Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

New hire considering Envoy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-05-2018, 10:51 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sheg0theD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 412
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot77Shields
Is the flow taking into account the attrition?




We got these numbers today..



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sheg0theD is offline  
Old 03-06-2018, 05:21 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot77Shields
Is the flow taking into account the attrition?
It doesn’t take into account hypothetical attrition. There’s no way of guessing how much attrition Envoy will see over the next few years.
bigtime209 is offline  
Old 03-06-2018, 06:07 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Position: Resigned
Posts: 1,547
Default

The rumor mill is spinning fast around the overstaffed condition of the airline, but I can't help but wonder if they're not just hiring to offset planned attrition while they hold the line on pay, QOL, 10+ year flow, etc. instead of coming up to what is becoming the new normal.
NoValueAviator is offline  
Old 03-06-2018, 06:56 AM
  #84  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Fully Retired
Posts: 7,000
Default

Thanks for the numbers.

81 (combined flow of 50 and attrition of 31) in 2 months. If that rate continues, (multiple times 6), 486 will leave over the year.

486 divided by 2366 pilots means 1/5th leaving over the course of the year. Take it for what it is worth.

To address the original question, the projected number of years to flow, as I understand it, assumes no attrition. That, in my opinion, is overly conservative.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 03-06-2018, 07:10 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 290
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld
Thanks for the numbers.

81 (combined flow of 50 and attrition of 31) in 2 months. If that rate continues, (multiple times 6), 486 will leave over the year.

486 divided by 2366 pilots means 1/5th leaving over the course of the year. Take it for what it is worth.

To address the original question, the projected number of years to flow, as I understand it, assumes no attrition. That, in my opinion, is overly conservative.
^^^^This. The haters on here neglect to point this out when claiming an "8 year or greater flow." The truth is the flow is much, much closer to the 6 year mark for a new hire today when taking the above into account.
cr700 is offline  
Old 03-06-2018, 07:27 AM
  #86  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 67
Default

The flow also takes into account that we will be sending pilots every single month. Pilots don't flow in December, and in fact we had two months last year where no one flowed.
Tellheritwasntu is offline  
Old 03-06-2018, 07:57 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,490
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld
Thanks for the numbers.

81 (combined flow of 50 and attrition of 31) in 2 months. If that rate continues, (multiple times 6), 486 will leave over the year.

486 divided by 2366 pilots means 1/5th leaving over the course of the year. Take it for what it is worth.
You really can’t take attrition numbers and use them in any meaningful way on a projection because the only attrition that matters for flow is the attrition that happens senior to YOU and that number is different for every pilot on property.

Originally Posted by cr700
^^^^This. The haters on here neglect to point this out when claiming an "8 year or greater flow." The truth is the flow is much, much closer to the 6 year mark for a new hire today when taking the above into account.
Anyone new to this forum, ignore this guy.

Originally Posted by Tellheritwasntu
The flow projection also takes into account that we will be sending pilots every single month. Pilots don't flow in December, and in fact we had two months last year where no one flowed.
Sorry, had to add the word there I’m sure you meant. But also wanted to point out that SO FAR, the union’s projection which assumes minimum flow every single month overcompensates for the attrition mentioned above such that everyone on property has seen their projected flow date extended further out. If attrition has really been an issue making the projection overly conservative, we’d see our projected flow dates shrinking. That has never happened YET. I’m open to the idea that it can change as the hiring picks up more at the majors but I have no idea how anyone can come up with a projection for that.
highfarfast is offline  
Old 03-06-2018, 08:24 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 260
Default

Originally Posted by cr700
^^^^This. The haters on here neglect to point this out when claiming an "8 year or greater flow." The truth is the flow is much, much closer to the 6 year mark for a new hire today when taking the above into account.
Proof? You can’t just throw that out there.
AZPilotMike is offline  
Old 03-06-2018, 08:46 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flysooner9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,723
Default

You guys are crazy to think attrition won’t be 80/month of greater. The major hiring at the legacy’s is just getting started. I would put money on the 31 non flow attrition to easily stay the same but probably increase.
flysooner9 is offline  
Old 03-06-2018, 09:34 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,490
Default

Originally Posted by flysooner9
You guys are crazy to think attrition won’t be 80/month of greater. The major hiring at the legacy’s is just getting started. I would put money on the 31 non flow attrition to easily stay the same but probably increase.
I hope you’re right but I don’t think I’ve flown with a single captain that is actively and agressively keeping their apps up to date. They are either ‘too close to flow to care’ or ‘I’m here because I don’t have a degree and want to work at a major’ or ‘AA or bust and AA barely hires OTS’ or ‘lifers’. Generally, flow is making this pilot group lazy with their career advancement so while I think attrition will pick up I think it will be lower here than at airlines without flow. AND, as long as the union’s projections keep showing to be conservative (shown by flow date moving further out with each update), I’m not counting on it being any shorter than the union projections.
highfarfast is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HanSoolu
Envoy Airlines
153
07-15-2019 01:50 PM
ag386
Envoy Airlines
96
07-11-2019 06:15 AM
diva
Envoy Airlines
649
09-19-2015 10:03 AM
Justadude
Envoy Airlines
80
07-26-2015 05:56 PM
AllisonRR
Envoy Airlines
45
10-07-2014 05:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices