Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2860748)
Why aren’t FO’s pay banded then?
|
Originally Posted by MEGAFUPM
(Post 2860757)
Read my post right before yours as to why PSAs blended rate makes sense for them and not us.
And every airline your pay will be based on the the size of your aircraft and the number of seats it has. If you don't like that idea, then you should get out now. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2860764)
Is that why mesa pilots make so much money? Atlas pilots must be millionaires.
Same thing at JetBlue for another example. A320 pay is under market value pay compared to the legacies but you still get paid more than a 190 pilot. My point being, if you do make it to the mainlines, don't be surprised if your regional 737 flying is paid a lot less than international 787 flying for the same company. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2860748)
Why aren’t FO’s pay banded then?
|
Our blended rate would mean a paycut for most. PSA has a much higher ratio of large v.small RJs. Stop wishing for a blended rate. It would be a loss in pay.
That's not the way to fix this discrepancy. |
Originally Posted by Tyrion
(Post 2860723)
So, all those guys who could bid anywhere else but NY, but still choose NY, because they probably live in NY, would choose to commute to DFW just for $10/hr. Mind you that $10/hr gain would be wiped out by one missed commute. There are less than 100 people who could possibly do what you are suggesting, and they are giving up their no commute and first pick of lines just for $10/hr.
|
Originally Posted by MEGAFUPM
(Post 2860757)
Read my post right before yours as to why PSAs blended rate makes sense for them and not us.
And every airline your pay will be based on the the size of your aircraft and the number of seats it has. If you don't like that idea, then you should get out now. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2860879)
Our blended rate would mean a paycut for most. PSA has a much higher ratio of large v.small RJs. Stop wishing for a blended rate. It would be a loss in pay.
That's not the way to fix this discrepancy. |
Originally Posted by MEGAFUPM
(Post 2860757)
And every airline your pay will be based on the the size of your aircraft and the number of seats it has. If you don't like that idea, then you should get out now. |
Originally Posted by Crimson37Roger
(Post 2860899)
Well no sh*t. But it seems like every airline but us does this since were pay banded.
United flies the 757 and 767. Same type rating. 75s have one rate and 76 200&300 and 76-400s each have different rates. Significantly so. 767-400 trips go very senior because of it. True for captains and FOs. Envoy does not have different aircraft that share the same type. That being said, I think the whole pay band thing is bogus. While there is the statement on APC about it, it is clear that even most of the Envoy pilots still don’t understand what it really means and sure don’t have any idea how many people receive it or when they are eligible. Until this current set of pay changes, 145 FOs actually made more because of the higher sign on bonus. Explain that one. SNJ is more popular. Supply and demand. Doesn’t have anything to do with size of the aircraft. Maybe that should be taken into account with the pay rates. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:38 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands