Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Endeavor Air
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Search

Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2016, 09:23 AM
  #8731  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by jethikoki
Funny isn't it maybe about 15 years ago you would have to be at a mainline to be flying a 76 seater.
15 years ago the "70 seater" was green lighted and on the way to the regionals regardless. And the Bach Jet was already at the regionals, including one DL bought. That wouldn't have gotten an SLI.

Also, ever wonder why ALPA had to adjust its ALPA merger policy after DAL bought COMAIR as it was a little vague between mainline and regional buyout?
The actions of the CMR (and ASA, although because of timing to a slighter lesser extent) didn't stop an SLI, but they guaranteed it wouldn't happen. Their strategy was to take the runway, reach V1, and then and only then, figure out how to proceed. IOW, commit to an SLI with no conditions or protections, and only after it was committed to, then fight it out. That was a horrible strategy that didn't work out, and bloviating about the sanctity of "the process" rings hollow to this day.
gloopy is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 09:27 AM
  #8732  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,544
Default

Originally Posted by Braniff DC8
Long before silly little RJs and FMS, there were 727s, DC-9s and L188s flying out of NYC. Hell, they flew DC-10s, Tri Stars and A300s there as well meaning LGA. Don't for get the piston age either and you think you're busy now! Pushing buttons and ATC, oh no pilots being pilots. Guys my era are laughing at this because tis is silly. Not a slog at Endeavor pilots just the statement of NY being busy now in an RJ is all. Flew the Whitestone by hand all the time, in heavy snow, t storms, with no autopilot, why, there was no autopilot. Now you probably won't believe this but I, and many many others, flew in and out of LGA, no autopilot, wait for it, you might want to sit down for this next part-ready? SINGLE PILOT! Oh the insanty! My friends and I laugh at all this NY, LGA talk as if it's a dangerous place. Busy yes, dangerous no.
Yeah and you got +/- miles on each side of the airway before anyone cared, and +/- a full 300 ft as well. If you messed up then, it was far less likely to have lead to a loss of separation. Now they expect zero variance. A couple tenths of a mile is a big deal, and snitch boxes are way more prevalent than you think. Its great to practice hand flying and I agree that collectively we don't do it enough, but sometimes you have to swallow your pride and monitor the AP.
gloopy is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 09:32 AM
  #8733  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 6 Train - Panhandler
Posts: 2,001
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Not being a good fit doesn't mean not safe or competent. Every airline has turned down "tier one" heavy hitters from all backgrounds, including LCA's, fighter pilots, pilots with a million type ratings, Air Force 2 pilots, decorated fighter pilots, etc. That doesn't mean an airline that turns them down this they're "untrustworthy" or "scums". Airlines all have a set of criteria of what they're looking for that goes far beyond safety or trustworthiness. Lots of what they try to assess is based on personality and cultural fit.

Also, every airline hires pilots who weren't hired at other airlines. The interview process is never perfect. Some good pilots slip through the cracks and don't get hired who should, and some "future one percenters" sneak past the process and sometimes even their first year. But a flow guarantees that an airline is forced to take 100% of the pilots that won't be a good fit at an airline, and that's why there historically have been very few flows compared to being hired by interviews. That's just how it is, and that doesn't make it a dramatic injustice like you're implying.

Going full emo with the hyperbole and trying to turn it into something it isn't is probably related to some of that. No airline would ever hire anyone who they knew that, if they didn't hire them, they would act childish about it.
It would seem that your response would serve to amplify what I'm saying. I believe my post was meant to reflect an observation in what the current trend is. Not an insatiable emotional tirade. I do believe that mainline screens out or rather disqualifies applicants on criteria that has nothing to do with job-related qualifications or experience. That's the observation I am conveying. I am not complaining. Any company could hire whom they please. What's more in observation, it would appear that mainline would prefer not to hire people with a lack of good education, overweight, single, and nonparticipant with community relations.
TalkTurkey is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 09:47 AM
  #8734  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 480
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Yeah and you got +/- miles on each side of the airway before anyone cared, and +/- a full 300 ft as well. If you messed up then, it was far less likely to have lead to a loss of separation. Now they expect zero variance. A couple tenths of a mile is a big deal, and snitch boxes are way more prevalent than you think. Its great to practice hand flying and I agree that collectively we don't do it enough, but sometimes you have to swallow your pride and monitor the AP.
I gotta tell you, this is the third time I've started the slow clap after reading your posts today. Good points, all.
JesuitValen is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 10:31 AM
  #8735  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by TalkTurkey
Any company could hire whom they please. What's more in observation, it would appear that mainline would prefer not to hire people with a lack of good education, overweight, single, and nonparticipant with community relations.
That's because people like that are more dependent on the system, they are better for the company, especially airlines that go through hard times. After two bankruptcies, and a merger, the only former Mesaba ones left, were the loyal diehards. They had the highest success rate of anyone in the SSP.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 11:35 AM
  #8736  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jethikoki's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
15 years ago the "70 seater" was green lighted and on the way to the regionals regardless. And the Bach Jet was already at the regionals, including one DL bought. That wouldn't have gotten an SLI.



The actions of the CMR (and ASA, although because of timing to a slighter lesser extent) didn't stop an SLI, but they guaranteed it wouldn't happen. Their strategy was to take the runway, reach V1, and then and only then, figure out how to proceed. IOW, commit to an SLI with no conditions or protections, and only after it was committed to, then fight it out. That was a horrible strategy that didn't work out, and bloviating about the sanctity of "the process" rings hollow to this day.
After Lorenzo transferred Eastern's assets to his wholly owned alter ego, Continental, and Continental left ALPA, our union was determined to never let management whipsaw us again. ALPA adopted strong language designed to prevent whipsaw by forced mergers. Delta was a beneficiary of the Texas Air mess and was never that fond of mergers (or ALPA) for that matter. (there was a abortive decertification drive then too)

It is likely the Delta MEC had advanced notice that Delta intended to buy ASA and Comair (can't prove it) but we do know the Delta MEC led a push to remove that merger language at the 1998 ALPA BOD.

Concomitant with the denial of Comair and ASA's merger request, ALPA adopted this "permitted" model which divided ALPA members into preferred and non preferred groups.

Without a real merger policy, there was no way to force real, structural, unity. In effect ALPA agreed to alter ego whipsaw, as long as it existed at the permitted aircraft level.

The perception was, and is, that express jobs are not real airline pilot jobs. That for some reason regional flying, which indistinguishably mimics the flying mainline does, is simply a stepping stone to a real job ... and only real jobs should be protected.

Ultimately I am merely advocating equality "but not at the expense or demise of any mainline position or job". What are you advocating? Would it had made any difference in the merger if NWA or Western Airlines had same or less hiring practices then any regional? I doubt it. Where is the hiring practices mentioned in ALPA's merger policy? Would it not be better for ALL pilots to go through the same interview when operating equipment for that company?

Last edited by jethikoki; 11-30-2016 at 11:57 AM.
jethikoki is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 11:56 AM
  #8737  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

What happened to Comair was a disgrace to unionism, but the Delta pilots were in a position of power, all too often that results in the lessor group getting screwed. Happens all the time, and will continue to happen till the end of time.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 11:56 AM
  #8738  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bonesbrigade's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 352
Default

Originally Posted by CFin
All -900s have dual FMS and printers.

You can hand fly whatever you want as long as you're not in RVSM. Normal call is autopilot on at 600 AFE.
That's not the normal call at all.
That is the minimum engagement height.
In the thousands of hours I have here I'd say that maybe 20 percent of the time it is called for right at 600.
bonesbrigade is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 12:01 PM
  #8739  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 896
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
What happened to Comair was a disgrace to unionism, but the Delta pilots were in a position of power, all too often that results in the lessor group getting screwed. Happens all the time, and will continue to happen till the end of time.
That's what happens when we pay 1.9% of your salary to the Delta Air Lines Pilot Association.
Green Needles is offline  
Old 11-30-2016, 12:04 PM
  #8740  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jethikoki's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 471
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
What happened to Comair was a disgrace to unionism, but the Delta pilots were in a position of power, all too often that results in the lessor group getting screwed. Happens all the time, and will continue to happen till the end of time.
Agreed and what DAL did to 9E pilots was also and a failure of ALPA. But why did the Delta MEC feel a need to make changes to ALPAs merger policy? Maybe it was good timing he did!

Last edited by jethikoki; 11-30-2016 at 12:23 PM.
jethikoki is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 11:23 AM
WARich
Delta
11220
06-10-2020 08:42 AM
Crash
Major
3437
01-30-2013 07:51 PM
shua757
Major
2
02-24-2009 07:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices