one knows what the future holds and things can quickly change. If it were not for the 2 pilots recovering after stalling out both engines in the climb a couple of months ago PSA might be an after thought and instead of gloating about how well things are going you might be sending messages out trying to find jobs at different airlines.
Coolbeans is offline  
Old 09-08-2014, 03:35 PM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Default

Originally Posted by skyxbomb
You're preaching to the choir my friend. And I've been flying for 15 years so I'm not really a newbie. I'm at least an intermediate by now I would hope. How long have you been flying? funny how the loudest ones are 1-2 year FOs and flight attendants. Not talking about you but just in general.

39% of us took the stand with you! It would've been shot down had AA not said Mesa would get the 900s if we vote it down. Forget bankruptcy pressure, are you guys not feeling the record profit pressure? I'm not trying to be funny. AA has more power now that they're making record profit. A lot of it has to do with the fake bankruptcy and power to whipsaw not just 3 wholly owned but along with 8 other regionals that flies for the new AA. You can't make excuse for AE taking concessions during bankruptcy, just like Endeavor shouldn't make excuses for their concessions during their bankruptcy and neither should PSA. The threat to shut down PSA is even more real in our recent vote than what Eagle had to vote on during bankruptcy. AE was the main and pretty much only game in town and AA had billions in the bank. And like I've said before, if PSA had furlough protection, it would've been an easy no for us too. Pay attention to PDT's vote. They're in worse position than PSA was, you try convincing them that shutdown is not real for their 350 pilots.

I started flying in H.S., and have flown professionally(getting paid)since my last 2 years of college which was a lot more than 15 years ago(thanks for asking).
Look, I've said it before, I don't work for Envoy. However, I have a lot of friends that were former Wings West, that became Eagle and now Envoy that I really feel for! I don't have all the answers, but I do know one thing for certain!!!
Never trust management! How can you and others keep buying into everything they say while trying to get you to agree to the concessions they claimed to need? You claim "it would've been shot down had AA not said Mesa would get the 900's".
You don't think they would tell you whatever it took to get what they wanted?? You really think a company that is already staffing by doing phone interviews(aka Hi, what class date would you like), could even possibly staff anymore A/C???
Does management ever come to a pilot group when asking for concessions and say: Hey, we're making all time record profits, but we need the pilot group to take pay cuts(so we can get bigger bonuses and pay increases).
I truly believe with the age 65, 117, and 121 ATP requirement, we finally had a shot at not going backwards anymore. You know, the whole united we stand divided we fall thing???

P.S.
I've listened to all the arguments from your group on why that wouldn't work and just don't buy it.
They couldn't give all the flying to Mesa, even if they wanted to(no way they could grow any faster than currently trying).
Compass really couldn't take much more than what they already got(its just not possible to grow much faster, especially while they're still losing guys from former flow through).
Every other non-owned is more expensive so Parker wouldn't save money over Envoy.
Paid2fly is offline  
Old 09-08-2014, 03:41 PM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 781
Default

Sorry you took it as gloating. Every one of these responses is due to someone else saying PSA has a horrible contract and we took concessions as you can see from the quote I've included in my response. The fact is PSA pilots make top regional dollars. Might not be something to stop the press but it sure as heck debunks all these senseless claims about PSA lowering the industry standard when we're probably leading monetary and QOL wise. If someone wants to hate PSA for being stuck between a rock and a hard place and chose to survive then it's completely understandable. But don't hate PSA saying we have crap contract or pay like the recent XJT MEC letter that ridicules our first year FO pay when XJT first year pay is even lower.
skyxbomb is offline  
Old 09-08-2014, 03:43 PM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 781
Default

Hey paid2fly, I guess we have to agree to agree. I think we're both on the same page and that's why many of us voted no.
skyxbomb is offline  
Old 09-08-2014, 05:01 PM
  #167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by Coolbeans
What makes me irate is when I hear PSA guys talk about how much credits they make. Listen I am happy that you guys are doing well but the benefit of being able to drop and then pick up trips only will last as long as you all are short staff. I am happy that things are looking good for you guys but no one knows what the future holds and things can quickly change. If it were not for the 2 pilots recovering after stalling out both engines in the climb a couple of months ago PSA might be an after thought and instead of gloating about how well things are going you might be sending messages out trying to find jobs at different airlines.
Over 3 years ago and both very experienced pilots.... Nice try on a cheap shot with an ignorant response or just plain stupidity as you quote a time frame not close.
meyers9163 is offline  
Old 09-08-2014, 05:04 PM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Da Magic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 302
Default

All emotions aside, as an Envoy CA I think when comparing PSA and Envoy it's apples and oranges. PSA was targeted by management. They saw an opportunity to get 60% of 400 pilots to change the regional industry!

This is where ALPA let Envoy down. The two pilot groups have nothing to do with each other but are faced with playing with the same deck of cards.
Da Magic is offline  
Old 09-08-2014, 05:10 PM
  #169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,924
Default

What's with the MEC emails floating around from PSA and XJT that are in support of Envoy? It sounds just like the "express our/my deepest condolences" when somebody dies. They're just empty words that mean nothing, but it sounds good to say it, and then you go golfing. At the end of the day nothing changes. A real test would be if these MEC (PSA, XJT, and whoever else writes for Envoy) is willing to approach their own management in order to get Envoy pilots on property with credit for longevity for pay and bidding schedules/vacation. That's solidarity and true support but you can bet it'll never happen. Many pilots are self-serving and greedy, which is why I believe PSA voted yes in the first place. I do feel bad for the Envoy guys, they stood up for what's right and basically got stabbed in the back.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-08-2014, 05:17 PM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
evilboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: "if it's got wings, I can crash it".
Posts: 886
Default

Originally Posted by Da Magic
All emotions aside, as an Envoy CA I think when comparing PSA and Envoy it's apples and oranges. PSA was targeted by management. They saw an opportunity to get 60% of 400 pilots to change the regional industry!

This is where ALPA let Envoy down. The two pilot groups have nothing to do with each other but are faced with playing with the same deck of cards.

Finally someone with common sense and civility here. Kudos to you Sir.
evilboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KnightFlyer
Cargo
18
02-05-2014 07:32 PM
ACEFLYERSWA
Major
62
02-23-2009 03:04 PM
JNYVEGAS
Cargo
34
01-30-2009 09:21 PM
FlyingPirate
Regional
74
01-15-2009 03:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices