Flow to AA
#41
Flow to AA
How to solve our FLOW problems...
http://<a href="https://m.youtube.co...bYWhdLO43Q</a>
The only conceptual way to stop our “metered” FLOW problem. Complaining will do nothing.
http://<a href="https://m.youtube.co...bYWhdLO43Q</a>
The only conceptual way to stop our “metered” FLOW problem. Complaining will do nothing.
Last edited by SilentLurker; 02-17-2018 at 01:28 PM.
#42
Food for thought. . .
Boeing’s projection for the next 20 years is an AVERAGE of almost 6,000 new hire pilots per year for North America.
Considering military, other commercial flying, regional lifers, Canada, etc. rolled in this; the projected number of hires from the regionals would be 4,000 to 5,000 new hire pilots per year to the majors.
There are 20,000 regional pilots. That would mean hiring would be 1/5 to 1/4 of that total per year. In other words, 5 to 4 years average from new hire at a regional to being hired at a major.
With current estimates here of 9 to 10 years for flow to AA, do you think things will stay like that? Do you think it is sustainable, or do you think something will have to change?
Your thoughts??
Boeing’s projection for the next 20 years is an AVERAGE of almost 6,000 new hire pilots per year for North America.
Considering military, other commercial flying, regional lifers, Canada, etc. rolled in this; the projected number of hires from the regionals would be 4,000 to 5,000 new hire pilots per year to the majors.
There are 20,000 regional pilots. That would mean hiring would be 1/5 to 1/4 of that total per year. In other words, 5 to 4 years average from new hire at a regional to being hired at a major.
With current estimates here of 9 to 10 years for flow to AA, do you think things will stay like that? Do you think it is sustainable, or do you think something will have to change?
Your thoughts??
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 260
Food for thought. . .
Boeing’s projection for the next 20 years is an AVERAGE of almost 6,000 new hire pilots per year for North America.
Considering military, other commercial flying, regional lifers, Canada, etc. rolled in this; the projected number of hires from the regionals would be 4,000 to 5,000 new hire pilots per year to the majors.
There are 20,000 regional pilots. That would mean hiring would be 1/5 to 1/4 of that total per year. In other words, 5 to 4 years average from new hire at a regional to being hired at a major.
With current estimates here of 9 to 10 years for flow to AA, do you think things will stay like that? Do you think it is sustainable, or do you think something will have to change?
Your thoughts??
Boeing’s projection for the next 20 years is an AVERAGE of almost 6,000 new hire pilots per year for North America.
Considering military, other commercial flying, regional lifers, Canada, etc. rolled in this; the projected number of hires from the regionals would be 4,000 to 5,000 new hire pilots per year to the majors.
There are 20,000 regional pilots. That would mean hiring would be 1/5 to 1/4 of that total per year. In other words, 5 to 4 years average from new hire at a regional to being hired at a major.
With current estimates here of 9 to 10 years for flow to AA, do you think things will stay like that? Do you think it is sustainable, or do you think something will have to change?
Your thoughts??
#44
Do you think there will be a significant increase in OTS hires from Envoy, not waiting for flow?
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 260
One of two things will happen in my opinion.
1. Envoy will hold current rates with the flow being a main compensator. This will cause lots of pilots to leave for greener pastors, bigger types and better pay/QOL at an LCC. These pilots will the attempt to jump the flow or simply enjoy the QOL and seniority at their respective airline.
2. Envoy will increase rates enough to keep pilots hanging around for the flow which is increasing day by day. This is the best thing for Envoy to stop the constant ups and downs of hiring.
Personally option 1 is the most likely for the pilots in the middle of the seniority list if you ask me.
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,030
Did they really start a whole new thread about flow? That is literally the only thing the usual suspects talk about on the Envoy thread. That’s all that Envoy is good for now. Thinking about the flow every day. All day. I mean come on. You won’t see the flow for years. Around 8 years for new hires...
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
That I can’t say but I would assume so. Honestly if things go as planned, the flow may be one of the slower routes to a mainline job.
One of two things will happen in my opinion.
1. Envoy will hold current rates with the flow being a main compensator. This will cause lots of pilots to leave for greener pastors, bigger types and better pay/QOL at an LCC. These pilots will the attempt to jump the flow or simply enjoy the QOL and seniority at their respective airline.
2. Envoy will increase rates enough to keep pilots hanging around for the flow which is increasing day by day. This is the best thing for Envoy to stop the constant ups and downs of hiring.
Personally option 1 is the most likely for the pilots in the middle of the seniority list if you ask me.
One of two things will happen in my opinion.
1. Envoy will hold current rates with the flow being a main compensator. This will cause lots of pilots to leave for greener pastors, bigger types and better pay/QOL at an LCC. These pilots will the attempt to jump the flow or simply enjoy the QOL and seniority at their respective airline.
2. Envoy will increase rates enough to keep pilots hanging around for the flow which is increasing day by day. This is the best thing for Envoy to stop the constant ups and downs of hiring.
Personally option 1 is the most likely for the pilots in the middle of the seniority list if you ask me.
#49
You should read my post I just made on the thread “Jump the Flow”.
AA plan for 2018 (re-verified by the Schoolhouse last week) is to hire about 275 ADDITIONAL pilots than 2017.
Where are they going to come from? Higher flow numbers? Doubt it.
Higher Mil OTS? Unless someone is sitting on an additional pot of Mil Pilots interested but not being hired or AA wrangles a higher share, doubt it.
So, I conclude much of those 275 ADDITIONAL will come from Civ. OTS. That will mark the first year that Civ OTS will be a sizable percentage. (Maybe one third of total hires.)
And we have not hit the peak of the retirements.
AA plan for 2018 (re-verified by the Schoolhouse last week) is to hire about 275 ADDITIONAL pilots than 2017.
Where are they going to come from? Higher flow numbers? Doubt it.
Higher Mil OTS? Unless someone is sitting on an additional pot of Mil Pilots interested but not being hired or AA wrangles a higher share, doubt it.
So, I conclude much of those 275 ADDITIONAL will come from Civ. OTS. That will mark the first year that Civ OTS will be a sizable percentage. (Maybe one third of total hires.)
And we have not hit the peak of the retirements.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
You should read my post I just made on the thread “Jump the Flow”.
AA plan for 2018 (re-verified by the Schoolhouse last week) is to hire about 275 ADDITIONAL pilots than 2017.
Where are they going to come from? Higher flow numbers? Doubt it.
Higher Mil OTS? Unless someone is sitting on an additional pot of Mil Pilots interested but not being hired or AA wrangles a higher share, doubt it.
So, I conclude much of those 275 ADDITIONAL will come from Civ. OTS. That will mark the first year that Civ OTS will be a sizable percentage. (Maybe one third of total hires.)
And we have not hit the peak of the retirements.
AA plan for 2018 (re-verified by the Schoolhouse last week) is to hire about 275 ADDITIONAL pilots than 2017.
Where are they going to come from? Higher flow numbers? Doubt it.
Higher Mil OTS? Unless someone is sitting on an additional pot of Mil Pilots interested but not being hired or AA wrangles a higher share, doubt it.
So, I conclude much of those 275 ADDITIONAL will come from Civ. OTS. That will mark the first year that Civ OTS will be a sizable percentage. (Maybe one third of total hires.)
And we have not hit the peak of the retirements.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post