Search

Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Endeavor and Republic?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2016, 03:22 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gearswinger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 465
Default

It is pathetic to argue about what regional jet is better. I fly the 900, it's a great plane. I'd rather fly a 175, I like it better based on what I've seen and after a few thousand hours it'd be fun to change it up. However, if you are making a decision of which carrier to work for and 175 vs 900 vs 200 factor into it AT ALL, you just don't get it. Pay, QOL, stability. Those are the factors. Underwing vs tail time is a non existent category. Grow up.
Gearswinger is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 03:34 PM
  #82  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 33
Default

Lots of sarcasm a thousand feet above and opposite direction today...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
FlyinFool is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 04:03 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 480
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
Are you sure about the 175 having better fuel economy? I was always told that it had basically the same engines, but is heavier thus having worse fuel economy
This is true. The 700/900 performs better and do in fact have better fuel economy. There's a reason every 700/900 operator flys a good bit faster than 170/175 operators.
WakeWash is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 04:29 PM
  #84  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

My point is that chasing strechy, shiny jets is more dubious than chasing upgrade. Every time I see this, I cringe. I have also been saying to people who are going to the CRJ operators to think twice about choosing the 700 or 900 over a 200 just because they are perceived to be cool.

I also am hoping employees of places like RAH, who have a troubled history with management, are treated better going forward. However, management is smart enough to know that dangling "cool" jets has power.
block30 is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 04:39 PM
  #85  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 519
Default

Had I not left the two mistakes (even though you only caught one), you'd have no reason to come back to me and ask me to come at you. :O)

No, it doesn't really matter which jet (well, maybe drop the 200, it really is getting long in the tooth). What matters is 1000, and beyond that, maybe some TPIC.

Originally Posted by block30
Show me where you are is mandatory versus you're. Most correct required reworking the entire sentence. Looks like your first sentence also needs work. Come at me bro.
BobJenkins is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 05:12 PM
  #86  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 62
Default

Well that got out of hand fast. Some people get super offensive over some sarcasm.

I just threw the E170 line in there as a caveat. Not saying 900 isn't a nice plane but I'd rather fly the 170 and not have to sit in line for 2 years waiting to fly a 900.
MrERJ is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 06:32 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 135
Default

Originally Posted by MrERJ
Republic isnt bad. Never sat a day of reserve in my time here. I have 15 days off this month. I usually credit around 95 hours with about 78 hours block time. Any time you are are asked to pick up you can get a feee hotel and deadhead to base if needed plus its at 150% pay. Classes are full through like March of 2016 and continuing to fill. Plus you get to fly the E175 which is far superior to other regional aircraft.

If you have any specific questions let me know.

Not saying endeavor is bad but I've enjoyed my time at Republic.

Not that anyone cares but this is why pilots are our own worst enemies.

While there are 145 FOs who are stuck on RSV for 2-3 yrs, here come brand new FOs that get better pay, more days off, and bonus signing pay getting lines out of IOE on the shinny 175. I wish this was some sick joke but it's not....
CptGSXR is offline  
Old 01-03-2016, 06:51 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gearswinger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 465
Default

Originally Posted by MrERJ
Well that got out of hand fast. Some people get super offensive over some sarcasm.

I just threw the E170 line in there as a caveat. Not saying 900 isn't a nice plane but I'd rather fly the 170 and not have to sit in line for 2 years waiting to fly a 900.
Where would you be waiting in line for 2 years to fly a 900? Certainly not Endeavor where new hires have a line within 4 months of starting class.
Gearswinger is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 08:23 AM
  #89  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 12
Default New to the 121 world

As I am new to the 121 world after many years in the corporate side of aviation I was wondering when applying does every company use
Airlineapps.com to apply for these flying jobs

Thanks
rway36 is offline  
Old 01-04-2016, 08:53 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Inverted
Posts: 402
Default

Originally Posted by rway36
As I am new to the 121 world after many years in the corporate side of aviation I was wondering when applying does every company use

Airlineapps.com to apply for these flying jobs



Thanks

If you look on the homepage for Airlineapps it lists which companies use it. Not all airlines use that website


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HeyOneTaco is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices